The Trump campaign on Tuesday filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission arguing money raised for President Joe Biden’s reelection bid cannot be transferred to Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign.

The complaint was filed by the Trump campaign’s general counsel David Warrington and argues transferring the funds would amount to “little more than a thinly veiled $91.5 million excessive contribution from one presidential candidate to another.”

“Kamala Harris is seeking to perpetrate a $91.5 million dollar heist of Joe Biden’s leftover campaign cash — a brazen money grab that would constitute the single largest excessive contribution and biggest violation in the history of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended,” the complaint, a copy of which was obtained by CNN, states.

  • @9tr6gyp3
    link
    1014 months ago

    Lets see if we can find a way to delay the complaint until after the election.

    • @aseriesoftubes
      link
      464 months ago

      There’s no need to force a delay; the FEC moves at a snail’s pace. They’re still working on cases from the 2016 election.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The chairman trump stooge, Sean Cooksey said on Fox yesterday that Harris getting Bidens war chest is “fraudulent.”

        Trump filled the complaint today. He basically signaled to Trump right on Fox, that trump could make the complaint and he will back him

        I guarantee he will drop everything to “rule” on this.

        Ellen Weintraub who is a democratic FEC commissioner said that what Harris is doing isn’t illegal but it doesn’t matter since the chairman who is above her is a fucking toadie to Trump since he gave him the job.

        There are 3 Democrats and 3 Republicans (all nominated by Trump) so it’s likely the vote will be gridlocked and therefore Harris not being able to get the money since the decision will be “on hold.”

        What’s funny is that Cooksey’s term expired in 2021 but he gets to keep serving until a replacement is appointed by the Senate. If MAGA gets the Senate, they will get 2 MAGA replacements for the expired Democrats making any vote 4 -2.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          104 months ago

          A gridlocked decision means nothing happens. That’s why nothing happens for all the legitimate stuff before the FEC.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            04 months ago

            The FEC chair could spin it and say that because a decision has not been made of is allowed or not, access to the money will be frozen

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              34 months ago

              Based on what? The chair isn’t a tiebreaking vote, they don’t just get to make policy choices on an even split. The FEC needs 4 votes to act. There’s no spin involved, if they don’t have 4 votes, they can’t make an action. The chair doesn’t get to define the default result.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Well that is a relief. Although that relies on the chairman not pulling the “bullshit” card for Trump and saying the rules are different for this. MAGA does not respect precedent or the law.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  34 months ago

                  They just don’t have that power. That’s not what a chairperson is. They can say whatever they want, it doesn’t make it real. You don’t have to rely on Republicans to not spontaneously manifest new authority. They aren’t magic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          Trump filled the compliment today

          trump could make the compliment and he will back him

          I’m guessing “compliment” was supposed to be “complaint”?

      • @SlippiHUD
        link
        English
        34 months ago

        Working is a strong word. It’s more regulatory capture and violators release.

  • @snekerpimp
    link
    674 months ago

    “If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”

    • teft
      link
      404 months ago

      If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts; if you have the law on your side, pound the law; if you have neither the facts nor the law, pound the table.

      That’s the adage as i remember it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    444 months ago

    I heard that he can’t remember that he’s not running against Biden anymore. Many people are saying it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      114 months ago

      Didn’t he just get in trouble for using a large sum to pay a porn star to be quiet he slept with while his pregnant wife was at home?

      • @EmpathicVagrant
        link
        34 months ago

        It wasn’t about the payout, it was about keeping her quiet in order to influence the election that the trial focused on.

  • @Etterra
    link
    324 months ago

    This was pretty expected and will go nowhere useful for them. They’re literally just wasting time and money. Not only is there not a leg to stand on legally speaking, even if some Trump-sucking judge agreed to this, then the money could just be dumped into a Super PAC, and we all know how good they are at staying “independent.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      You would get a swell of people donating to Harris in protest if the original funds were blocked by a Trump judge.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They’re literally just wasting time and money.

      They’re also muddying the waters.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 months ago

      This is what I’ve thought of a lot of Trumps legal strategies in recent months, but here we are - the guy is never gonna face consequences.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    274 months ago

    I hope to fuck they counter sue and tack on lawyers fees and damages… this is such frivolous bullshit.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    264 months ago

    Cool. Transfer it all to a PAC. Then the PAC can give to Harris. All legal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      154 months ago

      IANAL, but I don’t think the PAC can give money to the candidates/campaign. However, they can (independently, and without coordinating) work on the candidates’ behalf.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Controls on coordination are a complete joke, though. I’m pretty sure she could literally publicly release a script with directors notes and say “I want this PAC to make this commercial and air it in these markets and timeslots” and it would be legal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          Pretty much, yeah. The big thing is that they wouldn’t have access to the candidates’ strategy. But most of that is pretty public. We already know a few of Harris’ talking points. We also know some of the things they will steer away from. What we don’t know is if there are any planned pivots later on, like an October Surprise

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    244 months ago

    Old Sleepy Don. It’s what you do when your own weak campaign can’t raise cash like the Dems.

  • @meeeeetch
    link
    214 months ago

    Oh no! She might be denied a day and a half’s fundraising.

    • @recapitated
      link
      54 months ago

      The way I understood it is that the Biden campaign was basically renamed and Harris is the candidate, so the war chest is deeper than since she announced.

  • @Ltcpanic
    link
    194 months ago

    Proud to be the only one providing actual analysis of legality in these comments so far 🫡

    “I don’t think most campaign finance lawyers believe that this is a best reading of the law,” Rick Hasen, an election law expert at UCLA’s law school, told CNN on Tuesday of the Trump campaign’s argument. But, he added, “that doesn’t mean it can’t get tied up in FEC proceedings for years.”

    Veteran Republican election lawyer Charlie Spies, who briefly served as the RNC’s general counsel earlier this year, argued recently that the Biden-Harris team must be formally nominated by their party before any money could be shifted.

    “If President Biden is committed to passing the torch to his vice president, and wants to be able to seed her campaign with the current Biden for President campaign war chest, he’ll first have to become his party’s legal nominee,” Spies wrote in an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal before Biden’s exit from the race.

    But other campaign finance experts disagree. And Federal Election Commissioner Dara Lindenbaum, a Democrat viewed as a swing vote on the evenly divided commission, has said Harris could access what Biden raised through the campaign committee because it is registered for both the president and vice president.

  • @800XL
    link
    174 months ago

    Trump is still wearing the ear diaper I see. Man up, you got a small scratch.

      • @gac11
        link
        44 months ago

        I think it’s because of how tiny the wound is. He doesn’t want to let on how minor his injury is

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m going to reach way back in my meme collection:

    Cry moar!

    Edit: for my next trick, I need “Get in loser, we’re going losing” with face swaps to Trump, Vance, and idk Boebert or something.

  • @Madison420
    link
    124 months ago

    Oh no citizens United bite me!

      • @Madison420
        link
        14 months ago

        Oh I guarantee they’re going to wrap it in because of they’re successful it gains more power and standing for a bullshit ruling.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Has 0 to do with CU as its not more donations but the transfer of already made donations to the biden campaign to Harris and since Harris was already Biden’s running mate well it’s technically the same campaign so… Trump is just trying the shotgun method, put a lawsuit against anything you don’t like…

          • @Madison420
            link
            14 months ago

            It’s held by a business entity, they’re going to try. I never said they would succeed, the shear amount of abjectly stupid legal arguments republicans have made in the last 6 years is astounding.