So as you may know, i am a guy mostly focused on privacy. Basically, insead of google i use SearXNG. (Privacy focused search engine) However, when i went to change the default search engine in safari, there was no option to add a custom search engine.

This really pissed me off. So how come Apple allows changing default browsers in the EU, but not search engines?

  • zelifcamdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you’re looking for a free way to do it. The “Hyperweb” extension lets you.

      But this is an imperfect solution as it just redirects, and your search still gets sent to your safari default + it takes longer to load.

    • aluminium
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      Safari is just way better integrated in the System and its not like Firefox on iOS is the real firefox. Its webkit with a Firefox skin.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        What system integration do you want? I personally wish Apple didn’t restrict the usage of certificates to safari but that’s about it. But I only use iOS on my work phone. My personal phone is an Android.

        • mrvictory1
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          FF iOS still offers Mozilla sync and partial ad blocking but no extensions are available.

  • profdc9
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    When Apple figures out a way to maximize its profit by extorting those search engines.

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I use Arc Browser on iOS you can click search for me and it will peruse the top links to your search query and use an LLM to extract the information you want so you can avoid the cancer that is modern websites plagued with ads and burying the leed.

  • estutweh@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    What did Apple tell you when you asked? Did you think anyone here knows the answer?

    • Swarfega@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’d have thought Google is more invasive than Apple? I say this as an Android user…

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      So what are the alternatives? Android and even more spying? Degoogled Android and having to log into the website for your bank every time you want to send someone money?

      Apple’s the devil, but when your alternatives are “Devil Plus” and “Lose access to half the stuff you even need your phone for”, I’ll stick with the Devil.

    • prousername@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      What type of problem though? I don’t see anything wrong with using an apple product while maintaining my privacy.

      • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        Apple isn’t any good for privacy. Just as Google, it’s a single big company that gets full control over your device. There are many examples of them exploiting it, by hashing your launched apps on Mac to check for malware, for example. Their systems are also known for being a lot more locked down than the rest, meaning getting rid of telemetry is not an easy task. Big companies are not interested in your privacy, they are interested in profit. And the profit they can get by building your profile is a lot more valuable for them than you as a user. That being said, the guy is right, but he is out of line.

          • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I mean, they where hashing any lauched programs and sending the hashes unencryped to their servers to compare against their database. So, they literally knew every program you launched, when you did it, but also your ISP knew it and anyone smart enough to MITM your connection. Sounds like a privacy violation to me.

            • Sam Clemente@allthingstech.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              @TwilightKiddy I can see how you can get there, but the MITM would need to know the hashing algo, you can’t *really* just un-hash something, at least not reliably

              But your original statement was that the hashing was the privacy violation, and that’s the part I took issue with, hashing is a generally accepted security measure, it is not inherently a privacy violation

        • prousername@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well idk if this counts, but when i started caring abt my privacy i filled my icloud storage with garbage so that it does not back up any pictures. (also i dont have a mac)

          • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s not really about something specific. There are just a lot of examples of Apple doing weird shit with your data and only stopping when they got caught. Most people conserned with privacy just don’t trust Apple in general.