AI-Generated George Carlin Drops Comedy Special That Daughter Speaks Out Against: ‘No Machine Will Ever Replace His Genius’::Stand-up comedian George Carlin has been brought back to life in an artificial intelligence-generated special called ‘I’m Glad I’m Dead.’

  • @Arkaelus
    link
    English
    158
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This must be the absolute epitome of this AI replication poor taste… The person who thought it would be a good idea to do this with Carlin, probably the one human who hated human bullshit more than anyone else to have ever existed, is either so out of touch they don’t even vibrate at the same frequency as the rest of existence, or so far up their own ass that they’re staring at their pancreas… An absolutely disgusting move.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5411 months ago

      so out of touch they don’t even vibrate at the same frequency as the rest of existence, or so far up their own ass that they’re staring at their pancreas

      What gets me is the creator says they “studied” Carlin in order to match his style. Imagine consuming Carlin’s entire body of work and still somehow thinking this was a good idea…

      • @not_woody_shaw
        link
        English
        1511 months ago

        I’m guessing they started with Carlin to get all the fuss out of the way up front, so they can get on with doing all the others with minimal outcry.

    • KingJalopy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2611 months ago

      Or they’re smart by trying to create outrage and generate those tasty clicks

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        511 months ago

        Reminds me of all those efforts to create Hologram Tupac.

        • Guy Dudeman
          link
          English
          211 months ago

          There was literally just one effort to create Hologram Tupac, and it was obvious that it was CG. This is much better.

    • andrew_bidlaw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 months ago

      I’d imagine there’s a skit to make ironising the whole situation, but I’m not sure anyone can pull it off just like him, or at all. Not this random guy refurbishing his older material to make a fake guest appearance. Before all his punchlines were days of hard work, and it would be twice of that to correctly mimick his style, gestures, sense of humor and guess what he’d say now. It’d be lovely to see a talented impersonator to try that, and using AI like that is just selling this guy cheap. He deserves a better homage if there’s one needed, and not pushed like that for promotion and without contacting his family.

  • @dhork
    link
    English
    68
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    “I just want to let you know very clearly that what you’re about to hear is not George Carlin. It’s my impersonation of George Carlin that I developed in the exact same way a human impressionist would"

    No, was not developed in the exact same way a human would work, because it’s not human. Should we let pitching machines play pro baseball now, just because they can throw any pitch with pinpoint control?

    • @NOT_RICK
      link
      English
      3611 months ago

      Should we let pitching machines play pro baseball now, just because they can throw any pitch with pinpoint control?

      This is how we end up with Blernsball

      • @db2
        link
        English
        1811 months ago

        The blerns are loaded, the count’s three blerns and two anti-blerns and the infield blern rule is in effect, right?

        • Ashy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Except for the word “blern” that was complete gibberish.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -111 months ago

      False analogy falacy. Comparing AI impersonation to pitching machines in pro baseball involves dissimilar contexts and functionalities.

      AI-based tools makes creating certain content easier, why being pissed at that? The guy who created the imperson clearly stated that the content was AI generated so there is no intended deception. He even wrote the script himself.

      It’s like being pissed at a baker for using an electric dough kneader instead of his hands to make bread, as it’s not made in the exact same way a human would work.

    • @bhmnscmm
      link
      English
      -1111 months ago

      It’s not the exact same way, but it’s still essentially the same outcome. Your pitching machine example doesn’t make sense because AI doesn’t do anything with pinpoint control.

      This objection is similar to saying photography isn’t an art form; all you do is point and press a button. In reality there is a lot more to it than that.

      • Knitwear
        link
        English
        011 months ago

        deleted by creator

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3711 months ago

    No one cares if it’s right or wrong … absolutely no one cares what anyone thinks about any of it, about ethics, morals, respect or rights.

    All anyone cares about is how much money it’s going to make.

    We should install a turbine onto Carlin’s coffin because he’s probably spinning so fast right now, he could power New York City.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This has happened with the estates of famous people for a long time. It didn’t start with the current trend of deep learning systems.

      Tupac’s estate has mined every single little recording he did and pressed it to an album. Gene Roddenberry’s notes got turned into two series (Earth: Final Conflict and Andromeda), both of which started pretty good and slowly degraded over time. The Tolkien estate was held back by Christopher for a long time, but now he’s gone, the remaining heirs are happy to rake in the cash, and they’re being thoughtless about what they greenlight (like the Gollum game) (oh, and there’s only about 20 years for them to keep the copyright, which isn’t that long; Peter Jackson movies were about 20 years ago).

      Franz Kafka instructed all his unpublished manuscripts be burned when he died. GRRM has instructed that even if he doesn’t finish A Song of Ice and Fire before his death, it will not be picked up by another author to finish. These are wise people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        711 months ago

        A notable exception would be Robert Jordan and his Wheel of Time series. He prepared notes so someone could finish the work and his widow picked Brandon Sanderson to finish the series. But I think it feels easier to milk it than to be thoughtful with the life’s work of someone, as this requires a lot “would he have liked it” and to know this you would have to start caring early.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    English
    3210 months ago

    This is in very poor taste.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2711 months ago

    I met Kelly Carlin once. She is an awesome human being and cares a lot about her father’s legacy.

    • @AlfredEinstein
      link
      English
      411 months ago

      Does she own the rights to his work by chance?

  • @Mango
    link
    English
    2111 months ago

    I’m not here to rage about the whole human vs machine thing because I honestly don’t give two shits. However, this isn’t very good. The pacing feels like George Carlin, but that’s about it. It’s really more like an edgy Ryan Reynolds.

    • Guy Dudeman
      link
      English
      -3
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I disagree. It’s actually pretty good. Hopefully some people will be outraged enough to actually listen to it.

      The joke structure is 100% Carlin’s. The delivery is almost perfect. The message is spot-on.

      • @MirthfulAlembic
        link
        English
        1810 months ago

        As someone who’s consumed every album and special George Carlin produced, it felt like someone retelling their memory of some of his bits. Like regurgitation. It’d be impressive if your nephew performed this at his thirteenth birthday party after becoming obsessed with Carlin.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          it felt like someone retelling their memory of some of his bits. Like regurgitation.

          That’s because that’s exactly what these are. They don’t create new things. They use and modify existing work.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            They being the writers of the joke, which are humans. The AI part is only imitating George Carlins voice and cadence.

            • Cethin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              Oh, well that changes a lot. I assumed it was AI generated jokes. The people writting the jokes should just tell it themselves. What’s the point of using Carlin’s likeness?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                Could be they are not good at telling jokes, or they wanted to use material that are more associated with George Carlin rather than them. I don’t know.

                IMO, using AI voices is funnier when you make them say things the real person would never say, so I don’t see the appeal of imitating someone.

        • @kromem
          link
          English
          210 months ago

          It’d be impressive if your nephew performed this at his thirteenth birthday party after becoming obsessed with Carlin.

          Given modern generative large language models are still about a decade away from a thirteenth birthday, this is pretty impressive then.

          Does anyone remember the Seinfeld AI generation in 2022?

          Do we really think this tech is going to stop here and not improve at all after such rapid growth in the past two years?

          By the time of its thirteenth birthday I suspect it’s going to have gotten much better at writing jokes.

        • Nusm
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          See, I disagree. Someone retelling their memory of some of his bits, or your nephew performing at his birthday party would be telling old George Carlin jokes. This was new material and was topical, which I think is cool. It’s hard to know what George would really think about today’s climate, but I can’t imagine it would be too far off from the this.

          Was it perfect? No. But if I know what it is going in, I can sit back and just enjoy it for what it is - entertainment.

      • @Sekrayray
        link
        English
        311 months ago

        Agree. It was fun to hear. The bit around 37 mins about what it’s like being dead was fun

        • Nusm
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          The bit about AI Bill Cosby made me laugh the hardest. “You get all of the Cosby jokes with none of the Cosby rapes!”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1710 months ago

    Of course they can’t. But they can and will exploit every single word he’s ever said. Then exploit every idiot who gives said AI product and sense of their attention.

    Gotta be a dick here though. If they listen to the honestly lying charade running now then they didn’t hear him when he explained the first time.

  • @Jordan117
    link
    English
    1111 months ago

    I listened to it and it’s genuinely not bad (on a content and voice synthesis level), to the point that I have a hard time believing it was entirely AI-generated. If it’s not a fake ghostwritten by the creators, it must have been heavily rerolled and edited to make it so coherent.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      1611 months ago

      I listened to it and it’s genuinely not bad

      Of course not. Its predicated on the collected works of a decades-long professional comedian.

      If you re-mixed a new screenplay using the combined works of Shakespeare (and called it, idk, West Side Story or 10 Things I Hate About You or The Lion King) you could put together a blockbuster movie fairly easily, too.

      If it’s not a fake ghostwritten by the creators, it must have been heavily rerolled and edited to make it so coherent.

      The rise of ‘pseudo-AI’: how tech firms quietly use humans to do bots’ work

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        “Mechanical turk” jobs are way more hellish than any realistic AI dystopia, even though some AI developments use MTurks

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      Fully agree. There’s absolutely no way his whole bit about guns was generated from an LLM, while including the tangent about Japan. There had to have been a significant amount of leading prompts to get it to that point. At which point, whoever developed those prompts gets (at least partial) credit as a writer

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    911 months ago

    This is so tragicomedically the opposite of everything that Carlin was about in so many ways that it’s difficult to fully comprehend

    • Optional
      link
      English
      211 months ago

      AI can’t smoke cigarettes. So. We’re saved.

  • @werefreeatlast
    link
    English
    511 months ago

    The man was a genius for sure 100% I loved every bit of all the shit he said.