• @someguy3
    link
    90
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    100%. If they think life starts at conception then the pill, IUDs, and plan B are out. Then we’ll see the mental gymnastics over condoms.

    • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
      link
      English
      369 months ago

      They’ll never ban condoms. This is all about controlling women, not sex.

      • @someguy3
        link
        58
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The religious right thinks premarital sex is a sin. And they are all about imposing their views on others.

        • @rayyy
          link
          109 months ago

          The religious right thinks YOUR premarital sex is a sin. They are totally fine with THEIR premarital/adulterous/rape sex.

      • Melkath
        link
        fedilink
        23
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        A common misconception is that conservative/religious men in the lower ecclons aren’t similarly oppressed.

        The truth is that sweeping populations of men are controlled by the higher ups in those groups.

        It’s the leaders controlling “the rabble”, not all the men controlling all the women.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          319 months ago

          If a peasant feels superior to his wife, he’ll kick her when the master kicks him. Having women at the bottom of the pile makes it easier for the elite to maintain power.

          • Melkath
            link
            fedilink
            69 months ago

            If a peasant feels superior to his wife, he’ll kick her when the master kicks him.

            When the woman is made to “be lesser” and the man is made to go to the church, the man is broken down all day, and he goes home to his wife who he proceeds to break down.

            When “the master” kicks him, he kicks her.

            I’m not saying to not stand up for the oppressed women. I’m saying encourage the women to see it and escape it.

            I’m also saying 50 men tops in these circles are “higher up”, and 5 of them are “top”, and the other 50,000 abused and oppressed men also need to see it and escape.

    • @DillyDaily
      link
      29 months ago

      Can you explain how the pill and IUD are out?

      The combined oral contraceptive pill suppresses ovulation, there’s nothing to conceive with.

      Copper IUDs denature the head of the sperm, meaning they are no longer able to fertilise an egg.

      In both instances, there’s either a no egg, or no viable sperm. It’s no different to having sex while infertile (is that a crime too? Because if it is I’d like to see them try and stop me)

      I can see how the pill could end up on the chopping block, as it’s secondary method of action is to prevent the uterine lining thickening enough to support implantation of a fertilised egg, but copper IUDs prevent contraception, so life never begins, and thus nothing is “murdered”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        339 months ago

        Oh the answer is quite simple they will be “out” because they enable godless whores to have sex outside of marriage without consequences. And by consequences we mean forced conception and birth and with any luck the mutilation and/or death of the woman if anything goes wrong.

        As Jesus intended. Next question.

        • @DillyDaily
          link
          149 months ago

          Ah thank you, I was using too much logic and failed to remember that misogynistic laws aren’t made from a position of reason.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        179 months ago

        Right, this is the logical way to look at it.

        Too bad these forced birth fanatics don’t give a shit about logic.

        It’s simply about control and punishment.

  • SolidGrue
    link
    English
    689 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • @ganksy
    link
    25
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    There. Right there. That’s your campaign rally call.

    “Contraception is next.”

    It sucks but fear will get everyone to the polls better than anything else. Please stop nursery rhymes and name calling bs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      “would you force your daughter to deliver her rapist’s baby, or else go to prison for murder”

  • @njm1314
    link
    249 months ago

    These headlines keep saying fears as if it wasn’t said outright bye Alito and his friends. Threats. That’s the word they’re looking for. Threats that contraception could be next.

    • @MB420GFY
      link
      39 months ago

      threats against the citizens. a handful of people that can be counted on one hand are willing and eager to cause the suffering of millions. the answer seems obvious to me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    199 months ago

    From the party that brought us the hit “don’t take our guns”, comes their next single, “we’re coming for your condoms.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      Where in the constitution does it say:
      …the right of the people to keep and wear Condoms, shall not be infringed.

      Hmm?

      /s

  • [email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    159 months ago

    If I (with consent) spray cum all over my wife, have I angered god the government with my seed? If so, who do I visit to obtain a permit for bukkake? Do each of us have to get a permit or can I put it under an llc? I don’t want to have to scoop it off and into her.

  • Dettweiler
    link
    99 months ago

    Ahh, so this is how they’re going to fix the declining birth rate.

    • @jeffwOP
      link
      119 months ago

      God forbid we just let immigrants in, they’ll steal our jobs. We need to make more Americans (white people) to take those jobs

  • Melkath
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    To be fair, I am humbled because while I know IVF has been banned in a misguided attempt to ban abortions, I am team stop breeding, so I have enjoyed that self inflicted gunshot wound on the right.

    Makes me see how I’m opposite aligned on the topic, not just disagreeing with their point.

    • SolidGrue
      link
      English
      139 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        English
        99 months ago

        Oh, they already have that. It’s why so many of the abortion bans don’t have an exception for rape. Republicans cannot imagine passing on their genes any other way.

        • SolidGrue
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          deleted by creator

      • Melkath
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I mean… I agree.

        A sperm isn’t a human. An egg isn’t a human. An embryo isn’t a human.

        The laws are quite frankly assanine.

        Condoms, birth control, and safe abortions for all.

        I pause a bit at girls popping morning after pills like tic tacs. I don’t think they are meant for that. I think the aforementioned would serve those ladies better, but I won’t stand in their way.

        As a dude, I have a little but not a lot of say in all that.

        What I sure as shit know is that no man has the right to force a woman to incubate a child, and the way I word that highlights how I think the world is fucked, it’s overpopulated, our education and social services are quite frankly shit, and we don’t need children being brought into this dumpster fire.

        I hope for a day where that isn’t such a horrible idea, but that day isn’t today.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          To be clear, I don’t think many ladies are using plan b flavored tic tacs as a form of birth control. If even just for the reason that it would be extremely costly compared to IUD/the shot/the pill. They also have some not amazing side effects.

          The main reason I point this out, is because it’s been a piece of misinformation floated by the right. Right up there with suggesting some women use abortion as their main form of birth control.

        • SolidGrue
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • Melkath
            link
            fedilink
            -19 months ago

            Don’t ask me about Trump v Biden v anything else.

            Then you won’t like my vote as much.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              79 months ago

              By throwing away your vote you are enabling a traitor to seize power and put an end to our freedom. Congrats

              • Melkath
                link
                fedilink
                -49 months ago

                By casting a vote for a right wing genocidal Democrat, you are casting a vote for right wing genocidal maniacs to run this country. Congrats.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          09 months ago

          A sperm isn’t a human. An egg isn’t a human. An embryo isn’t a human.

          I agree with your point but I hate the way you phrased it. The things you mentioned aren’t people, but sperm, eggs, and embryos all belong to a specific species, so if a human sperm, human egg, and human embryo aren’t human, I don’t know what you’d call them to distinguish them from their counterparts from other species.

          • Melkath
            link
            fedilink
            09 months ago

            “Isn’t a life”?

            But we aren’t talking about cat IVF, so the distinction isn’t needed.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              A human embryo is human regardless of whether we’re talking about other species or not. So is a human corpse. I’ve also seen people say an embryo, egg, etc. isn’t alive, which is patently false; they can die, so they’re alive. Nonhuman beings can’t be people, and nonliving things can’t be people, but being human and being alive aren’t the traits that matter, except as they relate to being a person.

              That’s why I’m suggesting “not a person” is the right language to use, because we’re talking about the concept of personhood, which is what we use to distinguish entities with rights from those without.

              • Melkath
                link
                fedilink
                -19 months ago

                Imma be real here, imo, all of what you just said is gobbledygook.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  09 months ago

                  I’m not sure why you felt the need to tell me your command of English is poor, but you do you.