• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    798 months ago

    Not sure why, would have been a pretty cool addition to the universe.

    I can imagine nowadays people saying it’s “too woke” though.

    • @Skullgrid
      link
      418 months ago

      Back then :

      It won’t bring in the same money, don’t put your weird tranny shit

      Now :

      This is marketable in certain demographics, but we’ve already met the diversity quota, so no thanks. Besides, we don’t want it to be too “political” and lose our dependable fanbase.

      • @Ultraviolet
        link
        English
        68 months ago

        Ah yes, famously apolitical movie The Matrix in the entirely apolitical genre of dystopian sci-fi.

        • @Skullgrid
          link
          38 months ago

          Dystopian? Ah yes, no one was turning a profit. Very sad.

          Although that Cyrus character was quite the go getter.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      I can think of one reasonable reason for it. They’d be harder to identify between the two versions. It makes some sense to not change the look that much (or the actor if that was the plan) to not confuse the audience.

      • @Mirshe
        link
        58 months ago

        Also have to pay and credit two actors for one role, which might get sticky, especially with awards.

        • @Wilzax
          link
          88 months ago

          I mean you credit them as 2 different roles, Switch (In-Matrix) and Switch (IRL). Happens all the time for different ages of the same characters being portrayed by younger and older actors.