Same with AOC, tbh.
Didn’t one of the Jan6ers steal her shoes?
my left wing conspiracy theory is that Ben Shapiro was the mastermind behind J6, which was actually an elaborate heist to steal AOC’s shoes and/or get her feet pics. 🕵️
I would absolutely watch a Oceans 11 movie but it’s GOP doing a grand heist of stealing AOC’s shoes.
Instead their weird ass movies involve God and fighting wokeness. 😭
I think I watched a different Ocean’s Eleven. They just robbed casinos.
exactly! the boring one!
AOCs attractiveness goes beyond politics.
Yeah she went to Boston University and got two degrees so she’s wicked smaht, too
I do like them apples
Momma always say: Find you a woman with a two-kilometer asteroid, sassa key?
AOC is beltalowda confirmed
They did even if they didn’t. Foot fuckers
Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée?
if you’re not stealing AOC’s shoes, it’s just a sparkling foot fetish, or something.
“I hate you Kamala Harris! I hate your smooth, caramel skin. I hate your luscious lips. I hate your big doe-like eyes. I hate that we’re not kissing right this very moment.”
Go on.
deleted by creator
George Orwell had word for that.
They’re quantum dumbasses
Doublethink.
Nah, their brains are parallelized and treat each argument as a seperate process. Since information is stored as private for each in process, they can’t access certain talking points for certain arguments. If you bring up information that the current argument isn’t privileged to access, they have to switch to an argument that does have access, at which point they can’t access the previous argument’s information.
If they didn’t have this design, rogue processes might be able to cause sensitive information to be accessed by unprivileged users (normie users don’t have the privilege to see data of white power users), or worse, you could get a pointer loop in their memory addresses which could lead to a system lock-up. /j
I think it’s not that they hold more positions, its that they have no room for complexity or nuance, it would unravel them, but they have unlimited capacity for avoiding self criticism
Well given how loudly anti-gay the Republicans who turn out to be very gay tend to be, I’d say both.
Reaction formation. It’s a hell of a time.
This applies to almost every target of the MAGAts.
-
AOC
-
Mexicans
-
Transfolk
-
Muslims
-
Gays
Methinks the MAGAts doth protest too much.
I think they just need to tell themselves it’s okay to masturbate tbh
You’re probably not too far off.
No, no, no, I want to be very far away when that starts happening
Or eat some more corn flakes and graham crackers.
Ah yes, viagran’t
its how discourse works in the fascist mind, and with their weird necessarily-violent dominating humiliating concept of sexuality.
-
Well, she was a cop. Blue lives matter? 🤷
It’s the same reason they yell about gay people
The real reason JD Vance cares Kamala is “childless”
“I saw a picture of [Harris] on Time magazine today. She looks like the most beautiful actress ever to live,” Trump said. “She’s a beautiful woman, so we’ll leave it at that.”
So, definitely yes. Trump compared her beauty to his wife…? It was a very weird interview.
What is this curse thrust upon me; to only lust after that which I cannot have!
-JD Vance in IKEA, probably
Protect me, Maria Don’t let this siren cast her spell Don’t let her fire sear my flesh and bone Destroy SÖDERHAMN And let her taste the fires of hell Or else let her be mine and mine alone
¿Por que no Los dos?
I feel like I missed something…
There’s a flag going around of something like, “she’s as open as our borders” with a drawn picture of Harris with her legs spread open suggestively.
Yes.
Both.
Rule 34.
funny thing is when harris was compared to a hyena some furries started drawing her as an anthro hyena
