• @dumpsterlid
    link
    English
    253
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Hi what do you do for work?

    Well, I work for a healthcare company that creates electric wheelchairs and apps to use them.

    Wow that is amazing, that sounds so rewarding! What specifically do you do?

    Thanks! I designed the pricing structure so that each aspect of the wheelchair experience is gated behind carefully designed paywalls that are significant enough to help me my boss get a good bonus at the end of the year but not significant enough that all those poor people out there can’t afford it if they have too. Ideally the cost is always a bit more than people can afford to pay since usually people have more you can squeeze out of their social connections if the need is desperate enough (we are optimizing right now for pricing structures that most encourage customers to make gofundme’s to engage with our products which is cool to be part of a new project).

    ………….

    • @xpinchx
      link
      499 months ago

      This is America 🇺🇸

    • Transporter Room 3
      link
      fedilink
      33
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Honestly the only response to something this callous is “Wow, hey do you wanna check out this really cool blender?” and then shove your Defense Blender into their face.

    • @gmtom
      link
      149 months ago

      I genuinely don’t understand how people that work for companies like that can sleep at night. Like no matter how much evidence I see that the vast majority of people don’t put any effort or conscious thought into being a “good” person and only think about themselves and maybe their close family, I just can’t accept it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        A spouse, housing, and 2.5 kids is quite a lot of motivation for people to work in the coal mines knowing they’ll be at high risk of lung cancer.

        Now switch the damage to groups unseen instead of yourself. Yep… People just trying to survive.

        It fucking sucks.

      • @dumpsterlid
        link
        English
        59 months ago

        I guess it’s up to us to make it a bit harder for them to sleep at night.

      • @RizzRustbolt
        link
        29 months ago

        All the stuff like that is done by folks on the Bastard Committee. While the programming and stuff is done in pieces small enough to not get recognized, and then later assembled by the Bastard Programmer.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2169 months ago

    My wife and I went all out for our first born and as a baby monitor we got a MIKU. It is able to track the baby’s breathing without any accessories and one of the key reasons I chose MIKU was that even though it was expensive it did not have a subscription model. BECAUSE I FUCKING HATE SUBSCRIPTIONS. Fast forward to Summer of 2023 and MIKU went bankrupt. The company that bought them tried to salvage it by including a $10/month subscription for everything except for the main camera function (which they cannot legally remove). And the way they tried to enforce it is by pushing an app update that blocks said features. I just went on APK Mirror and downloaded the previous version and turned off auto updates. And everything works perfectly. Thank you android and thank you APK Mirror.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      649 months ago

      I wish android natively has a roll back option to un-update apps… But that would be too user-friendly, I suppose.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        239 months ago

        No, that would use up too much storage lol. Also, 99% of people don’t update their apps manually, instead, they just let the Google Playstore handle it whenever it feels like it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        159 months ago

        Android doesn’t allow you to install an older version of an app over a new version. F-Droid has the UI for it but it doesn’t work, the security policy prevents the install.

        There’s probably a good reasons for that, but I can’t think of it other than the flawed reasoning of “it can’t be a good idea to roll back an update”. I’m sure even Google can imagine a situation where, say, an app update got infected with malware or something like that and it’s in everyone’s best interest to roll back to the previous version until a clean update arrives. Preventing rollback means the only way to do that is for the user to manually uninstall the app and reinstall the desired version.

        Okay, I can think of a possible reason for that policy: it prevents malware from downgrading a target app to a former (official, signed) version which can be exploited. I don’t know how realistic this scenario is, though.

        • @herrvogel
          link
          59 months ago

          You don’t need to implement support for rollbacks to handle those “emergency” rollbacks. You could just push a “new” version that’s actually the last known good version, and the phone would happily install it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You can only do this if you have the signing keys. If the store wants to do this for users (say, if the developer is incapacitated somehow) they can’t.

            Edit: I’m actually not 100% sure if the signing keys are required for changing just the version number, but I assume so

            • @herrvogel
              link
              39 months ago

              That sounds about right for Google play. That said, the point still stands. If Google wanted to implement such a feature, it could probably be done by onky patching things on their store backend. I’m sure it wouldn’t be a trivial change, but still it wouldn’t need to touch the OS itself. Probably. As far as the phone is concerned, it would still be disallowing rollbacks as usual.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          Apps (almost) always take upgrades into consideration when it comes to migrating data. However they (almost) never take downgrades into consideration.

          This is part standard across all software. Migrating forward can already be difficult, but backwards can be impossible, especially if data was lost in the move forward.

  • body_by_make
    link
    fedilink
    64
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    300 euros, not dollars. This also means the America jokes aren’t quite right in this case. 300 euros is about $326

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    529 months ago

    I once interviewed at a (very) big usenet provider. The job was perl, I knew perl, must be fun.

    No.

    The job was to implement the byzantine B.S. “discounts” and plan-pricing “deals” that the sales team came up with to most effectively screw the customer.

    I declined.

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
      link
      28
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Which is especially hilarious, because Usenet is such a niche thing that the only people using it pretty much already know what they want from the service and know how much it should cost.

      “Hey, we’ve made this super niche, not at all necessary, and easily avoidable service. Let’s do everything we can to be hostile towards our customers!”

  • @SpiceDealer
    link
    329 months ago

    You wouldn’t run a script to ensure the proper functioning of your lungs.

  • Ragdoll X
    link
    32
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    CAPITALISM BABY!


    Edit: European capitalism bad too but I can’t find a funny GIF of the EU flag so this one is staying ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      239 months ago

      Yet the price is in euros…

      Point being, the US is fucked but we don’t have the monopoly on it.

    • @umbraroze
      link
      39 months ago

      I swear none of the American technobros went “paywalling a wheelchair with Bluetooth bullshit and doing screwy insurance shenanigans? damn, that’s a little bit too fucked up, even for us”. Instead, they went “that’s ingenious, why didn’t we think of it first?”

  • @Mr_Blott
    link
    21
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’ve been partially deaf my whole life, and decided to get hearing aids.

    Decided to go for the best of the best at the time, €4k for the pair, because they were Bluetooth compatible

    Test drove them for a month for free, it takes that long to get used to them after a lifetime of hearing problems. Then bit the bullet and paid for them.

    A month later I asked the audiologist how to connect my Android phone because it would be useful for taking calls

    He said it wasn’t possible because Apple had patent-trolled Bluetooth connections to hearing aids and at the time, was blocking other phones from doing it.

    Greedy Apple cunts can go fuck themselves

    • @dumpsterlid
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      Another reason not to trust audio devices that can only connect through bluetooth, bluetooth is WAYYYY too easy for capitalism to break compatibility with in a way that was impossible when devices were expected to have 3.5mm audio jacks.

    • @AeonFelis
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      Greedy Apple cunts can go fuck themselves

      Why would they fuck themselves when they can fuck you instead?

      • @Mr_Blott
        link
        79 months ago

        Never have I ever bought a single thing from those mouldy cuntflaps

        • @AeonFelis
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          And yet they have still managed to fuck you up by preventing you from using your Bluetooth compatible hearing aids with your Android phone.

  • @Hiro8811
    link
    39 months ago

    Umh…when you install it from Play Store it’s still downloads an apk, you probably meant pirating