• @Bruhh
    link
    English
    1637 months ago

    If I remember correctly, it wasn’t even illegal since these scientific articles should have been public to begin with because they used public funds.

      • @RGB3x3
        link
        English
        297 months ago

        Well that’s definitely burying the lede from the OP.

        It wasn’t the sharing part they had a problem with, it was the B&E and hacking.

      • K0W4L5K1
        link
        fedilink
        English
        277 months ago

        That also may be so, but 35 years is fucked up for that. pretty sure child porn first time offenders is like 15 to 30 so hacking MIT for stuff that should have been free gets you more jail time then a first CP offence. OK thats fucked up

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        147 months ago

        I hacked my highschool servers when I was young and shared the upcoming exams, so everyone could prepare for them. Someone told the authorities, all I got was some extra exercise. Sure it wasn’t MIT, but still 35 years is ridiculous, even a year of prison would have been ridiculous.

    • @ivofcups
      link
      English
      17 months ago

      Paradoxically, that’s not how science jourals work. There are no difference between public or prívate funds in this regard.