Oliver made the proposal on Sunday’s episode of his HBO show Last Week Tonight, saying the supreme court justice had 30 days to accept or it would expire.

The British-born comedian’s offer came after a steady drumbeat of media investigations in the previous several months established that Thomas failed to disclose that political benefactors bought him lavish vacation travel and real estate for his mother. Thomas also failed to disclose – as required – that he allowed school fees for a family member to be paid off and had been provided a loan to buy a luxury motor coach, all after openly complaining about the need to raise supreme court justices’ salaries.

As a result, Thomas’s impartiality came into question after he sided with the contentious ruling that eliminated the federal abortion rights once provided by the Roe v Wade case.

He also recently listened to arguments over whether Donald Trump can be removed from states’ ballots in the presidential election after the former president’s supporters – whom he told to “fight like hell” – staged the January 6 attack at the US Capitol in Washington DC. Thomas resisted pressure to recuse himself from such matters, even though his wife, Ginni Thomas, is a conservative political activist who has endorsed false claims from Trump and his supporters that the 2020 election he lost to Joe Biden was stolen from him.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    2959 months ago

    Associate Supreme Court Justice annual salary: $285,400

    So if he turns it down, he either really likes being a judge (he doesn’t act like it) or he’s got a financial incentive beyond his salary to stay.

    And I’m guessing he’ll turn it down.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        1039 months ago

        Yes, but he also lies all the time, so I wouldn’t exactly take than on face value.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        619 months ago

        I wonder what ways he thinks liberals made his life miserable. Honestly sounds like this idiot doesn’t even know what the word ‘liberal’ means.

        • BarqsHasBite
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          He didn’t like people thinking he got into law school etc because he was black. He fervently hates affirmative action.

          • Snot Flickerman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            48
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            He hates it because he’s literally one of the people whom affirmative action helped put him in a position he is totally unqualified for (Supreme Court Justice).

            His evidence that it is bad and doesn’t work is… himself.

            What was that thing about conservatives and projection… Oh yeah: “It’s always projection.”

            • @grue
              link
              English
              159 months ago

              Maybe initially only conservatives thought that, but as a not-conservative I’ve got to admit that the way he’s been acting is making a more and more compelling case for it.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      569 months ago

      I dunno. Oliver has guaranteed him a cool $1mil per year, until either Thomas or John dies (out of his own pocket no less!!), AND thrown in a brand new, top of the line Prevost Marathon motor coach.

      It’s a mouth-watering deal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        599 months ago

        Which he will turn down. If you watch the episode you’ll see all the perks he enjoys from being who he is. Which of course he’d stop being invited to, if he retired from the position.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          219 months ago

          True (and I watched the episode), but it doesn’t take away from the fact it is a sweet deal. I bet you Thomas considers it, even if he chooses not to take it.

          • @CosmicTurtle
            link
            English
            259 months ago

            It was scary seeing the stark difference between when he was begging his legislative colleagues that they need to raise their pay and his more recent interviews about how they are paid.

            It’s clear as day that even though he isn’t getting paid more, he’s getting paid plenty.

            The funny thing was that I almost couldn’t get a security clearance because I had so much debt in my early career days. The fact that there is zero oversight over the Supreme Court is just baffling.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              39 months ago

              Yup.

              Rules for thee, not for me. Maybe that should become part of the swearing in oath so they can be honest at least once.

        • @BigDiction
          link
          89 months ago

          Conservatives would counter 10M to stay on the court and consider it a deal.

    • Billiam
      link
      479 months ago

      Third option: he turns it down because he likes STIGGINIT too much.

      What’s funny is, NPR did an interview with a guy who wrote a book on Thomas, and one of the things he points out is how much Thomas hates affirmative action because of a deep-seated insecurity about his own accomplishments.

      Which becomes the ultimate irony: the only reason Thomas is on SCOTUS is because Republicans wanted a black man to replace Thurgood Marshall, but without all the pesky “morals” and “ethics.” In other words, he obtained the pinnacle of his career… Because of his skin color.

      No wonder he hates himself.

      • @Nastybutler
        link
        159 months ago

        I truly believe Uncle Ruckus from The Boondocks is the best portrayal of Thomas anyone has done.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      419 months ago

      Even if he decided it was a good deal, if he cares about the legacy of his past decisions at least seeming legitimate, he has to turn it down. We all know he’s for sale, but he loses deniability if he straight up sells out.

      • @A_Random_Idiot
        link
        English
        189 months ago

        if he was concerned with anything he’s done seeming legitimate, He probably wouldnt have taken all the bribes and shit that we know of thus far.

      • Waldowal
        link
        29 months ago

        Should have offered 100 million. You’re right. He won’t sell out his legacy for a million, but I bet he would for 100.

        • Drusas
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          Somehow I don’t think John Oliver can quite afford to straight up offer someone 100 million dollars.

        • @wolfpack86
          link
          49 months ago

          But this is the thing that’s dangerous about this otherwise hilarious premise.

          If you can pay judges to leave so you can stack the court with your people… The court is even more fucked.

            • @wolfpack86
              link
              19 months ago

              I’d guess the shows lawyers looked into this.

    • @foggy
      link
      109 months ago

      Putin has deep pockets.

      • @nomous
        link
        5
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Don’t even need to sell yourself to foreign actors. There’s plenty of cash floating around the Microsofts, Eli Lillys, Berkshire Hathaways, Proctor & Gambles, et al.

        You can take all the “lobbying” you want and remain a Faithful Patriotic Americantm

      • Flying Squid
        link
        109 months ago

        That was my point. Turning it down either means he just loves judging so much that he’s willing to do it until he dies or he has a financial incentive worth more than a million dollars a year.

    • @A_Random_Idiot
      link
      English
      239 months ago

      I’m convinced that Stewart retired cause Oliver stole the source of his power when he left TDS to go to HBO.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        199 months ago

        I’d agree but. Stewart had a much harder job multiple days of the week imo. Oliver gets a week to really write gold. So Stewart still goated imo. Or his writing team was lol

        • Drusas
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Oliver’s team can spend months researching and writing individual episodes. They don’t cram those main segments into a single week of writing.

      • @TheDannysaur
        link
        79 months ago

        Then how do you explain his return to TDS?

          • @A_Random_Idiot
            link
            English
            69 months ago

            Oliver uses its power on sunday, then sleeps.

            Stewart sneaks in to steal a fragment of it before the HBO attack drones catch him. Hence only on mondays, cause he expends the energy before tuesday and cant get more until the next sunday

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
          link
          fedilink
          99 months ago

          It was either that or run for office and Stewart would apparently rather die than accept the biggest landslide victory of our time.

          It’s actually terrifying how amazing he’d be as an ideal president, he’s a man who knows how to put forward a best face for an executive team specialized in different areas of preference and expertise, and he knows how to spot good talent too, that’s literally the two most important things a president needs to be good at, everything else is set dressing as long as you know how to spot folks for your team that know their shit, and know how to translate that shit to a lay-audience.

          Obama got astonishingly little done, but the guy knew how to make a big deal out of what he did get done, he rode Obamacare and killing Bin Laden like he’d been retiring bulls and broncos his whole damn life! Which he kinda had to because 2010 happened.

  • @lennybird
    link
    English
    839 months ago

    I’m just annoyed HBOMax is now delaying pushing John Oliver’s segments to YouTube but I guess it was inevitable…

    • @nutsack
      link
      3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      BitTorrent’s pretty good. YouTube kind of sucks a lot

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -33
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Fuck YouTube. Who cares? That platform needs to go. Hopefully more people do this.

      EDIT: I wonder how many of the people giving me all these the pointless down arrows are the same ones that complain every time a news article shows how shitty YouTube is to its patrons.

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        English
        219 months ago

        What’s the alternative that actually has content?

          • @Soulg
            link
            209 months ago

            So you’re just whining, got it

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -15
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              How’s this whining? YouTube sucks. There doesn’t need to be an alternative for people to leave. Just like Twitter. It’s operated by people that demonstrably don’t care about content creators and in fact- have provenly screwed them over time and again as evidenced in the countless tech articles about them shared here and elsewhere….

              But by all means, don’t let me get in the way of a collective Stockholm syndrome

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                69 months ago

                Stockholm syndrome isnt real my guy, some cops made it up to hand wave why captives called them out for risking their lives more than the kidnappers had.

                Kinda like how youre hand waving people clearly telling you that a shit service still fulfills a service, and not having alternative examples to pivot to means people who need the service filled will use shit service over no service.

      • @nutsack
        link
        11
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        pushing to YouTube is better than not pushing to YouTube.

  • @garretble
    link
    English
    819 months ago

    I’m stealing this joke from someone I saw on bluesky or Masto (I forget), but:

    Why would he take a pay cut?

  • @KursoryGlance
    link
    539 months ago

    Thomas is just going to use this to negotiate better pay from his existing benefactors…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      239 months ago

      That is fine too. Better be more expensive for them.

      However, I’m rather inclined to suspect that they have enough “blackmail” over the course of his life’s proclivity (including some before he even became a judge) hence money is probably not going to sway him that much.

  • @ganksy
    link
    499 months ago

    The hero we want and need. Bless you John Oliver!

  • @reddig33
    link
    499 months ago

    I’ll be surprised if he doesn’t take it.

    • It’s likely a bigger bribe than he’s already getting.
    • He’s old and probably tired of working.
    • it’s an election season and republicans will just stall any new appointments to replace him until after the election.
    • plz1
      link
      English
      309 months ago

      Republicans are not in charge of the Senate.

      • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe
        link
        fedilink
        -10
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The Democrats will pretend their hands are tied and beg maga to allow them to seat someone.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          69 months ago

          Dunno why the down votes. It’s sadly true. They won’t fight as hard as the republicans did to get where we are. And that’s why we are here.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            99 months ago

            Downvoted because it’s a dumb take that is unprovable, and drenched in opinionated rhetoric.

        • @TexasDrunk
          link
          59 months ago

          That’s definitely what they did last time. I don’t think we’ll get to see it, but I would hope they know there are new rules.

      • @nomous
        link
        89 months ago

        Yeah cash is great but power is its own thing and attracts money all by itself. Why sell a guaranteed legacy, a guaranteed mention in history books for a couple mil?

        He doesn’t need paychecks from a comedian, he can get all the paychecks he wants. Quietly, from men in expensive clothes at nice resorts on vacations he’s not paying for. Followed by a wink and a nudge.

        This priest is becoming especially troublesome.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      99 months ago

      The money probably isn’t most of it. Thomas likes the power. He could make more in Congress through insider trading and bribes and then retire. Fucko likes putting his dick on the scale of history to hurt the kind of people he’s used to be: poor.

    • @Furbag
      link
      89 months ago

      I don’t think he’ll take it, not because he doesn’t want to, but he’s acutely aware that public confidence in the judicial system right now is at the lowest it has ever been. Accepting this deal would do even further damage to the image of the court’s impartiality and his own legacy. It would send a message to the nation that the US Supreme Court seats can be bought and have a price, even if they are technically not allowed to accept bribes or gifts for favorable rulings.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        You should watch the episode. Thomas only cares about himself. He doesn’t care about the integrity of the court.

        • @Furbag
          link
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          You should watch the episode.

          I did watch the episode. Clarence Thomas might be a self-serving asshole, but he’s not stupid. Confidence in the judicial is so low that we are perhaps one or two steps away from just having people ignore their rulings. If he took this - and let’s be frank here and call it what it is - bribe, it would spell disaster for the integrity of the courts. The most overt and nationally televised quid-pro-quo exchange possibly ever.

          I’m sure Thomas doesn’t want to retire with a big fat pension paid for by John Oliver if he’s not going to be able to enjoy it if the country falls apart because the last semi-functioning apparatus of government becomes as ineffective and flaccid as the executive or legislative is currently.

  • Vlarb
    link
    fedilink
    English
    469 months ago

    Even if this did top his current bribes, I can’t seem him walking away from the power.

  • @SloppyPuppy
    link
    429 months ago

    Just fundraise like 100 mil to get trump out of the race. Totally worth it and hes gonna take it with both hands.

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        English
        159 months ago

        Yeah. He’d just fight the suit in court for years. And then when ordered to repay her could and have lived off they interest if they didn’t somehow seize it into escrow.

      • @kromem
        link
        English
        99 months ago

        You put it in an escrow account with the condition being that he drops out to get it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Heres an idea. We give trump and others like elon literally all the money in the world, every single cent.

        The economy would collapse in an instant and we can take of our own neighborhoods and communities without needing a money insensitive while the rich can drown in their valueless wealth.

        /non-literal

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      99 months ago

      This is very interesting. With all the crowd funding methods, would it be theoretically possible to put something like this together? Granted, the person has to accept, but imagine being able to pay a politician to just disappear.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        129 months ago

        If it were to actually happen, it’ll just open up a trend of people joining politics and being major asswipes with the sole intention that people buy them out

        • @xantoxis
          link
          12
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          You speak as if this isn’t already happening. Rich corporations hire former US reps and regulators to be “lobbyists” for huge paychecks, but they aren’t really asked to do anything–the real job happens before the big paycheck while the rep is still in office greasing the wheels, knowing retirement will be easy street.

          Meanwhile scoundrels at every level are being loud public fuckheads so they can make a big name and sell books, or merch. They’re getting paid too.

          And these aren’t even the real monsters. The real monsters are the ones who aren’t doing it for money but for more political power.

          Honestly, we should be so lucky as to have a way to buy the political fortunes of these pieces of shit before they have any political influence.

    • @xantoxis
      link
      89 months ago

      Yes, but Trump isn’t the only problem we’re facing. And a lot of the other problems have a path through the supreme court. Let’s do both.

    • @SloppyPuppy
      link
      19 months ago

      I bet nations will also donate to the cause with millions. Fuck it, Ukraine could hand in all that money themselves and itll be worth it for them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    349 months ago

    I didn’t realize the show was back. Outstanding work. The Trump-packed courts are the reason I don’t think the USA can be fixed during my lifetime and will only get worse.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    279 months ago

    I saw this last night! ROFL! John Oliver kept asking how it was legal for him to make the offer! lol. I kinda hope Justice Thomas takes the offer.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      119 months ago

      Contracts can do pretty much anything legal. This is offering money to not work and penalties for this round be repayment. So there isn’t a lot of risk involved at long as someone doesn’t try to screw to receiver through bad contractual language.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        119 months ago

        John was aiming more for the “I can bribe a SCOTUS judge to quit the court and not get into trouble???” part of it.

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    139 months ago

    Cool, but the Republicans would just block any appointments until after the election, like they did with Garland.

    • @HighElfMage
      link
      139 months ago

      Only the Senate gets to block appointments like that, and Democrats control the Senate.

      • @Bwaz
        link
        99 months ago

        Until the usual two republicans-but-only-not-in-name block it.

    • @morphballganon
      link
      -109 months ago

      Maybe Biden could use the same method he used to send weapons to Israel without congressional approval

  • @Reddfugee42
    link
    99 months ago

    Not a chance. That recipient of dei benefits believes he is entitled to tell us what to do forever.