• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    881 month ago

    You could try 15 FPS and I bet it would look exactly the same, this industry is just rotten. The insatiable search for higher and higher FPS counts is just nonsensical smh

    • SuiXi3D
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’d argue that 45fps should be the norm. Anything much higher than 60 and the average person doesn’t gain anything from it. Anything lower is tough for some people to deal with. 45 is a good middle ground, I think.

      Unless you make your living playing competitive games, you don’t need 573830575fps.

      EDIT: Refined my statement to make more sense. 5am brain didn’t realize it needed to go back to bed before making comments.

      • @cosmicrookie
        link
        191 month ago

        I am very confused about your use of the word ‘minimum’, in combination with the rest of your message

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yeah, did op mean maximum or somethin ? But even that wouldn’t make sense as they said bare minimum

        • SuiXi3D
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          Yeah, sorry. Early morning brain needed more sleep before making comments. I refined my original comment to make more sense.

      • @Viking_Hippie
        link
        81 month ago

        Personally I’d agree that 45 is the minimum, but I do feel the difference at higher FPS up to 80-90 or so.

        I’d agree that anything above that is only markedly different for eSport athletes and hummingbirds, though 😁

          • @Viking_Hippie
            link
            11 month ago

            Dunno, are you absolutely certain that you’re 0% hummingbird?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 month ago

              I dunno but I really was chasing after that pixel response time. The more accurate the pixel draw and the lower the latency the less of a headache I get from playing games. I’m incredibly happy with my OLED though big upgrade from an IPS.

              I thought the va panel looked a little nicer but made me real sick feeling with the pixel overshooting and the trails every time the camera moved. Smooth scrolling text in some cases were really tough too on VA.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Don’t feel high FPS to be a wasted effort.
                Here, just scrolling through this page, I can feel the difference between 60FPS and 100FPS.

                I can scroll much faster while also being able to read it. On the 60FPS monitor, I just prefer to alternate between scrolling and reading.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  Yeah it’s definitely easier to skim text while scrolling. It’s a lot less jittery for sure.

      • Ephera
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        Their comment was tongue-in-cheek, I’m pretty sure.

        Yes, higher FPS absolutely results in better motion clarity. In particular, 15 FPS is so low that it’s likely to be perceived as individual pictures rather than continuous motion.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    361 month ago

    This is very misleading. Usually 60 FPS looks worse (especially on consoles and older PCs) since you have to lower settings.

    So clearly 30 FPS is superior.

    /s

  • N3Cr0
    link
    171 month ago

    Both images scroll smoother on my phone, since the screen runs at 90 FPS.

  • @hperrin
    cake
    link
    141 month ago

    If this were on a cheap Chinese graphics card box, the 30 FPS picture would be blurry.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Well, with how common TAA (temporal anti-aliasing) is, 30fps actually would be more blurry. It’d be reasonably accurate, though misleading.

  • @Sam_Bass
    link
    -151 month ago

    A still image is not the right way to illustrate framerate differences

  • @TehBamski
    link
    -401 month ago

    Looks the same… because it’s the same frame lol. Golden.

      • @TehBamski
        link
        -191 month ago

        … uh yeah. I got the joke. Not sure why people downvoted but w/e.

        • @Skipcast
          link
          English
          201 month ago

          Sarcasm does not translate well over text unless it’s super obvious

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            They even wrote “golden” at the end, implying that they had a good laugh and this meme made their day brighter, life better, grass a little greener. I didn’t read their post in a negative way thanks to that word!

    • @Downcount
      link
      151 month ago

      You fool!

      As you can clearly see in the lower right section, they are different frames.