• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    60
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Reminder that every dollar possessed by the ultrawealthy is time you wouldn’t have had to spend working and could have instead used that time to enrich your personal life whether it’s alone, with family, or friends.

  • Lemminary
    link
    346 months ago

    The minimum wage should grow with inflation according to an annual review. It’s an injustice that there must be this huge battle every time it needs to be increased every few years but only when people get fed up because they can’t afford to live.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      166 months ago

      I don’t need no stinkin’ government getting involved in my business trying to… Get me more money. Same as when that Obama tried to save me money on healthcare. Don’t tread on me!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      96 months ago

      The minimum wage should grow with inflation according to an annual review.

      Pretty much how it’s handled in Australia, although they sometimes increase it above inflation. Importantly, it’s handled by an independent body and not something that is subject to votes in parliament.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      So if industrialists could manage inflation while increasing productivity, they should keep all the gains?

      • Lemminary
        link
        16 months ago

        We’d have a different system in an ideal world but I’m not commenting on that now.

        • Jerkface (any/all)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          I’m not sure you get the point I am making. You changed something, perhaps without noticing. The quote is about productivity, not inflation. Merely keeping pace with inflation when productivity is booming hardly seems enough.

          • Lemminary
            link
            16 months ago

            If you think productivity should be factored in that’s fine, but I’m not talking about productivity like the post is. I purposely left it out. I’m merely saying that wages should keep up with inflation at the very least.

  • @julysfire
    link
    226 months ago

    “BuT tHeN i WoUlD bE mAkInG lEsS cOmPaRaTiVeLy”

    Yes, that’s the point, everyone should be making more.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      Not necessarily.

      Increases in productivity could have been split between labor and capital, giving benefits to both. (Or even better, gone just to labor, but that would not be a “both lines go up” scenario.)

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yes. I was referring to how capitalism tended to have worked in the past decade or so, and not to how to actually make the line go up.

        E: autocorrect

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    116 months ago

    Should be much higher.

    A combination of inflation, gap between workers and leaders at the company AND productivity.

    50$/hr and 3 day weeks. There’s no reason to grind to make the ruling class more wealthy.

  • @AdamEatsAss
    link
    106 months ago

    According to my father in law it’s the participation trophies that are to blame.

  • @Psythik
    link
    96 months ago

    Could I please get a source for this? I want to post it in the break room at work.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    86 months ago

    Even just accounting for inflation, the $1.25/h federal minimum wage in 1963 would be about $13/h today.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    86 months ago

    Holy fuck the Gravel Institute is a nostalgia trip. Can’t believe those kids still have a job.

    • @rodneylives
      link
      15 months ago

      They’re back? Oh please oh please oh please…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    66 months ago

    The federal minimum wage was $1 per hour in 1960, so productivity has increased 23 fold according to the OP.

    Shouldn’t this mean we should be able to cut down to two hours of work per week?

    Having to work 40+ hours when 2 should be enough does sound like exploitation.

    • @workerONE
      link
      46 months ago

      I should only have to get out of bed once for every 23 mornings that I wake up, am I right?

  • @danc4498
    link
    English
    66 months ago

    Is this super outdated?

  • @Noodle07
    link
    56 months ago

    Can’t exploit me if I’m unemployed, checkmate capitalists

  • @Nuke_the_whales
    link
    46 months ago

    I’m pretty sure rents have gone up at more than double that number. Giving our shrinking wage even less worth.

  • Rolivers
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Really? Not more?

    Edit. Oh I see, back then minimum wage was about $1.15. Lol. Yeah a 23x increase seems reasonable.

    • @RedditRefugee69
      link
      1
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Probably regionally dependent. $23 in the Midwest but $50 in the big cities