• @NOT_RICK
    link
    English
    709 months ago

    I don’t understand why you kill Tango after Hifi Rush was so well received. Wack

    • dinckel
      link
      English
      359 months ago

      Because being received well isn’t what Microsoft are after. They’re after making as much money, as (un-)realistically possible, even if it means shutting down things. This isn’t the first, and definitely not the last time. They’ve had more than a handful of studios with iconic IPs, that got absolutely annihilated after acquisition

      • @ampersandrew
        link
        English
        249 months ago

        Being after well received titles is congruent with their Game Pass strategy. Being after as much money as possible would mean they probably should have charged more than $30 for one of the best games of the year.

    • @GeneralEmergency
      link
      English
      219 months ago

      Ten years to make one well received game. After two failed high budget titles, an attempt at a franchise, Ghostwire and a mobile game supported for only five months.

      The studio head Shinji Mikami left shortly after Hi-Fi rush. So I would guess any projects they had in the works weren’t interesting enough to justify the costs.

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      English
      109 months ago

      It was well received but did it have microtransactions? Checkmate game enjoyers!

    • @xkforce
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      Just because the company you work for is making bank doesn’t mean they won’t fire you at the drop of a hat if they think they can make more by doing it.

    • Captain Poofter
      link
      English
      -59 months ago

      Tbh, the game wasn’t even that good. After the first 5-6 hours most people put it down. It just becomes frustrating and not fun.