• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    69
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This is such annoying chart. It implies that that these countries on top have more depressed people, but it correlates more accurately with how accessible the antidepressants are

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I don’t think it was designed to imply that. None of the language appears to steer the viewer to a specific conclusion, letting the viewer interpret it for themselves.

      That being said, I would agree that the data itself represents both access to mental health care and culture (specifically, if that culture has a stigma against it).

      I think some of the larger countries are not really useful in the dataset though. I’m curious how say, California and say, Alabama, would look in the dataset.

      • @calcopiritus
        link
        English
        224 months ago

        Considering that 100+ is red, most is orange, low is yellow, it looks like “look these are the bad countries with depressed people”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          Holy crap I’m blind xD. I take it back, it does seem to portray the notion. Goes to show how subtle it is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        Yeah I think it the best would be comparisons in smaller areas, such US states or within Europe, where availability is similar within the area but culture might have bigger impact.

        I have no idea how you could measure the people who’re in need of those medicine within area though, which would be the most interesting comparison. Are people in Finland more depressed than, say, Estonians?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        04 months ago

        I don’t think it was designed to imply that.

        Are you suggesting that “Antidepressant Consumption” just accomplishes the goal of implying people are more depressed accidentally, then? It’s very effective, even if it tries to hide behind language.

  • Jake Farm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    84 months ago

    I wonder if this overlaps with reported happiness in those countries.

  • @Spider2013
    link
    English
    8
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    More like a chart than a guide… still interesting, though

  • tmpod
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64 months ago

    Seeing Portugal in second depresses me, but it’s kinda expected :/

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      English
      54 months ago

      They invented a whole musical genre about it. So there’s that.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    English
    44 months ago

    Russians seem to be a very happy bunch.

      • Diplomjodler
        link
        English
        64 months ago

        No, that can’t possibly be it. How could anybody not be happy to live in the greatest country in the world?

        • @ladicius
          link
          English
          34 months ago

          Yep. Their life expectancy is impressive! Really an outstanding example how to treat the population well.

    • @telllos
      link
      English
      34 months ago

      I think they use vodka.

  • str82L
    link
    English
    34 months ago

    Why is there an entire continent, Africa, without any data? And Asia is only just represented. Is it because they are very low users, or they just weren’t considered in the data set? Or something else?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 months ago

    Hm, so roughly corresponding to middle class purchasing power with Norway (and Finland a bit) being the outliers?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    My takeaway: Be More Like Norway, with its higher susceptibility to seasonal affected disorder but low meds usage. It makes me think they’re doing something right.

  • meseek #2982
    link
    fedilink
    English
    04 months ago

    Useless without actually showing what data was used to make this. Also, what does “number of antidepressants” mean exactly? Is the amount someone consumes, or the different brands they take?