

“The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact-check.”
“The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact-check.”
Wait until you find out what they do with books.
Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Thursday.
Honestly not sure if he thinks social media is how POTUS communicates with other world leaders or if this is just a show and he does not realize how weak and impotent this makes him look.
I was attempting to responding to your question of “How is this a meme?” with why I considered it a meme.
I’m really confused about your response. In one sentence you say that I both made and did not make a meme. Can you clarify which you consider it to be?
You also claim to not be offended, but your started displeasure with my connent is a clear demonstration of being offended, by definition.
I would still like to hear what you think make a good meme. Your feedback might help me to make better content in the future.
I apologize if my post offended you by it’s structure. I always thought of a meme as a cultural piece of information, often in the form of an image, that is spread online. Is your issue that you feel I was attempting to convey too much information or is it the word count or is it my reitteration in the text of the post or is it something else entirely?
I’d like to know what your definition / qualifications are for a meme as it seems mine might be too broad.
That does not sound like any liberal behavior that I am aware of. Do you have any examples that you can share? I would be interested to know what racist/sexist/xenophobic groups are claiming to be liberal.
Maybe not a “plan”, per se, but surely there’s a concept of a plan, right?
Is his strategy to force the Republicans in Congress to do their job and take away the power they gave him to impose teriffs so he can then say…
“My plan, and it was a great plan. Many smart people looked at it and said it was the smartest plan they had ever seen for any economy every. The smartest plan. None of them had never heard a plan as smart as mine. They could barely believe it when they heard it. It was such a good plan, but those Liberals in Congress stopped it. It was working. All the best economu people in all the world said it was working and was going to be the best most amazing thing anybody had ever seen. Because it was. It was doing the greatest any president had ever done for this country, but they said no. Why would they do that? Maybe they don’t want to make America great again. Because that’s what my amazing plan was doing, but maybe they don’t want that. My amazing plan that everybody agreed was the best plan ever. So much better than any other plan, but they blocked it. We need better people in Congress. People who will work with me, not against me.”
Pretty sure that’s the type of content reality shows provide.
These narcissist CEOs cannot grasp the idea that “life” is employees working for themselves and pursuing their own interests instead of working for others.
What kind of commitment does Reid Hoffman have towards seeing his employees win?
What kind of profit sharing do LinkedIn employees enjoy? What’s the salary / compensation disperancy look like between the average employee and the C-Suite executives? What’s the medical insurance and parental leave packages look like? What about education reimbursement?
Seriously, who is “winning” in Reid Hoffman’s ideal scenario?
Check out Rubin and Ed. Not the same type of a WTF movie experience but worth a watch if you appreciated Kung Fury.
Link to the Earthjustice page on this case.
Anybody else reminded of Freedom Fries?
And one is still on my “to watch” list, but I am optimistic about it …
The first time I read Clive Barker.
deleted by creator