• @Num10ck
    link
    English
    3410 months ago

    ah yes the eternal debate on tolerance of evil.

    • @RadicalEagle
      link
      2910 months ago

      I think you can “love” someone without tolerating their nonsense. It’s all about being willing to find a consensual way of interacting. Theoretically it may be impossible, but we can still try.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1210 months ago

        Ironically this is the whole ‘love the sinner, not the sin’ bit that Christians love to use to excuse their own intolerance.

        • @RadicalEagle
          link
          410 months ago

          Yeah, I think a lot of modern Christians are unaware of how masochistic and sadistic they really are. They get so hung up on the idea that they have a “get out of jail free” card that it justifies all the rest of their behavior, even when that behavior is explicitly called out in their manual lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        I have an ex who cheated on me. I’m not holding on to anger about it, I do honestly hope they’ve found happiness, but I want nothing to do with them again and if they showed up at my door I would tell them to leave.

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      2610 months ago

      Yeah, the paradox of tolerance.

      My favorite solution that I’ve heard, is to treat tolerance not as a moral imperative, but rather as a social contract.
      Anyone who is tolerant will have tolerance extended to them. Those who are intolerant, on the other hand, can fuck right off.

      • @LwL
        link
        6
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yes, I’ve never really seen the paradox as a paradox for that reason. The question, rather, should be what precisely we require from the social contract. The old question of “where is the line at which point my freedom impacts your freedom”. But no matter where that line is, it means that if someone spews hate, you’re allowed to respond in kind

        (Morally, that is. If it’s covered by law then legally it should be handled through the justice system and responding in kind would fall under vigilante justice)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        They did that in east europe (fucking off), founded ISIS, flooded an area with drugs and overran it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yeah the Internet has insulated people from how a society works. They can “fuck off”… to where? Somewhere they’ll still vote and encourage people to follow their example? Somewhere without people telling them they’re wrong where they can become more and more extreme?

          It’s like prison. Yeah let’s take all the people that have a proclivity for crime and put them together. Then teach them to obey the system by using it to punish and traumatize them. After all, they deserve it. They’ll realize that, any day now.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        The way I practice it is that everyone gets a basic level of tolerance. Free speech, basic human rights, and a low level of respect and decency. But until you treat others the same there will be a social friction wherever you go and eventually a hard line. Like, no, we don’t want you in here if you’re just going to be an asshole everyday. Come back in a week and we’ll see if you’ve learned some self-control.

    • Zloubida
      link
      910 months ago

      To love someone is sometimes to say them that their actions are evil.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -110 months ago

        No I’m pretty sure its more about telling them everything that sucks about them is totally fine and even good actually.

        • Flax
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          It’s been 2000 years, how have we not gotten the hang of this already

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Pretty sure love is more than 2000 years old.

            Unless you believe in incredibly-young-earth creationism, where the OP and all your memories older than dinner last night are just a lie planted here by god to trick us into thinking the world is more than 16 hours old.

            • Flax
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              What is blud yapping about 🗣️🗣️🗣️

                • Flax
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  010 months ago

                  I’m talking about interpretation of Jesus’ words (•-•")

        • @chiliedogg
          link
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          He and Kevin Conroy retired the voices of Bats and Joker but came back several times. They retired after Arkham Asylum and came back for Arkham Knight (Origin had different VAs), and they both came back for Killing Joke as well, and their final act together was the Crisis trilogy. The last part is expected to release this year, so we have one last adventure with Kevin’s Batman.

          After Kevin’s death I think the retirement may stick for Hamill. He’s said before that he wouldn’t do Joker without Conroy.

    • @jenny_ball
      link
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      there’s a new he man? lolll

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      All monarchies are illegitimate, the warring nobles will not spared from the guillotine just because they look good in a leather loincloth and someone gave them a magic sword

  • @Sam_Bass
    link
    1610 months ago

    Work your fingers to the bone what do you get