https://archive.li/O1cSJ

‘Google decided that work-life balance was more important than winning’

OK Eric, but how do you win without employees?

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
    link
    English
    1261 month ago

    “I’m sorry to be so blunt,” Schmidt continued in the video posted on Stanford’s YouTube channel on Tuesday. “But the fact of the matter is, if you all leave the university and go found a company, you’re not gonna let people work from home and only come in one day a week if you want to compete against the other startups.”

    If I were going to found a company I’d make it remote only because I’d have access to a global labor pool, often in places with lower cost of living, and I won’t have to pay for an office. Seems like a win-win.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      if you want to compete against the other startups

      i’m guessing he offered approximately zero data to support the claim that WFH startups always lose against office-only startups?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 month ago

      I absolutely would do that, in point of fact. And, like, tons of successful startups started in a founder’s (or even founder’s parent’s) basement or garage. So I don’t know what this C-suite dipshit thinks he’s on about.

    • synae[he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 month ago

      What an absurd statement. Absolute lunacy on his part to compare Google to a startup.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
        link
        English
        111 month ago

        He’s speaking to a bunch of Standford students and giving advice, so it’s not that absurd. But it is pretty absurd to tell potential entrepreneurs “Make sure you pay as much as possible for real estate in a big city, and then overpay for talent because your office is in a big city.”

        • @Xenny
          link
          91 month ago

          If his goal is for his company to win I wouldn’t be taking his advice.he has a financial incentive to sabotage future competition

        • synae[he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 month ago

          Talking to students at Stanford about startups is fine. Projecting his concerns about WFH employees for his own company onto them is nonsense and disingenuous, as Google is about the furthest they could possibly be from a startup nowadays.

  • AmbiguousProps
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1031 month ago

    Working from home will always be my priority over commuting for two hours. Get fucked, ex-CEO.

  • @apfelwoiSchoppen
    link
    501 month ago

    Google’s ex-CEO blames remote working for (insert anything wrong with his business).

  • @Shadywack
    link
    English
    361 month ago

    An ex-CEO dipshit who got ran off because he fucked around too much, and he pretends that his old stodgy ethically bankrupt perspectives mean shit. That’s hilarious.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    241 month ago

    Google decided that work-life balance was more important than winning

    Yes. Work-life balance is quite literally the most important aspect of any job, arguably second only to pay. If an employer doesn’t agree, then they’re not my employer.

    Sorry, you psychopathic oligarch fuck, but people have better things to do than work themselves to death to buy you a 54th yacht. Maybe try moving to an apartheid state if that’s what you want. It worked for the Musks.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    241 month ago

    The same asshole who said that you shouldn’t mind the privacy concerns if you’ve got nothing to hide. That’s how you know his opinions are valuable.

  • @Tylerdurdon
    link
    191 month ago

    As a remote worker, I blame leadership that lacks talent and skill.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 month ago

    To my ears the headline gets it backwards. He blamed remote working for the company’s AI woes, or blamed the company’s AI woes on remote working. Not sure if this is a typo or a legitimate different use of language.

    • Jack
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      No no, he is blaming AI for the remote working. He wants the AIs to come work from the office. /s

  • @EndOfLine
    link
    English
    141 month ago

    This guy is a complete tool who sounds angry at Google for personal reasons.

    I have worked for several successful startups with remote work policies. The employees don’t “work like hell” because they are in an office. They do it because THEY HAVE EQUITY. If the startup prospers and does well then so do the employees. I’ve never had a coworker decide to stay late because of access to a communal fridge and public bathroom. I have, however, known them to work harder to improve their chances of an early retirement.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 month ago

    I mean he has a point. When I want to find information, do I do that from my home via the browser, or do I go to the Google headquarters to have a look at the servers myself? Of course I would never do that from my browser.

    The thought alone… How inconvenient that would be. Start up my computer, open the browser, TYPE IN my query like some medieval peon. Laughable!