Donald Trump has quietly wound down his presidential campaign in states he was targeting just six weeks ago amid polling evidence showing that Kamala Harris’s entry into the presidential race has put them out of reach and narrowed his path to the White House.

The Republican presidential nominee’s campaign has diverted resources away from Minnesota, Virginia and New Hampshire – states Trump was boasting he could win while Joe Biden was the Democratic candidate – to focus instead on a small number of battleground states.

Money is being poured into the three “blue wall” states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, which were all carried by Biden in 2020 and are seen as vital to the outcome of November’s election.

MBFC
Archive

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    573 months ago

    Unfortunately Harris’ lead in the polls in the battleground states has dropped a little bit. I’m guessing that is due to RFK Jr dropping out.

  • @grue
    link
    English
    573 months ago

    Trump doesn’t care if he legitimately gets the most votes in any particular state. All he cares about is having MAGA election officials refuse to sign off on the counts in order to cause enough chaos and distrust that the MAGA SCOTUS steps in and either hands him the presidency directly or declares enough results invalid that the decision gets punted to a “one state, one vote” poll in the House (which would be absolutely dominated by red states in that situation).

  • Tiefling IRL
    link
    fedilink
    45
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I love that the election is decided by 3 states containing less than 10% of the population

    Pennsylvania: 13M
    Wisconsin: 6M
    Michigan: 10M
    Total US: 333M
    29/333 = 8.7%

    • AmidFuror
      link
      fedilink
      273 months ago

      That’s like saying the first 94 meters of a 100 meter race don’t matter because the last 6 meters decide the winner. If you don’t finish the last 6 meters ahead, you’ve lost.

      • @makyo
        link
        English
        73 months ago

        That’s not exactly the best comparison though because you have to run all 100 meters in the foot race, but in the presidential race you basically don’t have to run at all in the majority of states.

      • @stoly
        link
        33 months ago

        Zeno’s paradox in political format.

      • @jumjummy
        link
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That analogy doesn’t work because in these models it’s a straight tie for those 94 meters and it’s the last 6 meters that are left. If the polling data is accurate (big if of course), then the other 47 states cancel each other out in EC votes, so it’s down to these 3.

        • @Cryophilia
          link
          13 months ago

          I think you might not understand how analogies work.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I mean, if you’re going to use that metric, you might as well go smaller, because a lot of people in those states have already made up their mind. It’s only voters who might be willing to choose or adjust their vote that are in play.

      Only the states that are still undecided enough to tip, and within those, only the voters whose position is still undecided enough to potentially tip.

      • @Windex007
        link
        83 months ago

        Yeah. Not unreasonable to say maybe 1% of registered voters are in play, so maybe 200,00 people or so.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          63 months ago

          Less than that in the 2000 election even if Gore wasn’t fucked over by SCOTUS.

        • @RupeThereItIs
          link
          13 months ago

          Trump won Michigan by less then 10,000 votes in 2016. Tightest presidential outcome in the states history.

          And that was after Hillary both ignored and insulted the rust belt.

      • @joostjakob
        link
        33 months ago

        Isn’t it as much about showing up to vote than about changing minds who to vote for?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      93 months ago

      Those 3 states are huge, but the other swing states are definitely still a factor. If Harris wins all 3 Blue Wall states, she very likely will win the presidency. However, if she doesn’t win all 3, then either candidate’s victory will likely be decided by the other swing states - Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina, and Georgia.

    • @FlowVoid
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s being decided by all the states. Swing states are simply the ones that pollsters can’t accurately predict.

    • @Twentytwodividedby7
      link
      -13 months ago

      Well, on average each state has 2% of the population. So, you could say any state with more than 6m people represents an above average population

    • @Dkarma
      link
      -23 months ago

      It’s not but ok

  • @UnderpantsWeevil
    link
    English
    30
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The Republican presidential nominee’s campaign has diverted resources away from Minnesota, Virginia and New Hampshire

    Uh… how many you got left? Is this going to end with Trump doing donuts in a Pittsburgh Walmart parking lot, hoping to swing the Hooner vote?

    Money is being poured into the three “blue wall” states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin

    Oh, honey. You’re not winning Wisconsin.

  • @garretble
    link
    English
    183 months ago

    JackNicholsonYes.gif

    • SolidGrue
      link
      English
      163 months ago

      deleted by creator