• @WhatIsThePointAnyway
    link
    English
    1134 months ago

    De-centralization and open source was always the better way. Technology started on this path and the corporate powers have done everything they can to sabotage and destroy open tech.

    • @CitizenKong
      link
      English
      304 months ago

      Been this way with every new tech I reckon. See also DVD burners and DRM/regional codes.

      • @Aux
        link
        English
        9
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah, I find it funny that people don’t remember DVD DRM. I guess it wasn’t noticeable to Americans, but you move from Latvia to the UK and suddenly all your movies are duds. You can at least use a VPN today to circumvent this bull shit in many cases, no such luck back then.

        P.S. What was even worse for people living in xUSSR countries is that part of DVDs came from Russia (region 5) and part came from Europe (zone 2, because many xUSSR countries were assigned zone 2). The same was true for DVD players. So it was always a puzzle what to buy. Fuck this shit.

  • @alexc
    link
    English
    764 months ago

    The problem you are describing is not malware or viruses. They’re just the tools.

    The problem is capitalism, which turns everything free into something on which a profit can be made

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    684 months ago

    That’s why Foss will always be better, and we need to support these developers. They also need to protect their software better from capitalist ghouls that will profit from it for free

    • Programmer Belch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      344 months ago

      Protecting FOSS is impossible, there will always be a company that uses your codebase, credits you and includes advertisements to your program.

      We need to make using FOSS projects the default and using the corporate options as the backup option.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        164 months ago

        What I mean is better licenses that make sure you get paid if companies profit from it, and harsher penalties for those that get caught infringing the license

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Such a license wouldn’t fit the free software or the open source definitions, but I find it interesting that there has been a small, yet apparently growing, group of people unsatisfied with our current open licensing, for different reasons, and proposing new ideas and concepts that wouldn’t fit these definitions.

  • @BananaTrifleViolin
    link
    English
    604 months ago

    Aggressive capitalism coupled with user ignorance is the main issue. The advice still remains don’t install all this shit, but people growing uo with smartphones have bought in to this idea that it’s reasonable for Google to spy on your every move, so why not every other app?

    So many users have no idea how their devices work - even an inkling - now what apps do, how to keep devices secure and private, and what happens with their data. Business has taken advantage of that - people want things to “just work” so business use that as a way to abuse users and make every app a trojan horse for data mining.

    Even Google, Apple etc privacy settings are bullshit - they’re just figleafs of psuedo privacy that enable them as the platform makers to dictate the terms.

    I switched away from Windows to Linux on PC, and I use FOSS alternatives on my Android device (even considering replacing android with FOSS system - difficult with some work essential apps unfortunately). But even if you stay on windows/android there are plenty of things users can do to protect themselves - they just don’t know how or worse can’t be bothered by the whole issue.

  • SteefLem
    link
    English
    534 months ago

    I think i read somewhere that the cia said they dont install bugs anymore because now ppl do that themselfs.

    • @Mostly_Gristle
      link
      English
      564 months ago

      Yeah, I’ve read a bunch of articles over the last few years about how a lot of law enforcement agencies are finding that instead of getting a warrant and doing a bunch of surveillance they can just buy people’s private data from a data broker and get more info than they would have been able, or allowed, to gather if they’d gotten the warrant.

    • @T156
      link
      English
      164 months ago

      It’s also a lot easier to do it in software, since you don’t need to splice wires and leave physical traces like you would have had to do in the day.

      A well-configured charger or Flash drive can do that job for you, and can spread itself.

        • @T156
          link
          English
          74 months ago

          Yes, since most modern chargers and cables have internal chips to communicate capabilities with for things like fast-charging. It is not difficult to have the chip identify itself as something else, and execute a payload.

          A common attack method is to have it show up as a keyboard, and execute a series of key-sequences when connected to a computer (like opening and executing things through a command prompt).

          It is also why you should try and avoid plugging random USB cables/chargers into your phone/computer when out and about, since you don’t exactly know if the other end is what it appears to be.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            I don’t know enough about the charger thing to comment on how viable that might be for an attack vector.

            But you’re definitely right about plugging your mobile device into random ports. Either set your phone to by default only charge and not communicate, use a charge-only cable, or only use your own power bank/charger when away from home and you don’t fully trust where you are…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      So I’m pretty averse to getting new apps and giving them location permissions.

      Just cause of this comment I went it and looked at the location permissions, holy shit so many apps had it that shouldn’t have. Like Apple home… wtf does it need location for, it uses wifi…

  • @sudo42
    link
    English
    51
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If there’s anyone here that cares about their privacy and doesn’t know this already:

    If you have a choice between accessing the website through a browser and installing an app, use the browser. Browsers (typically) at least try to protect the types of information that gets sent, whereas there are much fewer restrictions (again, typically) for apps.

    Everyone wants you to install apps because apps (typically) get access to much more data.

    • @ForgotAboutDre
      link
      English
      314 months ago

      The worst is many of these apps are just websites repackaged as apps. They just want the elevated access being an app gives them.

    • @Raykin
      link
      English
      274 months ago

      Whoa. I hope it was my fake Limp Bizkit song because a couple friends and I actually did this around 2000.

        • @Raykin
          link
          English
          304 months ago

          A shitty spoof we made about hot pockets. We listed it on Napster or Limewire as a bootleg.

          • @ohlaph
            link
            English
            64 months ago

            Thank you.

    • Ricky Rigatoni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      My fellow americans, I would once again like to say I did not have sexual relations with that woman.

  • @feedum_sneedson
    link
    English
    38
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Yeah, when I was setting up my first smartphone there was a very weird moment where I had to go against a lifetime of training on laptops and desktop PCs and just immediately invite every single app to fuck me up the arse if I wanted it to function as anything more than an expensive telephone with a fancy screen. But invite them up my arse I did.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    264 months ago

    Reminds me of that Futurama clip from over 20 years ago where Fry is on the internet and a literal mob of advertisements surround him.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    264 months ago

    It was considered best practice to never install anything

    In what universe? You might as well never turn on your computer.

    • @TrickDacy
      link
      English
      184 months ago

      Yeah this post makes a good point but sounds a little like the writer did not experience what they claim to. WeatherBug was buggy slow bullshit and everyone installed it anyway. it was only people who noticed details who saw how sluggish it made your PC. To this day I’ve never heard a single person talk about it getting your location being a problem, until now. That’s a good point I guess but I just don’t think it was on many people’s radars.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        I installed all kinds of stuff, but the metric was if it slowed down my PC or especially my games. That’d get me to uninstall, run antivirus and/or anti-malware, or even totally reinstall Windows real quick.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          English
          54 months ago

          Exactly! We weren’t yet used to companies spying on us and computers were on the slow side anyhow

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          Yeah, I would install anything that just used 0 resources when it’s not running. But that’s not what malware does

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      114 months ago

      It really feels like the OP didn’t have older people in their life with browsers with 3 or more toolbars that you had to service every other month. 😅

      People clicked yes to everything. Just like they do now. Nothing has changed.

      • @Aux
        link
        English
        34 months ago

        3? More like 33!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Before clicking yes just meant ruining your sandbox which was your computer. You can’t just have a bad PC today, instead you get your data leaked and become a target for scams.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      In this universe. I didnt want to have 10 fucking different toolbars for my browser. You had to see the correct download button, so that you get your wanted download plus malware/viruses. If you got the wrong you got a lot of malware xD

  • KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    254 months ago

    shit like this is why im going to eventually create my own little internet island.

    Dw, i’m going to rule over it like a dictator, no democracy here :)

    • Kairos
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 months ago

      Do it. It’s so nice.

      Use Wireguard to access it remotely.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 months ago

        I have a theory that this is the next iteration of Internet. A private internet linked by vpn over the public Internet. Probably already exists in some form over Tor or in dusty Pirate communities. All we need is a no-commercial-entities clause and a Yahoo clone and we could rock like it’s 1994!

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        oh i’ve already got that part setup. I’m talking about exposing it to the wider world so i can create my own little internet cult.

  • @simin
    link
    English
    44 months ago

    by this logic AAVs equivalent for ads will come into existence in a couple years… maybe its already here.