• @[email protected]
        8•9 months ago

        (MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn’t give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.

        Instead you’d get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2

        And that’s not even the correct formula. It’s

        E^2 = (mc(2))2 + (pc)^2

        You can’t just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).

        The way to remember this is that it’s equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).

        So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.

        • @[email protected]
          3•9 months ago

          In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)

          • @[email protected]
            3•9 months ago

            Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?

            And where does the O(v^4) term come from?

    • Redjard
      4•9 months ago

      This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d’Alembert operator at the end

    • Norgur
      48•9 months ago

      Sounds like some bullshit artist motivational speaker

          • MubelotixOP
            3•9 months ago

            Bitcoiners are old-school, serious people. They highly dislike such bullshit as they have seen the entire “crypto” shitshow, and the AI bullshit is similar in many ways

        • @[email protected]
          5•9 months ago

          Basically the same is happening to boomers, e. g. in Europe, too. Also ageism is happening here too. I don’t know, how much worse it is over on your part of the planet, but here you’re also not taken seriously when you’re young

      • @UckyBon
        English
        1•9 months ago

        Nothing. There is a lot of anti-asian racism going on here on Lemmy.

    • @[email protected]
      10•9 months ago

      I’ve heard about an extended version of the equation:
      E2 = m2c4 + p2c2
      Or E = (m2c4 + p2c2)1/2

      If so, AI = (m2c4 + p2c2)1/2 - mc2

      I may have the capabilities to be a technology management consultant

  • TimeSquirrel
    42•9 months ago

    So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood…

  • @[email protected]
    41•9 months ago

    As I said in another thread where this was posted, that original post has the distinctive voice of ChatGPT. Could be another similar model, but I’d bet money that was written by an LLM.

  • @[email protected]English
    38•9 months ago

    LinkedIn is just another Microsoft-owned account you should just delete for your sanity

  • Ayumu Tsukasa
    26•9 months ago

    I love that’s it’s not “what are you on about?” it’s just a general what

    • @Jimmyeatsausage
      8•9 months ago

      I mean, the equation isn’t wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.

  • @DaddleDew
    11•9 months ago

    When the marketing guy tries to do a job meant for the engineering department.

  • @ikiddEnglish
    10•9 months ago

    Thanks for listening to my TedX talk, which I paid to present.

    • @[email protected]
      2•9 months ago

      I paid to watch it! Hey, wait a second… Do you think Mr. XTalk could be just trying to take our money while building a disinformation platform of unchecked greed?

  • @[email protected]
    7•9 months ago

    Ha! “Consultant / Technology Manager” – pretty sure he’s just working on the next buzzword buffet to justify his bloated comp package.

    Oh well, gives me an excuse to link this Weird Al song that makes far more sense.