• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 months ago

        (MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn’t give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.

        Instead you’d get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2

        And that’s not even the correct formula. It’s

        E^2 = (mc(2))2 + (pc)^2

        You can’t just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).

        The way to remember this is that it’s equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).

        So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?

            And where does the O(v^4) term come from?

    • Redjard
      link
      fedilink
      42 months ago

      This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d’Alembert operator at the end

  • velox_vulnus
    link
    fedilink
    492 months ago

    Let me guess, some Indian boomer? They come up with the wildest shit.

    • Norgur
      link
      fedilink
      482 months ago

      Sounds like some bullshit artist motivational speaker

          • MubelotixOP
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            Bitcoiners are old-school, serious people. They highly dislike such bullshit as they have seen the entire “crypto” shitshow, and the AI bullshit is similar in many ways

      • velox_vulnus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 months ago

        I am Indian myself, so I have a better understanding about the internet sub-culture intrinsic to my country. This is a neutral stereotype about ‘WhatsApp Unkils’. It is a counter-reaction to ageism towards younger people, whose intelligence is mocked, simply because they’re younger - the Asian culture of “elders are always right” snubs Gen-Y, Z and younger folks. Now that internet has blown up in India, old people who are literate and take pride in this sort of elitism are embarrassing themselves with their “confidently incorrect” takes on the internet.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          Basically the same is happening to boomers, e. g. in Europe, too. Also ageism is happening here too. I don’t know, how much worse it is over on your part of the planet, but here you’re also not taken seriously when you’re young

      • @UckyBon
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Nothing. There is a lot of anti-asian racism going on here on Lemmy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’ve heard about an extended version of the equation:
      E2 = m2c4 + p2c2
      Or E = (m2c4 + p2c2)1/2

      If so, AI = (m2c4 + p2c2)1/2 - mc2

      I may have the capabilities to be a technology management consultant

  • TimeSquirrel
    link
    fedilink
    412 months ago

    So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    412 months ago

    As I said in another thread where this was posted, that original post has the distinctive voice of ChatGPT. Could be another similar model, but I’d bet money that was written by an LLM.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    382 months ago

    LinkedIn is just another Microsoft-owned account you should just delete for your sanity

  • Ayumu Tsukasa
    link
    fedilink
    262 months ago

    I love that’s it’s not “what are you on about?” it’s just a general what

    • @Jimmyeatsausage
      link
      82 months ago

      I mean, the equation isn’t wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.

  • @DaddleDew
    link
    112 months ago

    When the marketing guy tries to do a job meant for the engineering department.

  • @ikidd
    link
    English
    102 months ago

    Thanks for listening to my TedX talk, which I paid to present.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I paid to watch it! Hey, wait a second… Do you think Mr. XTalk could be just trying to take our money while building a disinformation platform of unchecked greed?

  • @berkeleyblue
    link
    72 months ago

    He should have let an AI proofread this…

    • @AdrianTheFrog
      link
      English
      112 months ago

      It really reads like it was written by AI. I’ve never been to linkedin, maybe everyone talks like that there but it really sounds like it was written by ChatGPT