• @Death_Equity
    link
    799 months ago

    Family values.

    Sex work is work, no shade on her but the hypocrisy is Gates and Co are abhorrent.

      • @Cort
        link
        79 months ago

        Sir, this is a Wendy’s, and I clearly already have a job. Now, do you want fries with that or not?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    409 months ago

    Meh. Lemme know when they have evidence of the minors. I have no problem with adults trading money for sex. Sure, he might have lied about it, but that can be explained by the stigmatization of the act by society.

    Don’t get me wrong. I hate the guy. But this is pretty not-so-damning in my mind.

    • FenrirIII
      link
      209 months ago

      Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. Why isn’t selling fucking legal?

      • @PunnyName
        link
        -19 months ago

        Because if you could buy sex, then the rest of our economy collapses.

        Or only the rich get to indulge while the rest of us are punished.

        Either way. Prolly more options.

        • @Bytemeister
          link
          Ελληνικά
          59 months ago

          It’s a George Carlin quote.

        • @prayer
          link
          29 months ago

          Only the rich get to indulge

          Literally 1984

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      Maybe that would be true if he was personally paying for sex, but he was paying her to have sex with other men. That muddies the waters alot. There’s an assumption of control since he’s rich and well connected. To me this isn’t much different than what Espsein was doing. Flying girls to islands for sexual favors with business partners.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      49 months ago

      Her profile showed 17 years old at the time, but something tells me you aren’t actually looking for the proof, because that already exists.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    309 months ago

    It didn’t matter initially when it was a child, why would it matter now that it’s a woman instead?

    • @PunnyName
      link
      09 months ago

      Because one is acceptable to the GQP. The other is not.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You seem to have some pretty concrete ideas about what our Esteemed Colleagues on the Right Side of the Aisle would accept, that I don’t think they would necessarily share.

        edit: I’m saying they have loose morals 🙄

    • @shalafi
      link
      English
      -159 months ago

      Perhaps read the story next time?

      the woman, who was older than 21 at the time

      This has nothing to do with the allegations about him fucking a 17-yo, who being less than 365-days from majority was hardly a “child”. Illegal and immoral? Of course, and add some more “immoral” on top. Child? Yeah, not really. I was fucking like a jack rabbit at 17.

      As to that case, we got no witnesses. Joel Greenberg (same guy as in this story) was supposed to roll on Gaetz post-conviction. He did not. The woman involved started an OnlyFans site. Not a star prosecution witness, and on top of that, she refused.

      THIS might be something we can nail him with. He’s my Congressman, I’ve been watching and waiting.

  • @psycho_driver
    link
    119 months ago

    Well at least it was a woman and not an underage cuban boy.

    • @Hikermick
      link
      39 months ago

      Maybe if it’s a Lego movie

  • Hegar
    link
    fedilink
    89 months ago

    Surely not child sex trafficker matt gaetz?

  • Optional
    link
    59 months ago

    Pre-emptive pardon!!

    • @HoustonHenry
      link
      39 months ago

      That’ll be…lessee…$2 million please 🫡