• @simple
    link
    English
    601 year ago

    But for real though, they had to know that having telemetry be on by default wasn’t going to look good for the open source community.

    • @DishonestBirbOP
      link
      English
      381 year ago

      Especially with Red Hat’s current shenanigans that just recently happened. I can’t see how anyone thought this was a good idea OR good timing for it.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Fedora is separate from Redhat for the most part. It has its own board that makes decisions

        • @DishonestBirbOP
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          The discussion thread for Fedora specifically stated that the change was requested by Red Hat, as well.

    • @Chickenstalker
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      Power corrupts. Let this be a lesson in letting corporations get a foothold in open source.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    361 year ago

    Can we all just pretend Red Hat and its derivatives/relatives no longer exist? It’s clear that the leadership behind these projects don’t care about open source anymore. There are plenty of options for Linux operating systems that actually care about user freedom, privacy, and openness. Anything with Red Hat backing it no longer gets to claim they support any of these.

    Install Debian, install Arch. If you must, install Ubuntu (though they’re not much better these days). Anything but Red Hat.

    • hib
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      Don’t forget SUSE :D

      Everyone always forgets SUSE :(

      • @d3Xt3r
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        SuSE needs a better package manager. Zypper was cool back in the day, but no longer cuts it, especially when you compare it to the likes of dnf5.

        • hib
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Totally disagree, but that’s a given when it comes to package managers I think. I showed my coworker who was RHEL to the core some neat Zypper features and he was pretty impressed. One feature I think is cool that I don’t think anyone else has is zypper ps which shows processes with open file handles to files that were updated. I also really like the way it handles conflict resolution and the same package in multiple repos.

    • @j4k3
      link
      English
      151 year ago

      RHEL is the core IT/SysAdmin crowd. Anyone looking to get into this career space gets a copy of The Linux Bible and runs Fedora to get started. A lot of the Linux core functionality comes from, and is maintained by RH. This is not just a desktop choice for users. If you really want to get to a kernel hacking type of understanding of Linux RHEL documentation is a great baseline where there is info that does not exist in any other source except reading the source code.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t you think that’s a bit extreme? I don’t think that the community debating opt-out telemetry qualifies fedora as not supporting open source. Correct me if I’m wrong, but Fedora is a community run project, meaning basically all of it has to be open source.

      • @curve
        link
        English
        111 year ago

        There’s so much dumb fud spread about fedora and RHEL anymore it’s not worth the time arguing about it.

        • @KingKRool
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          It’s exhausting, and shit like this is truly one of the most toxic aspects of the FOSS community.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I am also very tired of debating it too. It seems like these people are more content with being angry about it than understanding the move and disagreeing with it

    • @anonymous_bot
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      Lets say I wanted a distro with more bleeding edge packages but not something DIY like Arch, what would you recommend?

      • @RainRaining
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        Nowadays I use EndeavourOS. It’s Arch bit “just works” Graphical installer, you choose a DE, it automatically installs audio, media codecs etc. But under the hood it’s still Arch so you get daily updates and AUR

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I use Calam Arch Installer which is a graphical installer not unlike those used on other distros but for vanilla Arch. Garuda and Manjaro use the same installer but with their tweaks. Calam installer is standard Arch.

      • @Falmarri
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        I wouldn’t really can arch diy. I run arch. I have way fewer problems with it than any other distro

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        CachyOS. It’s arch based, but the installer is really good, and it has great repos. It also has a lot of optimizations for modern cpus

    • gk99
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Alright, let’s say I’m a Windows user who wants to dual-boot Linux and was planning on Fedora because I’ve heard it’s pretty good for someone transferring over from that OS, but this telemetry bullshit has turned me away.

      What would you say is next best?

      • Billegh
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        Honestly, Ubuntu would be a good place to start learning. Then once you’re feeling brave, Debian. Then once you’re really feeling cocky, Arch will happily take you down a few pegs.

    • Presi300
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      You cannot say that the derivatives of RHEL don’t support foss, as all of them are community made/maintained. Also TECHNICALLY speaking RedHat did not breach the GPL, as it allows for selling of foss projects… Not saying that it’s not a dick move, just saying that it’s TECHNICALLY legal…

    • @Aggravationstation
      link
      English
      -21 year ago

      Yea, OK. I was a Red Hat apologist and kept using Fedora for a while but after this sadly I think it’s time to go back to Debian. Thank God I didn’t install Fedora on my new server which I was going to set up next weekend.

    • @Marduk73
      link
      English
      -61 year ago

      Red Hat is the new Windows.

  • AnonymousLlama
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    Actually out of the loop for this one. What’s the deal with making that on by default, was there any justification?

    • @KingKRool
      link
      251 year ago

      They haven’t made anything. It’s just a proposal right now. Instead of constructively sharing feedback about the default state, people are spouting hyperbole like “Red Hat is Windows”.

      • @itsJoelleScott
        link
        11 year ago

        Ah, thank you for explaining. I don’t follow Linux news as closely as I should, and I wondered if this affects me because I use Fedora.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Honestly I don’t care about the proposal. If it’s just a checkbox to untick on install then it’s not much different from what apps like vlc do.

  • Maximilious
    link
    fedilink
    -41 year ago

    Guess it’s time to migrate my VM servers to a different distro entirely.