• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14511 days ago

    That headline is golden. But boy is it depressing that this is where we’re at as a nation. And it’s all because the GOP has been taken over by fascists and their army of useful idiots in tacky red hats.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7011 days ago

      What’s depressing is if literally any of our institutions acted how they were supposed to, this wouldn’t be an issue.

      The 4th estate is failing the country because they’ve been bought by oligarchs.

      The judicial apparatus is failing because it’s been bought by oligarchs.

      The political apparatus is failing because it’s been bought by oligarchs.

      Man I wish we could put our finger on the reason why everything is coming down around us…

      • @barsquid
        link
        3511 days ago

        It’s awesome how we can trace so much evil back to Southern Strategy and Reaganomics.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2111 days ago

          It’s very frustrating, yeah. All the progress this country was making was thwarted by a bunch of butt-hurt southerners and racists.

        • @Archelon
          link
          610 days ago

          Hell, you can take it further back to the failure of Reconstruction and the resulting propaganda wave creating a massive reactionary base.

    • @ZagamTheVile
      link
      6311 days ago

      Remember when Dean had to drop out because he showed excitement about doing well?

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        2011 days ago

        To be fair, his campaign was already on the rocks at that point. It wasn’t the scream alone that did him in.

          • @commandar
            link
            1211 days ago

            He came to suck years later.

            At the time he was considerably farther to the left than the rest of the field short of Dennis Kucinich. Opposition to the Iraq war was central to his campaign when half the party was still trying to justify it. He wanted to push universal healthcare before that was a common position within the party. He was on the cutting edge of promoting gay rights and was extremely popular in the gay community when that community didn’t have the voice it does now. His stint as DNC chair built real party infrastructure and helped set the stage for Obama’s 2008 run.

            The country – and the Democratic Party – were considerably more conservative 20 years ago and he definitely helped push things toward where we are now.

            That said, he’s absolutely said and done some things in recent year that make it pretty clear he’s not the progressive vanguard he was back then. He’s stood still, and arguably regressed, while the country kept moving. It’s unfortunate. But I think it’s also a mistake to dismiss him outright; he was a pretty important figure in getting the party to where it is now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      It’s golden and also inaccurate.

      Probation officers aren’t assigned until somebody has been sentenced. This is a pre-sentencing investigation to see if he is eligible for probation.

      If he’s not, he doesn’t meet with his probation officer until after he gets out of jail.

      • @NJSpradlin
        link
        16
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        https://www.excelsior.edu/article/what-is-the-difference-between-parole-officers-and-probation-officers/

        Probation: you don’t go to jail, a probation officer is assigned during the sentencing phase

        Parole: you just got let out of jail early and a parole officer is assigned to you

        Similarities: you still get a government baby sitter and your rights stripped from you,

        Differences: when they’re assigned and when you get them.

        Edit: for those that came after his edit, he initially stated ‘parole’ officer.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Actually I edited the italics for clarity.

          Either way, this is an investigation with a probation officer.

          He’s not on probation yet, and may not be eligible and have to do straight time.

          That’s what I was trying to clarify that the headline implied. That he’d already been sentenced, when he hasn’t.

      • @NJSpradlin
        link
        311 days ago

        Did you read the article, though?

      • @troglodytis
        link
        211 days ago

        So… Trump met with a probation officer that is assigned to his case currently. Right? So… His probation officer.

        Super curious. What about this hair makes you think you needed to split it(and edit your error without acknowledging its correction)?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          The article title implies that he’s already been sentenced and is on probation. That’s what that string of words means. The probation officer he met with is doing a presentence investigation. They aren’t assigned to him.

          I.e. not his probation officer because he’s not on probation because this is still pre-sentencing.

          I edited italics for clarity. Don’t be an ass.

          Edit I also edited this post for clarity. Twice!

          • @troglodytis
            link
            1
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Well just under the headline the article states “pre-sentencing”

            So you didn’t take the time to understand the article, didn’t take the opportunity to realize your lack of understanding of the various roles and duties of a New York probation officer, and still haven’t, even though multiple inaccuracies in your statements have been pointed out to you.

            Obtuse throughout.

            Edit: engaging has been my mistake. I thought your original comment was in regards to the headline. This makes clear you are speaking to the article. Had I understood that, I would have not replied, as there would be little point.

  • @RapidcreekOP
    link
    7011 days ago

    Gotta admit, posted for the headline.

    • mad_asshatter
      link
      1911 days ago

      Shame on you!! Shame on you!! Shame on you!!

      You beat me to it!

  • @hperrin
    link
    3911 days ago

    All those chants of “lock her up” for almost a decade, without even one shred of tact or civility, were all building up to this glorious headline.

  • @RapidcreekOP
    link
    2311 days ago

    "It was a big, beautiful meeting… everyone is saying how great I handled it.

    Men – big, strong, patriotic men with tears in their eyes, straight out of Central Casting – came running up to me saying “Sir, we’ve been to millions of probation meetings, but we’ve never been to one handled so amazingly as you did”.

  • @HWK_290
    link
    English
    1911 days ago

    “I’m living the American nightmare!”

    Alas, where I and the Trump campaign agree… Just not on the details

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1611 days ago

    Trump appears to be fundraising off of his hush-money pre-sentencing interview on Monday

    Republicans are stupid. Unfortunately, they’re not quite too stupid to live. They might drag us all down with them, though.

  • @Whirling_Cloudburst
    link
    1111 days ago

    Republicans probably: Its not gay to be sodomized if we do it to own the Libs.

  • @Snapz
    link
    211 days ago

    Convicted felon AND presumptive…