• @MotoAsh
    link
    1991 year ago

    Parents who buy their children guns at all need to all be evaluated. There is seriously something wrong with giving children something whos intended purpose is delivering lethal force.

    • @NOT_RICK
      link
      English
      1081 year ago

      I don’t find it weird for hunting, but giving a child unrestricted access to firearms is insane to me given children are not able to assess risk the same way adults do.

      • tim-clark
        link
        fedilink
        791 year ago

        A lot of “adults” don’t seem to assess the risks either.

      • @MotoAsh
        link
        45
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh, I don’t mean temporary custody under controlled and hopefully educated circumstances, but those who hand it over completely. A kid simply does not need that power nor have the responsibility for full time custody.

        Hell, the government wants people 18+ before they’ll hand someone a gun and let them go die for something…

        • 🖖USS-Ethernet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          Smoking and drinking age is 21. Maybe gun ownership age should be bumped up too.

              • @FontMasterFlex
                link
                -41 year ago

                if you can’t make the decision to drink, buy a gun, or whatever else because you’re supposedly not “mature” enough to do, why the fuck should you be trusted with choosing who makes those laws? while you’re at it, raise the age to enroll in the military. if you can go die for your country at 18 you should be able to buy a beer, vote, and buy the gun they’ll hand you at boot.

                conversely if you want to lower the voting age, as some democrats suggest, then so should the drinking age, gun purchasing age etc.

                there’s simply no logic in being ‘mature’ enough for one and not the other.

                • @Zirconium
                  link
                  41 year ago

                  It’s not about principle of freedom or maturity. The legal age of drinking is where it is because of young adults drinking and driving. You can have layers of maturity that isn’t give/take all responsibilities. An 18 year old should be allowed to vote because they’re just as responsible as any adult to provide themselves their own food and shelter. Unless you think it should be illegal to kick someone out until they’re 21.

        • EinatYahav
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Hell, the government wants people 18+

          No, I’m pretty sure that was some ancient Christian pro-lifers who came up with that rule. Government would take people younger if they could.

          • @MotoAsh
            link
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “… if they could.”

            Yea that’s kinda’ EXACTLY the point… they CAN make it that way, but haven’t. The entire point is that modern Republicans are far more despicable than most any kind of politician from history. Yes, that includes slavers.

            It takes an entire additional level of evil to step BACK IN TO social problems, and that’s 100% of the modern GOP platform: bring back problems that were already solved.

        • BeardedBlaze
          link
          21 year ago

          They’ll take you at 17 with parent’s permission.

      • @devnull406
        link
        161 year ago

        Before he passed away, my kids’ grandfather bought all his grandkids their first 22 rifle. Some of the cousins were still infants but he wanted to buy them something. He was a prolific hunter and marksman. My kids guns all lived in the safe until they were old enough to shoot them, and now they live in the safe when not in use. You can give guns to kids all day long, that’s not the problem and the gun is not the problem.

        • @III
          link
          English
          71 year ago

          You can give guns to kids all day long, that’s not the problem and the gun is not the problem.

          The problem is not appropriately assessing whether the child in question she be allowed the gun. Are they responsible, are they going to use it for valid purposes. This holds true for, well, everyone always. A lack of reasonable regulation is the actual problem. I am glad you have responsibly managed the distribution and use of firearms for your children. We should do that for everyone.

          • @FontMasterFlex
            link
            -31 year ago

            A lack of reasonable regulation There are hundreds of firearms laws on the books. What new law is both reasonable and would accomplish anything?

            • @Maggoty
              link
              01 year ago

              Mandatory psych eval and home inspection every 5 years.

              • @FontMasterFlex
                link
                41 year ago

                lol. how? the logistics of personnel alone is never going to happen.

                • @Maggoty
                  link
                  61 year ago

                  It’s almost like we should be getting something for our tax dollars other than a pittance at retirement and a genocide in the middle east.