• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What, you’ve never seen that famous city with two Huawei and one Ericsson buildings, a six-floor Eiffel tower, a dozen random pylons per block, blue neon streets and a castle?

    • @pyre
      link
      English
      32 months ago

      “illustration” call it what it is: it’s slop

  • @tmjaea
    link
    English
    122 months ago

    Where Nokia?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 months ago

    Ekholm attributes Ericsson’s significant network market downturn on Chinese businesses.

    So long as Chinese rivals keep selling low-priced goods, telecoms won’t be able to put much pressure on them.

    Ain’t that called free market competition and all?

      • @mal3oon
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s more about China heavily subsidizing its tech industry, mainly to disrupt western innovations. Same thing is happening with Electrical Vehicles. Typical capitalist bait and switch.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          That’s true, but it’s also true that China has prioritised to make automated factories and investing heavily in just plain better battery tech.

          I know alot of the money came from the CCP, but when the investments are done, this new tech will outperform other companies on just being better (thinking of EV specifically).

          I think I’m just saying that a state investing in tech and technologies is not a bad idea always.

  • @Squizzy
    link
    English
    22 months ago

    Huawei is at every node of next generation networks. From customer equipment to splices, to testing equipment to the complete housing in exchanges.

    I havent seen anu erricson equipment being installed outside regulatory compliance replacements of older POTS gear.