• @MrEff
    link
    787 months ago

    For those who don’t know: when milk is milked out of the cow it goes through some processing, like pasteurization and separation. When milk separates the fat floates to the top and it is “skimmed” off. You can have ‘whole’ fat in your milk, as in they only take off the very top part of cream on top. Then you can have your ‘skim’ milk with no fat. Then you can add back in a percentage of the fat. This is where the most common 1% and 2% come in. In theory you can make whatever percentage milk you want. This is also where something like half and half comes in, half cream added back to half milk for a 50% ish mix.

    • @mkwt
      link
      857 months ago

      For reference, “whole milk” is about 3.5%.

      • @jaybone
        link
        147 months ago

        You’d think whole would be more than half and half.

        • BubbleMonkey
          link
          fedilink
          117 months ago

          I believe the reason for this (at least what I’ve been told in a dairy-heavy area) is that nobody calls half and half “milk”. They literally ask for cream, creamer, or half and half when that’s what they are looking for, because it’s not consumed as a stand-alone beverage like milk, and has different properties. And it’s sort of always been this way because the cream floats and they’d skim it off, so the composition of the remaining fluid portion is probably not that different.

          So basically it’s not included for the naming scheme because it’s a wholly unrelated product despite having all the same ingredients in different ratios. It’s on the milk spectrum, just like heavy whipping cream, but isn’t what most people would classify as milk.

          • @I_Fart_Glitter
            link
            77 months ago

            because it’s not consumed as a stand-alone beverage like milk,

            Nope, I definitely do not have two half gallon cartons of half and half in my fridge right now that will be consumed by the glass… that would be… weird… or whatever…

            • BubbleMonkey
              link
              fedilink
              77 months ago

              Nothing wrong with that, if your diet allows for the higher fat content and it makes you happy. I’m certainly not going to judge when I have bought heavy whipping cream on multiple occasions for likely the same hedonistic, vaguely taboo, reason.

              However, despite having advanced tastes, we are well in the minority. Most people find the mouthfeel alone (by alone I mean without enhancing the flavor) to be… mildly unpleasant. And I sort of get that; we don’t have many super creamy drinks, and the ones we do have are wicked rich/sweet. Whipping cream doesn’t taste like much, in the traditional sense, it’s just more expensive and a higher calorie load, and gives you more phlegm, so most people aren’t going to want it outside of cooking where the lack makes a notable difference. Same with half and half; it’s an ingredient and not a food itself.

              If you get something out of the mouthfeel and richer flavor that makes it worth it for you, though, you do you. I totally get it. The richness combined with lactose, instead of sucrose or fructose which are harder on my gut bacteria, is deeply satisfying to me, and always has been.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        87 months ago

        Thank you! This is a question I’ve pondered my entire life but never actually took the time to look up.

    • Lemminary
      link
      247 months ago

      I want 98% fat with 2% milk.

    • @ikidd
      link
      English
      187 months ago

      I don’t understand skim milk; it’s just white water. If you want milk, drink milk. That stuff is just a cruel joke.

      • @cmbabul
        link
        147 months ago

        It’s water that’s lying about being milk

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        -107 months ago

        It’s not just white water, it’s white sugar water. They replace the fat with sugar, which is considerably worse for your health.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -17 months ago

      Sounds complicated. I get my milk straight from the producer. Don’t want any additives that mess up the taste.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        I don’t know if you’re serious, but if you are be careful with avian flu. Raw milk from a cow has a decent chance of being infected right now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      I mean… I guess anything can be a mystery if you don’t want to learn about it. So, yes!

      The top comment here in this thread was excellent at giving a quick overview, for those interested.

      • @ElectroVagrant
        link
        27 months ago

        I agree on both points!

        I like to try to add a little more levity around here, especially when it’s in the spirit of the original post!

  • @RizzRustbolt
    link
    67 months ago

    That’s why I leave cottage cheese out for racoons. 98% milkfat babe.

  • @southernbrewer
    link
    English
    17 months ago

    Is it really called 2% milk? That seems inverted tbh since it’s obviously 98% milk and 2% fat. Here (NZ) we call it something like “trim” or “skim” or “98% fat free”

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
    link
    English
    -11
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It’s milk that the company has extracted all the nutrients from, and replaced them with sugar. Now you get expensive sugar water, and they can sell the good stuff in other products such as whipped cream, heavy cream, and butter.

    Edit: apparently the higher sugar content in skim and nonfat milk is because the removal of fat concentrates the remaining lactose. They don’t add additional sugar. The original point still remains though, that it’s mostly just milk flavored sugar water.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      127 months ago

      The answer above that called the other 98% “mystery fun” was far more informative than this fabrication.

      Pasteurization is a very, very important process for keeping humans safe. Nobody should be framing it as “extracting the nutrients”. This is especially true right now in the US, since dairy cows in multiple states have tested positive for bird flu. Their milk has been confirmed to have the virus in it, but it’s dead virus thanks to Pasteurization.

      • @masquenox
        link
        37 months ago

        The fat content of milk has absolutely nothing to do with pasteurization, genius.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m not talking about pasteurization. Whole, skim, and nonfat milk can all be pasteurized. I’m talking about them taking all of the nutritious natural fats out of the milk and replacing it with sugar to make skim and nonfat milk.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        07 months ago

        Go compare the sugar content of whole milk to skim milk. You don’t need to take my word for it, it’s written right on the label.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          57 months ago

          I don’t disagree with your conclusion, but I don’t think they replace anything with sugar. Milk is just high in sugars, because it’s supposed to give energy and nutrients to a growing calf. If you remove the fats then the sugar content is higher as a percentage.

          Milk isn’t all that healthy in general though. It’s liquid for a calf to grow. It’s much better to drink something made for human consumption and dietary needs.

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
            link
            English
            77 months ago

            Ah, you are correct. I just checked. I always thought that they added extra sugar so that it doesn’t taste terrible. I know they do that with some other non-fat foods. The higher sugar content in skim and nonfat milk is because the removal of fat concentrates the remaining lactose, like you said. Thanks for correcting me!

            • sebinspace
              link
              37 months ago

              Good on you for being graceful about it.

    • Ignotum
      link
      217 months ago

      Even if you don’t care about the ethics, plant milk is getting cheap (oat milk is cheaper than cows milk where i live), tastes good, has a longer shelf life and has thus far worked perfectly as a replacement in baking and such

      • @LucidNightmare
        link
        77 months ago

        How do you get over the nutty aftertaste? Every milk derivative I have tried, always tasted really really bad compared to regular milk. Trust me, I want to go plant milk, but goodness the taste is awful for me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          67 months ago

          Which ones have you tried? Some soy milk has a pretty strong flavor, some doesn’t. Oat doesn’t have an aftertaste like that imo, or pea milk

          • @LucidNightmare
            link
            27 months ago

            Of course almond milk, and that was the first one I tried. I hated that one because I don’t like almonds, so I didn’t want to give up there. When I tried oat milk, I liked it a little at first, but it started to have a play-doh taste like a day or two after opening it, and I did not buy another to see if it was a bad batch.

            Can you recommend some oat milk that will taste good, and not break the bank so to speak? :)

            • @rishado
              link
              47 months ago

              Planet oat and chobani taste the best, if you can find it make sure to get the extra creamy/barista versions

              • @LucidNightmare
                link
                17 months ago

                I see my local mart sells the Chobani kind, so I will give that one a try. Thank you!

            • Cethin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              The first time I tried oat milk (during early covid and literally didn’t have any other choices left for milk or milk alternatives) I didn’t like it. Every time after that I’ve actually thought it was pretty good. By far it’s the best thing to put in coffee or tea, but I don’t drink those often anymore and typically I drink them black anyway. I can’t recommend brands, but I’d just say to experiment. Write down which you like. I’m sure some people like all of them, because they made it to market and I’m sure we’re tested for preference.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              37 months ago

              NextMilk! My partner is a picky eater but miraculously will consume NextMilk with cereal. It also works great for baking and cooking. We’ve stopped buying cow milk completely.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              27 months ago

              Tbh I’m a soy milk fan, oat isn’t really my thing either. But, I know lots of people love it which is why I recommend it. I like silk soy milk the most, I usually go for unsweetend vanilla but it doesn’t have the super strong soy flavor like other brands

      • @chonglibloodsport
        link
        57 months ago

        Is it 3x cheaper? Because cow’s milk contains 3x the protein of oat milk per cup (250ml). If you’re drinking milk as a source of protein then oat milk isn’t going to be a good substitute.

        Filtered milk is what I buy and it has a shelf life of about a month. That’s plenty for me since I go through a 4L bag in less than a week anyway.

        • Ignotum
          link
          97 months ago

          I… Have never heard of anyone drinking milk for the protein content, why would you do that?

          Milk has like 35g of protein per liter, so 4 liters is 140g of proteins a week… There are more cost effective and pleasant ways of getting that protein you know

          EDIT: i googled what “filtered milk” is, i can guarantee you that it is more than 3x as expensive as oat milk where i live since i’ve never heard of it and would probably have to go to a specialty store or something to get it

          • @chonglibloodsport
            link
            27 months ago

            Well where I live 4L of fine-filtered milk costs about the same as a single 946mL carton of oat milk.

            Perhaps you haven’t spent much time around body builders or weight lifters in general. They tend to consume large amounts of milk and/or whey protein as well as eggs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        47 months ago

        Or if you ethically prioritize “the environment” over the individual victims of the industry, plant milk has a way smaller footprint. Even the worst one (almond milk, iirc) is way better than milk from animals