• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    40
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The biggest advantage of bows in a gun setting would be stealth, can’t shoot what you don’t know is there. Makes the superhero stuff a bit difficult, though.

    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      434 months ago

      But what if you put a boxing glove on your arrow? Surely that would help

      • @masquenox
        link
        54 months ago

        Not stab-resitant armour, though. They can easily swap one out with the other.

        • @RizzRustbolt
          link
          44 months ago

          Or put on a jean jacket over the kevlar.

    • @CheeseNoodle
      link
      English
      74 months ago

      I’d still go with a repeating crossbow though, more power while being easier and faster to use.

      • @isles
        link
        English
        154 months ago

        According to un-sourced Archery Heaven, regular crossbows are as loud as a lawnmower, nevermind repeating. Not quite the stealth you might be looking for.

        • ✺roguetrick✺
          link
          94 months ago

          Bowstring twang is going to be loud no matter what at high draw weights. A high draw weight recuve would be loud too.

          • @isles
            link
            English
            134 months ago

            Yep, that’s what the linked articles’ conclusion was. But 80dB vs 120dB is a huge difference, jackhammer compared to a dishwasher. Anyway, I’m out of my depth, I shot a bow last 30 years ago. And never as a stealthy assassin nor archery-based superhero.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              34 months ago

              TIL the movies lied to me! I vividly remember John Rambo stealth-killing a camp of enemy fighters with a bow.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        “easier to use” shouldn’t really matter for Particularly-Good-At-Archery-Man. It’s not like a bow is a particularly slow weapon, either (medieval archers were probably doing about 10 shots per minute), and you don’t really need the additional power of crossbows - medieval war bows were able to kill armored knights, they were pretty much only limited by the archer’s strength. Whether you need high power pretty much depends on the setting - if you’re mostly fighting against human thugs who maybe wear a protective vest you don’t need extremely high draw strength. If the setting is more fantastical, why WOULDN’T “particularly good at archery” include absurdly strong muscles that make the additional power of crossbows unnecessary?

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          Medieval archers weren’t really aiming as much as just lobbing the arrows in a general direction.

  • @SlopppyEngineer
    link
    384 months ago

    So many heroes only attach blue-collar crime, and never tackle white-collar crime. It’s classicist.

    • @masquenox
      link
      134 months ago

      So many heroes only attach blue-collar crime, and never tackle white-collar crime.

      Sooo… no different than the police, then.

    • @wjrii
      link
      English
      10
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s classicist.

      Crimen Omnia Ex Se Nata Vitiate.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
    link
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m sure there are plenty of other enemies he cannot defeat, like Just Bought a Pistol woman, or In Melee Range with a Dagger Man.