• acargitz
    link
    fedilink
    49
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Maybe at some point the Americans will get scared that the Chinese are actually making strides ahead of them in electrification and decarbonization to actually get unstuck from their idiotic culture war over fossil fuels.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      315 months ago

      America will stop trying to sell oil when it runs out of oil and not one second before, no matter the actual cost.

    • @librejoe
      link
      135 months ago

      Eh take news from China with a Giga size grain of salt.

      • acargitz
        link
        fedilink
        205 months ago

        I don’t know about this particular piece of news, but the insane expansion of HSR for example is no fake news.

      • Bilb!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        155 months ago

        As opposed to news from the united states, which is certified good and true and democratic

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Are you old enough to remember how every single mainstream journalist promoted the Iraq war? (no, “maybe the war could be executed more competently” is still supporting the war) How about Libya?

            Isn’t it funny how the mainstream media just happens to align with the state department every on every single issue?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              35 months ago

              Old enough to remember there were lots opposing it as well. Just.like the current Gaza war. Just like they have criticised immigration policies, or approved them. Same with coal, same with the EPA neutering, same with the oil spills in the gulf. Same with the lack of proper aid and support when the lowlands flooded.

              Just because you ignore it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

              I’d be happy to adjust my opinion, should you provide similar journalism from china, about china.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                9
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Old enough to remember there were lots opposing it as well. Just.like the current Gaza war.

                Except none of them meaningfully oppose the gaza war. The closest thing to criticism you’ll hear from a mainstream source is how Netanyahu personally isn’t carrying out the war out humanely enough. Note that this is not actually opposition to the war, since it just calls for a return to the state of slow ethnic cleansing that spawned the war. They oppose the way and rate the settler colonialist ethnostate carries out ethnic cleansing, not the settler colonialist ethnostate whose national project requires ethnic cleansing.

                Just as in the Iraq war, nobody was saying “This is bad, and we should leave now, there’s a million people protesting it outside” until like 2006, when the plans to leave were already drawn up (a schedule Obama maintained).

                There was a million “The war is good, but it’s being done poorly” and later on “The war is bad, but we’re here and have to carry it out more competently”, but the idea of not pursuing the war was so toxic, republicans would accuse democrats of wanting to “cut and run” (in the same way they accuse democrats of being insufficiently supportive of Israel, despite literally going around congress to keep the weapons flowing).

          • carl_marks[use name]
            link
            fedilink
            45 months ago

            “The more your media landscape criticizes it’s own government the less critically you can consume it”

            Lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        The space race is on. That’s why Starship has been launching so much. Someone at the FAA must have finally realized that if SpaceX doesn’t go ahead at full SpaceX speed, we’re gonna see China take over space.

        They’ve got a space station and a rover on the moon. China will easily overtake us in space, has already in a few places.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -15 months ago

      Fossil fuels aren’t just a culture war. Energy is really important for people, including poor people.

      • acargitz
        link
        fedilink
        125 months ago

        Poor people also care about not dying from the effects of climate change.

        Poor people don’t care about the megaprofits of the oil, gas, and automotive industries.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    275 months ago

    To the best of my knowledge, this is the first commercially-funded (i.e., non-government) nuclear fusion reactor. Notable investors are MiHoYo (developers of Genshin Impact), Nio (Chinese EV company), and Sequoia Capital…

    • @kippinitreal
      link
      145 months ago

      In your guys opinion, is that good or bad? Privately funded would mean proprietary & profit driven implementation for such a crucial technology (if successful). I personally don’t like it.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        245 months ago

        The CPC still maintains a lot of influence over companies even when they’re getting their funding from private industry as part of their “politics in command” strategy for controlling market forces. We’ll see how it plays out.

        • @ours
          link
          45 months ago

          Yep, if they need to disappear a CEO, no matter how big, they can and have done so in the past.

          • Match!!
            link
            fedilink
            English
            175 months ago

            i don’t know why you got a downvote, disappearinga CEO should be the most popular thing the ccp does

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        Any path that takes us to unlimited clean energy is the right one IMO. We could always do a little espionage and make our own domestic fusion drive eventually.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -45 months ago

        I don’t mind profit driven because I’m confident that free markets are good for everybody.

    • @RubberElectrons
      link
      85 months ago

      No??

      I’ve supported engineering at several privately funded nuclear fusion companies, though all of them, this Chinese company included, are building a product out of public school research.

      Off the top of my head there’s:

      • CFS
      • TAE technologies
      • Thea
      • Zap Energy

      And several more…

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        05 months ago

        Building, or built? Either way, maybe these companies will come out with a better design than Tokamak, but until then they’re literally just research ventures because the vast majority of investment at actually scaling fusion is happening for Tokamak tractors.

        • @RubberElectrons
          link
          2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Built, physically operational reactors that operate as close to Q=1 as they can, with all the diagnostics included.

          The diagnostics are very important, as plasma instabilities have been, and continue to be, the critical issue preventing anything useful coming out of our decades of fusion reactor design. All these companies are sharing data on overcoming plasma instability issues, with multiple geometries aimed at evaluating how plasma responds to different inputs in different environments. We’re all trying to understand how to control and compress something far too hot to physically touch.

          @[email protected] scaling fusion isn’t a trivial problem, and saying it like it is indicates a lack of background knowledge. This isn’t a competition between companies (no matter what our CEOs suggest), as we in industry quietly all agree that any of us that cracks this unchains humanity from the solar system. Because government funding has unfortunately sucked so much ass, we’re sort of using private money to get the basic research done. We’d be so much farther ahead otherwise.

  • @kerrigan778
    link
    215 months ago

    This is an article from a CCP operated tabloid… Seriously?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    95 months ago

    In the image of the discharge you can clearly see that the device has no cladding. That means a discharge would be limited to a duration of a few seconds, otherwise the material ablated from the wall would lead to extreme heat losses of the plasma. Did they include a future vessel cladding to the plasma volume calculation in the article?

    • @RubberElectrons
      link
      25 months ago

      Good points and questions. First wall interaction is going to be an interesting problem for this team to work around.

    • @rishado
      link
      -45 months ago

      Natural gas bad, but ccp good?