@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agothis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square216fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down160
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1imagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square216fedilink
minus-square@EheranlinkEnglish-4•2 months agoHahaha look how you get downvoted for stating the obvious. Amazing community here.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•2 months agoWell, it’s a classic. Now look at this: communism sounds good but it’s impossible in practice opens umbrella
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoIt’s so impossible in fact that the CIA spends millions destabilizing countries that are even threatening to become socialist.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoIt’s one of the reasons that make it impossible in practice. The USSR spent millions the other way tho.
minus-square@MetaCubedlinkEnglish1•2 months agoI dont see any rain coming, you can close your umbrella
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•2 months agoIs that supposed to count as"stating the obvious? O.o
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoThere are so many factual errors in their comment tho.
minus-square@EheranlinkEnglish3•2 months agoGood things you stated some? Why not have an actual discussion instead of a pissing contest?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoThat stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoI said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoWhat if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoWell, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 months agoYou just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoYou know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right
Hahaha look how you get downvoted for stating the obvious. Amazing community here.
Well, it’s a classic. Now look at this:
opens umbrella
They make bulletproof umbrellas now?
It’s so impossible in fact that the CIA spends millions destabilizing countries that are even threatening to become socialist.
It’s one of the reasons that make it impossible in practice.
The USSR spent millions the other way tho.
I dont see any rain coming, you can close your umbrella
Is that supposed to count as"stating the obvious? O.o
There are so many factual errors in their comment tho.
Good things you stated some? Why not have an actual discussion instead of a pissing contest?
That stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
I said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
What if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
Well, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
You just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
You know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right