• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10012 days ago

    So we need the ECB to start QE in a big way to buy back government bonds. However the Saudis do not own too many.

    We also have to go electric on transportation and that much much faster. Only a third of the EUs oil comes from the US and Norway. The rest comes from mainly dictatorships. Going green means supporting democracy. Staying on fossil fuels means supporting dictatorships.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Yep, even if you didn’t care about the environmental aspect (which you should), not having to rely on dictatorships all over the place for your energy needs should be enough reason to transition away from fossil fuels.

    • Meldrik
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 days ago

      I’m in agreement, but who produces the batteries? China…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1111 days ago

        There are a lot of battery factories being built in the EU right now. Even if they come from China, it is a one time purchase and not a total dependence.

        • Meldrik
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 days ago

          True, but right now, a lot of the resources come from China. Solar is also something that is mainly from China. EU dropped that ball pretty fast.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            This might change in the near future some time ago(not to sure how long exactly) I read an Article about a massive ore field of the resources needed for electrical components being discovered in Denmark Sweden.

            • federal reverseM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              310 days ago

              Iirc: For certain materials like Lithium as well as Rare Earths, China basically has a monopoly on processing currently. E.g. with Lithium, Australia and Chile are major sources of the raw materials but virtually all of it is processed in China. Even if the raw materials come from the EU, there may be a major piece of the supply chain missing.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 days ago

                Okay, that’s fair. I’m not entirely sure but I know that Intel is building a processing plant in Germany. I don’t know if they use raw materials, or they also rely on other manufacturers to produce stuff for them.

                • federal reverseM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  110 days ago

                  Chip plants are another matter yet again. They usually work with silicon wafers into which they a chip surface.

                  I don’t know where Intel get their materials from either. The silicon processing industry is largely Chinese again—I think Western and Japanese countries do have the appropriate factories and technology too though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      012 days ago

      Glad my money isn’t wrapped up in EUR. QE = inflation.

      I’m all for going green, it’s worth mentioning that having trade with dictatorships is a two-way street, we can also use that trade as leverage to hold them slightly accountable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        612 days ago

        In this case it gives the Saudis central bank money, which then leads to more money being removed over the coming years. Since the Saudis want to dump it, they have to sell it below market value. Due to that at intresst this means the ECB is moving money out of the monetary system. Hence this is deflationary. We actually saw that in the real world as well. QE meant low intresst rates. The intresst rates shot up as soon as QE was stopped.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 days ago

      Desperate. They’re licking each other’s boots because the resource wars are beginning and they’re not in the greatest standing

  • Optional
    link
    English
    2211 days ago

    Hey two of trump’s bestest buddies!

  • atro_city
    link
    fedilink
    1512 days ago

    What does this even mean? I’d like to be able to make a huge debt and then sell it for a profit too. Teach me how 🥺

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1211 days ago

      Well first this doesn’t really have anything to do with the article.

      But to answer your question:

      Be in a situation where your central bank (they can’t get bankrupt as they literally print money) doesn’t give interest (negative interest even better)

      Be big, financially competent and trustworthy enough that no one doubts that you can pay back any loan.

      Now people that have too much money and need a convenient place to store that money without too much costs buy your debt for more than what it’s worth.

      Profit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 days ago

      Sorry I somehow forgot the first part of your question. If I understand correctly they threaten to sell off the debt they hold which will increase the supply of that debt, while at the same time decrease the amount of potential buyers.

      To still be able to sell their debt the EU countries now have to (as any country needs a constant influx of money) make the new debt more attractive by offering better interest etc

  • Maple Engineer
    link
    English
    1210 days ago

    Is that the same Saudi Arabia that did 9/11?

  • Transporter Room 3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1111 days ago

    It sure is great to see all these pinnacles of democracy that work for the betterment of all mankind who are the ones supporting Russia.

    All those anti-fascist leaders of progressive countries, with progressive governments, who are clearly urging Russia to cease hostilities…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1012 days ago

    At what point will a naked war for resources with Saudi Arabia make sense? Like if a leader went to the EU/America/Japan/Korea and said, “we’re gonna take the Saud’s oil and sell it for $25/barrel to everyone that helps us for 25 years.” And then we went to the public and said, “25 years to get off oil for good” when does that ship?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -111 days ago

        The issue with the Gulf Wars is that we wanted to control the oil resources via local proxy. Honestly, we (the US, I realize this is on the Europe@) could use our Navy to directly control about half of Saudi Arabia’s oil and buy ourselves time to get off oil.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 days ago

          Lol welcome to Afghanistan. It’s not armies marching in a straight line that will be the problem.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -111 days ago

            The Saudis don’t have a Navy. About half their reserves and a massive chunk of Iran, Kuwait and the other Gulf State’s reserves are in the Gulf. We don’t have to set foot on the Peninsula.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              310 days ago

              Neither does Ukraine. Still decimated the russian navy.

              Also to nip this whole “argument” in the bud, and I’m not even going into how terribly colonialistic your proposal is, how many billions of euro would you propose to put into essentially propping up a already dead technology. Fossil fuels have to be eliminated by 2050. Why wage war for something we won’t even need in 25 years.

              We WANT to increase fossil fuel prices. To hasten the change to renewables, the higher the potential savings the better.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 days ago

                Fossil fuels have to be eliminated by 2050. Why wage war for something we won’t even need in 25 years.

                I don’t think that fossil fuel usage will be eliminated in 25 years given the opposition to mass nuclear deployment. I think this would ideally be a carrot that dictates green energy buildouts in exchange for subsidized oil.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  13 days ago

                  My dude, but essentially that’s whats already happening. No energy is cheaper than renewable energy. Every process we thus electrify and use renewables is not using fossile fuels.

                  Thus we have less of a need for subsidized oil.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 days ago

      The issue is that currently, the cost of extracting oil exceeds $25/barrel. Personally, I would be glad to see the Saud family ousted from Arabia, as there are countless reasons to consign those disgusting Salafists to the dustbin of history. However, reducing the price of oil at this moment is not feasible.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 days ago

        This analysis is from 2019 and it doesn’t break down the cost difference for onshore vs. offshore oil. But it estimates the cost for the Saudi’s at $8.98/barrel (approximately $11.01 in todays dollars).

        Do you have the analysis where it says $25+/barrel. It is certainly possible that production costs have risen significantly in the last half decade.

    • OBJECTION!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 days ago

      Turns out people really don’t like being ruled over by nakedly colonialist regimes, and when people really don’t like things they tend to blow stuff up, and when people blow stuff up, it hurts the bottom line of oil companies, i.e. the only thing you care about for some reason.

      Do you want to create a second Iran? Because that’s what happened there.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        07 days ago

        That’s why we don’t take all the oil, just the offshore oil. It’s significantly more difficult to conduct terrorism when you have to swim to it.

        • OBJECTION!
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 days ago

          Ah yes, the sea, a place famous for how difficult it is to get away with crimes. I see no flaws in your plan. The seas around the Arabian Peninsula specifically haven’t had any notable activity from anti-Western rebel groups in 2024.

          Here’s a completely unrelated graph: