• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    98 months ago

    this is the 3rd or 4th time I’ve said this on lemmy - but I cannot understand how she faced absolutely zero consequences from exposing herself and heavy rubbing in a crowded theatre.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      48 months ago

      Ideally that wouldn’t be a crime unless they were involving someone nearby involuntary (potentially just as a witness). Usually if people get frisky just ask them to leave and leave it at that - we don’t need more people on the sexual offenders list.

      That, at least, is the standard I’d like evenly applied.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        58 months ago

        It’s also like she has done enough political nonsense that her giving a handy way back, to her overage bf in a bowling alley or whatever is kind of a non issue at this point. You can now point to a bunch of public reasons why she should not be a political leader, regardless of her sexual proclivities of the past or present.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -8
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I’m not hopping onboard that opinion. If you expose yourself in a sexual manner(despite trying to be discreet) in a theater filled with people, you deserve to be labeled a sex offender. There could be children in the crowd or working as ushers.

        There’s already way too many stories of men and to a lesser extent women exposing themselves to people in public.

    • @Pretzilla
      link
      27 months ago

      It was a night vision camera so it’s debatable if there was consequential exposure