WASHINGTON, D.C. – After narrowly backing Israel’s military action in Gaza in November, Americans now oppose the campaign by a solid margin. Fifty-five percent currently disapprove of Israel’s actions, while 36% approve.

  • @frostmore
    link
    09 months ago

    co-existence is accepting the facts that 1 entity has a right to exist just as any other and you do not arbitrary decide how far back in time to determine who stole whose home.

    next, israeli settlers illegally settling in land that does not belong to them is a problem that needs solving,this has been made very clear,your magnification of the violence doesn’t negate that fact other than pushing your bias narratives.

    hamas never stopped declaring their aim to wipe israel from existence, despite their renewed charter.the fancy words they used serve nothing but to hoodwink the less sophisticated.

    if your logic prevails,then prc,timor leste,previous soviet states or even america has no right to exist because they stole,occupy and settled in lands that does not belong to them and the original inhabitants should wage terror attacks on the populance because,you know,these people are stealing lands of their great grand father or however far back in time these terrorists chose.

    it’s sad that you have, on multiple times, try to push your bias agenda and narratives and each time you are only serving to highlight your bias.

    • @Keeponstalin
      link
      09 months ago

      Israel has never had intentions of coexistence, it was founded on Settler Colonialism… You’re white washing ethnic cleansing.

      • @frostmore
        link
        09 months ago

        hamas never had any intentions of co-existence only genocide and terrorism.

        you are and have been justifying hamas terrorism and crimes as the aspirations of palestinians,disgusting to say the least.

        • @Keeponstalin
          link
          0
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          You’re literally wrong. Has Hamas done war crimes? Yes. You don’t need to make things up to not like Hamas. I’ve provided so many resources to learn the history. Instead you’d rather justify settler Colonialism, ethnic cleansing, and collective punishment. When you do that, it’s clear you don’t see Palestinians as human beings.

          • @frostmore
            link
            09 months ago

            i could say the same to you.

            unlike you,i do not solely focus on one side’s atrocities to paint the other like some kind of victim.

            you are literally a hamas apologist using palestinians to push your agenda for genocide.your resources aren’t exactly neutral to begin with.

              • @frostmore
                link
                0
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                and i am clearly saying there are no good guys in this conflict,no one side has the moral high ground over the other.

                palestine and israel have the right to exist and to overly focus on the elimination/vilification of one over the other is not going to solve anything let alone your so called ending of genocide or equal rights.

                • @Keeponstalin
                  link
                  0
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Israel was founded on ethnic cleansing and settler colonialism, directly responsible for the ongoing apartheid, and is currently engaging in genocide.

                  I’m not saying Hamas if good. The majority of Palestinians don’t either. Palestinians deserve a free and fair election to choose their representatives, but that’s not really possible living under a violent apartheid. Israel has prevented any peace solution. Armed militant groups like Hamas are the only ones fighting against the apartheid.

                  This is a war between the occupied and the occupier.

                  To Israel, Palestinians have never had any right to exist, or human rights, or civil rights.

                  I agree with New Historians on a One-State Solution. If you’re genuinely interested in the history of the conflict, you should read their books. They are significantly more detailed than any article and written with a huge amount of sources from both sides of the story.

                  The book ‘A History of Modern Palestine: One Land, Two Peoples’ by Ilan Pappe has a detailed account of the history since the early 1920s

                  How Avi Shlaim moved from two-state solution to one-state solution

                  ‘One state is a game changer’: A conversation with Ilan Pappe

                  History of peace process

                  One State Solution, Foreign Affairs

                  10 Myths of Israel

                  Palestine and Israel: Mapping an annexation

                  • @frostmore
                    link
                    09 months ago

                    you would have made a strong case…if you weren’t a hamas propagandist. i am now suspecting you are anti jewish as well.