• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14710 months ago

    Sounds like a hell of a lot of money for a CEO who kept insisting that he had to kill 3rd party apps because Reddit still isn’t profitable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8110 months ago

      “Reddit isn’t profitable because leadership is wildly incompetent, so let’s pay them an exorbitant amount of money instead of using that money to properly fix things or make any genuine improvements to anything.”

      -reddit

      • @Got_Bent
        link
        English
        5610 months ago

        It really feels like all corporations do this.

        Then the failed CEO gets another CEO gig because they’ve got “experience”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4010 months ago

      Let’s be real, they did it because they didn’t want people training AI models without paying them. They didn’t give a shit about 3rd party apps.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1410 months ago

        People that want to train AI models on Reddit content can just scrape the site, or use data from archive sites that archive Reddit content.

        • AnyOldName3
          link
          English
          710 months ago

          The archive sites used to use the API, which is another reason they wanted to get rid of it. I always found they were a great moderation tool as users would always edit their posts to no longer break the rules before they claimed a rogue moderator had banned them for no reason, and there was no way within reddit to prove them wrong.

            • AnyOldName3
              link
              English
              210 months ago

              Yeah, the Wayback Machine doesn’t use Reddit’s API, but on the other hand, I’m pretty sure they don’t automatically archive literally everything that makes it onto Reddit - doing that would require the API to tell you about every new post, as just sorting /r/all by new and collecting every link misses stuff.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                210 months ago

                You don’t need every post, just a collection big enough to train an AI on. I imagine it’s a lot easier to get data from the Internet Archive (whose entire mission is historical preservation) than from Reddit.

                The thing I’m not sure about is licensing, but it seems like that’d the case for the whole AI industry at the moment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m convinced there was more to it. Otherwise they’d have worked with the app devs to find a mutually beneficial solution. Instead they just acted like massive, deaf assholes through all the drama, blackout…

        Of course, it’s totally possible they’re also insanely stupid, arrogant assholes.

        • @Buddahriffic
          link
          English
          810 months ago

          It makes the ridiculous prices they were quoting make sense. Because giving API access is giving a key to all that data, which they can then turn around and covertly sell access to. So they priced it so that they wouldn’t have to sell the data at wholesale value to apps that could turn around and undercut their AI training prices.

          It’s the same reason why they were considering blocking Google search because Google (or any search engine) uses a crawler to look at all that data and you can’t allow Google to continue without leaving it open to any other crawler, like say an AI training data crawler.

          Same thing with any push to make users log in to view comment threads (and it wouldn’t surprise me if that’s what Musk was thinking of when he was doing/considering the same with Twitter). If only users can access the comment data, then it’s easier to see when a user is reading too much data, or rate limit them. Also the move towards only showing a bit of a comment thread by default.

          But that data is the only reason people visit the site and provide more data, so I don’t see this problem ever fully going away for them. The problem they are trying to solve is how to give access to enough data to engage users enough to provide more data while preventing AI trainers from getting that same data for free. If I wanted to, I bet I could write something that would fill a database with comment data and metadata while browsing normally in less than a day and then a bit longer to automate the browsing entirely (depending on what kind of bot detection the site uses). There’s no way for Reddit to stop the manual browsing version and the automated one will be an arms race that will also end in no way for it to be stopped because it emulates a real user to an undetectable level.

      • @the_grass_trainer
        link
        English
        210 months ago

        It’ll say “to the moon” with some animation, and then they’ll take away some other feature of the site because it’s “too expensive to maintain”.

    • Brownian Motion
      link
      English
      -1010 months ago

      I’d pick prohibited transaction. I live in AU. NYSE won’t let me trade there.

      Either that or “hate” - all redditors can get involved, but not you because you are not from the US. Sounds like communism.

      • @dasgoat
        link
        English
        2010 months ago

        ‘Sounds like communism’

        Show me people who don’t know what communism, Alex

      • @KoalaUnknown
        link
        English
        510 months ago

        You can trade on the New York Stock Exchange in Australia. I trade foreign stock exchanges all the time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          It’s a bit more complicated… you trade through a broker with trading rights on that exchange. Unless you are a power user on a bloomberg terminal.

          Reddit could direct sell shares to a US resident, I’m pretty sure, as a first party sale.

          • @KoalaUnknown
            link
            English
            210 months ago

            Why would you want to do that. Unless you are trading massive amounts of money, it’s more practical to just use an online broker.

          • @Fog0555
            link
            English
            210 months ago

            That’s exactly how people in the US trade also!

  • @chiliedogg
    link
    English
    3310 months ago

    They lost 93 million on 2023, and paid the CEO more than double that.

    Nope - can’t think of a single thing they could do to make reddit profitable.

    • @Specal
      link
      English
      2310 months ago

      Well kinda but not really, he owns around 4% of Reddit which is where the $193m comes from because of the $5b valuation.

      Still, fuck spez

    • @Sarmyth
      link
      English
      810 months ago

      They paid him just shy of 400k. The stock and options he was given have nothing to do with reported losses. It’s all monopoly money until IPO, them we’ll see what it’s worth.

      • @MataVatnik
        link
        English
        9
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Paying yourself 190 million in stock options when the company is running at a loss is pretty much blatantly admitting that the company is severely overvalued. My guess is that it will tank 90% once it goes public. If not more, Reddit produces nothing inherent of value and they are really hostile to their users.

  • @slimarev92
    link
    English
    3010 months ago

    He wasn’t paid that amount. He got 341,000 in cash and the rest was in stocks and options (which will only be worth that much if the company performs well financially). This us place is just like Reddit, nobody ever reads the article.

    • @nyctre
      link
      English
      3910 months ago

      It doesn’t really need to perform well financially. He can sell everything as soon as it goes public and retire

      • @SkippingRelax
        link
        English
        910 months ago

        But they never do that. Musk could have been supping margaritas on a man made island with oompa loompas in a private ocean a long time ago

        • @Agent641OP
          link
          English
          1010 months ago

          Oompa-loompas are extinct. He needs enough money to clone them from mosquitos trapped in amber.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          He will still be in control of that wealth. It really shouldn’t be treated different from salary compensation

    • @CurbsTickle
      link
      English
      35
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Unable to delete so editing instead. Leaving Lemmy.world due to privacy concerns.

      • @SupraMario
        link
        English
        -710 months ago

        Still not how that works, if he wants cash he has to sell, selling stocks is heavily taxed. Now he can take a loan against the stocks but if they don’t do well then he’s not going to get much for them. It’s a risk and taxes is paid like it or not.

        Still a shit system, but that’s a different discussion, but they pay taxes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2110 months ago

          I wouldn’t say heavily taxed. If he exercised his options more than 6 months ago he’ll pay the flat 15% capital gains tax. Whereas his effective tax rate on his salary will be around 30%

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yeah and he can also use the stocks as collateral on a loan and avoid them all together.

            • @RaoulDook
              link
              English
              510 months ago

              I have read that that’s one of the wealthy’s “big secret” ways to avoid taxes. They allegedly live off of those loans as their spending money, while the value of the investments they use as collateral increases over time, but they don’t pay taxes on the Unrealized gains. And they can keep borrowing more as needed with those same investments as collateral.

              I don’t have the whole scam figured out though. I’m not sure how they pay back the loans without having to cash out something that would generate a tax burden.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                710 months ago

                I’m assuming s long s they spread out payments over time and roll lots of the debt into the next loan.

                That’s how they become too big to fail at their banks. At least that’s the Donald Trump method. His problem is that he has fuck all for collateral at this point.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                410 months ago

                lol just default the loan and let them take the collateral, you have thr money already tax free

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                310 months ago

                Another thing to avoid taxes is donating stock to charities, as you can deduct the market value of the stock rather than just the cost basis.

                Say you buy some stock for $100 and it goes up in value to $400. If you sell it, you have to pay capital gains tax on the $300 gain.

                However, if you donate it, you don’t have to pay any tax and can deduct the whole $400, meaning your taxable income is reduced by $400 (which would be a ~$120 reduction in income tax for someone with a 30% effective tax rate).

                Of course, you still end up with less money than you would have if you didn’t donate. But if you’re going to donate anyways, donating stock with gains is better than donating cash because you’ve already paid income tax on the cash but haven’t paid any tax on the stock gains.

          • @SupraMario
            link
            English
            010 months ago

            If he waits for longer than a year, short term under a year is taxed at normal income rates.

          • falsem
            link
            fedilink
            410 months ago

            It’s taxed as income when you receive it. If you hold onto it for over a year then sell it you pay capital gains (which are lower) on the difference between the grant price and current price (if it went up).

        • Natanael
          link
          fedilink
          English
          710 months ago

          The interest rate on taking loans against assets is usually less than paying the taxes for selling the same assets

        • @CurbsTickle
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Unable to delete so editing instead. Leaving Lemmy.world due to privacy concerns.

          • @SupraMario
            link
            English
            110 months ago

            If they sell after holding it for more than a year, if they short term sell the stock under a year it’s a normal income tax on said stock.

            • @CurbsTickle
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Unable to delete so editing instead. Leaving Lemmy.world due to privacy concerns.

              • @SupraMario
                link
                English
                110 months ago

                I’m not disagreeing with you, I think it’s a shit system as well, I’m just pointing out what a lot of people seem to think is 0 taxes on stocks.

        • @BradleyUffner
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          They can take out loans with the stocks as collateral. The money received from loans isn’t taxable.

          • @SupraMario
            link
            English
            110 months ago

            That still requires you to make sure the stock are worth something, and you have to pay interest on that loan.

            I think people are thinking I’m defending the system, I’m not, I’m just pointing out how it works.

    • deweydecibel
      link
      English
      31
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This place is also just like reddit in that comments like yours seeking to seem smarter than everyone else by pointing out technicalities in the article as evidence everyone has the wrong idea, without appreciating the full context, and deliberately ignoring the overall point.

      Executives paid in stocks and options are completely normal, and those stock options have a value. Moreover, those things were not given to other employees nearly as much as they were given to the CEO.

      The actual dollar amount he receives from Reddit is not what matters. What matters is the amount of compensation given to him in comparison to everyone else at Reddit and to other CEOs at other companies, especially when taking his performance into account.

      The point is Reddit is effectively giving way too much of its value to one person who has done little to actually make it profitable in all the time he’s been there while routinely making mistakes and allowing scandals that have hurt Reddit’s reputation.

      • @fidodo
        link
        English
        310 months ago

        The context is important since it informs us about why he’s doing this, which is probably to further inflate his stock value

    • TheOneCurly
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2510 months ago

      But also Tim Cook’s total compensation for 2022 was $99 million and Satya Nadella’s 2023 was $48 million. Paying him more than CEOs of actually profitable companies and what amounts to nearly 1/4 of revenue is a pretty big outlier.

    • @Kayday
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Steve Jobs was wealthy despite having a salary of $1 per year.

      • @slimarev92
        link
        English
        110 months ago

        Arw you suggesting that reddit shares are going to be worth a lot of money? I see a an 18 year old company that still can’t turn a profit, so I don’t exactly see how the IPO can be a success.

  • @JonnyRobbie
    link
    English
    3010 months ago

    Honestly, I’m kinda looking forward to the IPO - because it might be the last enshittification straw that breaks the camel’s neck that will finally drown reddit for what it has become.

  • @answersplease77
    link
    English
    2310 months ago

    So why does your CEO get paid quarter of a billion a year if they had to hike their APIs unreasonably and kill all 3rd party apps because “reddit wasn’t profitable” despite not paying a dime to the mods running their website niether to contribitors, posters nor users ?!?! Reddit is scummier than Uber

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Seems to me the institutional investors aren’t interested at the price they’re asking.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1510 months ago

      Nah, if you click through to the sign up they ask you for a bunch of personal information on a form hosted on reddit.com and then say “there are a limited number of spots, we will accommodate as many people as we can.”

      A month from now, 99% of people who fill out that form will be “wait listed” but reddit will have their real name and phone number forever. That’s the grift.

  • @buzz86us
    link
    English
    2010 months ago

    While cutting off reddit apps that are better than the bloated shitshow that is the reddit app

  • @fidodo
    link
    English
    1610 months ago

    Most of that money is in stock, so he’s doing this to further inflate his stock value

  • @DannyMac
    link
    English
    1610 months ago

    What’s next? Reddit Coin? NFTs?

  • @dezmd
    link
    English
    1510 months ago

    So my 16 year account with 90k legit comment karma wasnt good enough to be invited?

    Now I dont get to early participate in the fomo panic IPO being forced by investors?

    I could’ve made or lost tens of dollars.

    • @RememberTheApollo_
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m at 10 year with about 500k combined. They sent me one. I laughed. Made me feel about as special as being given a pizza Friday at a job I’d been working for just as long. Actually, I would have been happier with the pizza.

    • snowe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      that’s so weird because I got an email inviting me to participate and I haven’t ever been considered a ‘prolific poster’. I’m only at 60k and 12 years. I had no clue I was invited until I looked in my spam folder.