• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    48 months ago

    Having a different pronoun for non-human animals reinforces the belief that we’re separate from other animals.

    • @mokosai
      link
      108 months ago

      Which we are, so that’s fine. It’s fine to have your opinion, but to assume it is so universal as to be part of the rules of grammar is a bridge too far.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        What? No. It’s disrespectful to call any animal, Homo or not, “it”. Sexual creatures of unknown gender are “they”. Always.

        • @SkippingRelax
          link
          48 months ago

          Actually you were, and everyone replied accordingly.

          You seem confused

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            17 months ago

            I was taking about how the language we use reinforces belief structures. It’s like saying “illegal aliens” vs. “undocumented workers”. Both are valid grammatically, but your choice of terms indicates your biases.

            I think if you view non-human animals as conscious beings, you’re more likely to call them “they” instead of “it”.

            • @SkippingRelax
              link
              47 months ago

              Except that you are the one with biases here, you are the one who replied to someone who was clearly talking/asking about grammar rules and you did it with a weird twist around (your?) belief structures .

              It’s an interesting take but one that maybe you need to explain and not give for granted that everyone knows what is going on in your head. Also you just did then same yourself with non human animals, same as illegal aliens mate.