The full transcript undercuts Hur’s claims that Biden could not remember his son’s death and had “poor” memory

The full transcript of President Joe Biden’s five-hour interview with special counsel Robert Hur’s investigators “paints a more nuanced portrait” of Biden’s memory than the special counsel’s report, according to The Washington Post, which noted that “Biden doesn’t come across as being as absent-minded as Hur has made him out to be.”

The transcript “could raise questions about Hur’s depiction of the 81-year-old president as having ‘significant limitations’ on his memory,” according to The Associated Press.

Hur in his report declined to charge Biden, arguing that it would be difficult to convince a jury to convict with a memory that the special counsel described as “faulty” and “poor,” noting that Biden could not recall when his son Beau died or when he served as vice president.

But Biden said exactly when his son died in the interview.

  • @ceenote
    link
    198
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    This whole kerfuffle seems so stupid. Biden didn’t take any memory tests, didn’t get evaluated by a psychiatrist or any memory experts, and nobody authoritative on the topic of memory or brain function was involved.

    A fair and accurate headline would have been “Republican lawyer thinks Biden is senile.” A republican has that opinion? Stop the fucking presses

    • @Ciderpunk
      link
      52
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Even “liberal” media in the US loves Trump and will print anything that might further the close race narrative, regardless of veracity.

      Trump gets eyeballs on news, which directly leads to ad revenue. US media is addicted to Trump as a means of selling ad space and would gladly let the country burn down for a few extra ad sales.

      • @ceenote
        link
        159 months ago

        It’s fortunate that most voters find him so repulsive now that a bigger presence in the news seems to be bad for Trump nowadays.

        • @NocturnalMorning
          link
          169 months ago

          I miss the days when he was just the guy that hosted the apprentice show and was know for the catch phrase “you’re fired”. Simpler times

    • @Sanctus
      link
      English
      219 months ago

      The only way out of this is education. This drivel is maddening. Human minds are as wasted and polluted as the environment.

      • @lennybird
        link
        English
        159 months ago

        I’ve long been advocating for the Democratic party to adopt a Teacher’s classroom mindset. Think about what Bernie, Warren, and Porter did in basically elevating the understanding of civics, history, and current-events of our country.

        Use all donation money to just honestly spoonfeed Americans vital information one bite-size ad at a time.

    • @tacosplease
      link
      99 months ago

      Even that title would be inaccurate. He just used the situation to lie that he thinks Biden is senile to hurt Biden’s chances of getting elected again. It’s a blatant violation of ethics.

    • @gastationsushi
      link
      7
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      He doesn’t think Biden is senile, he even said Biden has a near photographic memory dealing with the House. Hur misrepresented the truth then pretends the “I don’t recall” defense is not the most common defense used in interviews with feds.

      An accurate headline would have been: Member of ratfucker party tried to ratfuck Biden.

  • mozz
    link
    fedilink
    55
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Full transcript. The excerpt in question starts on page 82 of the first interview session.

    I actually really recommend reading for a few pages. Obviously it’s interesting to see the primary source and judge Hur’s claim about Biden not remembering when his son died, or flip to some random page and read a little and make an evaluation of Biden’s mental fitness. But the little section that begins with talking about Beau dying was just really unexpected to me.

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        329 months ago

        My favorite moment of the 2020 campaign was during the debate, Trump was mudslinging something or other about Hunter and Biden full on stopped, looked dead into the camera, and made it explicitly clear how much he cared for his son and would support him through his problems. It was a great thing to see.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          It’s a tie with the time when Trump was trumpeting and Biden basically said “whatever, man” and shut him down like a parent to a goofy child.

          But I think I’m having trouble remembering the details, so 1) I’m out as prez and 2) anyone remind me?

      • @Coach
        link
        English
        139 months ago

        Agreed. It’s all projection with these dimwits. They wish they were as sharp as Biden, but most of them were in cognitive decline before birth.

      • @dirthawker0
        link
        119 months ago

        He’s had a lot of terrible things happen to him with regards to family, and he strikes me as someone whose tragedies stay close to his heart and remain fresh. He’s very human. I’m okay with him forgetting which year he lost Beau, because I sometimes get mixed up on the year I lost my mom (5 years ago) and I never remember the exact year my dad passed away (20+ years ago).

  • rivermonster
    link
    309 months ago

    Is there a law that’s been broke here, even if it’s just defamation or something? I’d love to see this asshole prosecuted.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      659 months ago

      there is a solid case of defamation.

      He used a position of authority that’s supposed to have been neutral to create a false impression out of political motivations. never mind that it wasn’t his job and he’s not qualified in any case to make such an assessment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        169 months ago

        Oh boy can’t wait to see this one slog its way through 32 courts over the next 19 years and end in an unsatisfactory conclusion a decade after all parties involved have already died

      • @agent_flounder
        link
        English
        149 months ago

        I’d settle for fired but this hack needs to face some consequences.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          119 months ago

          fired is just the first step. he needs to be investigated by somebody independent to see if his other decisions are also politically motivated as well as if there wasn’t any sort of corruption in this particular case.

          And, anyone found to behaving in a corrupt manner needs to be dealt with in the appropriate manner. (I.E, jail time.)

        • FartsWithAnAccent
          link
          fedilink
          49 months ago

          He already resigned and will likely go to some cushy well paid gig he may or may not have been promised.

      • TurtleJoe
        link
        29 months ago

        For defamation you have to prove that he lied, and that he knew he lied. Has nothing to do with qualifications or motivation.

  • @Rapidcreek
    link
    79 months ago

    Bet Hur thought it was easy to face a congressional committee as he was sitting on his couch.