• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    How about you just stop doing car chases and endangering everyone?

    During a pursuit in West Memphis, Arkansas, a state trooper attempted a tactical vehicle immobilization technique known as a PIT maneuver twice in attempts to stop a fleeing Tesla Model Y, but both times the vehicle accelerated out of reach and was only stopped after driving over a tire-deflation device.

    Yeah, great idea, pushing a car into a spin while at high speed could never go wrong. Turns out just calling ahead and blocking the road is the thing that actually works.

  • @AA5B
    link
    411 month ago

    Seems like these chases are the very definition of ones you need to call off before someone gets killed. If a car is out-accelerating an already fast police car, you’re already endangering everyone around

    • paraphrand
      link
      English
      30
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      we must escalate the situation, it’s the American way.

    • @copd
      link
      81 month ago

      Helicopters and drones with lagging ground units is the way.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    151 month ago

    There is a solution to this:

    1. Witness offense

    2. Take picture/video of offense with numberplate visible

    3. Send ticket via mail

    4. Collect fine via bank transfer

    5. (Profit) be done with it.

    • threelonmusketeers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That would probably work for small offenses like speeding, but not for larger crimes like a jewelry heist or something. You’d still have to chase them down in that case, no?

      • @Skyrmir
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        No one outruns a radio, and pretty much never a helicopter either.

        • @wreckedcarzz
          link
          English
          31 month ago

          pulls out my jammer and rocket launcher

          GTA has taught me well

        • @asdfasdfasdf
          link
          1
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          They can’t drive off the side of the road and run into the forest or something?

  • Iceblade
    link
    81 month ago

    No need. If they’re going that fast, just put a chopper on them and pick them up when they run out of juice. Shouldn’t be too long.

    • @wreckedcarzz
      link
      English
      11 month ago

      While the chopper follows the dummy, do the real heist and make a clean getaway.

      Did nobody watch 2 Fast 2 Furious?

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
    link
    English
    31 month ago

    I’m surprised they didn’t just require manufacturers to install acceleration limiters and remote kill switches. Hopefully they never do.

    • @JoshuaFalken
      link
      21 month ago

      Speed limiters on commercial trucks already exist. They could be applied to private cars too. Not sure why, on public roads, there is much of a reason to drive 100 miles per hour. Many cars can go beyond that.

      I agree about a remote kill switch. That has too high a potential to be abused. A limiter though, one that was fixed and not variable based on anything, would be fine I think.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -6
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I would 100% support electronic speed limiters and acceleration limiters on public roads.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        41 month ago

        And then when you need to accelerate to avoid an accident, there’s not enough power and BLAMMO! Slow cars are dangerous cars.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          There are probably 1000x more situations where you accelerate into a crash, rather than out of one. Slow cars are safe cars.

          • @JoshuaFalken
            link
            11 month ago

            Just chiming in to say I see your point. Slower cars allow for more reaction time, and therefore safer reactions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        if that was the law how would you enforce it in any meaningful way? People would overide/not have them.

        Well we’d just force them! How!!?! Mechanically minded people mod cars everyday. Then police would have more reason to F with everyone at their pleasure. You would for sure need more surveillance from the state. Probably need more expensive proprietary anti-consumer tech inside the car you own.

        Do you know why I pulled you over? Your car transponder isn’t transmitting properly.

        Do you see what you want unleashed?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          if that was the law how would you enforce it in any meaningful way?

          Through the OEM. Wouldn’t be hard to create a system that tracks location locally using GPS and electronically applies an according speed limit from a govt database

          Acceleration is a simple matter of distance/time/time.

          Mechanically minded people mod cars everyday.

          People break all sorts of laws every day. It doesn’t mean you don’t bother making them.

          Then police would have more reason to F with everyone at their pleasure.

          Actually they’d have less, considering cars would be physically incapable of speeding.

          You would for sure need more surveillance from the state. Probably need more expensive proprietary anti-consumer tech inside the car you own.

          …for what?