Will it be able to compete at all costs wise, given its lack of reusability?

BBC mentioned it would probably be a decade before the ESA reaches that sort of technology.

Sorry for dumb question I haven’t been following space stuff at all. But I read a couple articles on yesterdays launch and was interested.

  • Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    211 month ago

    Having the strategic capabilities to access space without having to rely on a far-right billionaire who is a big supporter of the person commiting genocide in Ukraine right now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    181 month ago

    Niche of political points.

    It is mainly “we can do it too” project now. There are lots of subcontractors, jobs and research put in to it but it won’t be price competitive any time soon. It is similar to SLS programe.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    111 month ago

    I don’t think it will have any market outside of European government contracts.

    • Troy
      link
      fedilink
      101 month ago

      I suspect, for very large constellation projects or similar, which would be adversely affected by a launch provider abruptly stopping launches for any reason, they might want to buy a few launches for redundancy purposes – just risk mitigation.

      I mean operators that aren’t Starlink, in this case.

  • @HootinNHollerin
    link
    71 month ago

    One day Musk will completely lose his mind beyond his current level of having lost his mind

    • threelonmusketeers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      While I agree with you that this is possible, I don’t think Ariane 6 is in any position to replace Falcon 9.

  • Kokesh
    link
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I think the only niche will be stubborn European governments.

    • @mecfsOP
      link
      101 month ago

      I mean in any case it’s good to have a backup to not have to rely on someone as uhh… unfavourable and unpredictable as Musk, but that’s disappointing to hear.

      • @mercano
        link
        101 month ago

        Yeah, unfortunately, SpaceX is streets ahead of anyone else in the launch industry in terms of reusability and, in turn, price. In a purely capitalistic system, they’d be putting everyone else out of business, but the US government wants a second source vendor, so ULA stays around, and foreign governments want independent access to space, for a combination of national security and pride, so the Russian, Chinese, Indian, and European space agencies keep on trucking.

        • Pennomi
          link
          English
          31 month ago

          I suspect in 10 years or so that’ll change. There are lots of new space companies, it just takes a long time to build a new rocket.