• @Stovetop
    link
    132 months ago

    Although parliament in the 1700’s was exclusively comprised of the rich…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 months ago

    Surely we can do better now.with all our modern tech. Stronger ropes that can be re-used.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      Yeah except the subject of the debate would be over the poor schmuck who pointed out the issue was the bankers.

      “Oh behalf of our bosses the bankers should we use the quantum killing machine on Mr.Reporter or should we use the stem-cell generated murder beast?”

      • @egrets
        link
        72 months ago

        Robert Molesworth in a session on 12th August 1720:

        in his Opinion, they ought, on this Occasion, to follow the Example of the ancient Romans, who having no Law against Parricide […] adjudg’d the guilty Wretch to be thrown alive, sew’d up in a Sack, into the Tyber. […] As he look’d upon the Contrivers and Executors of the villainous South Sea Scheme, as the Parricides of their Country, he should be satisfy’d to see them undergo the same Punishment.

        No specific mention of snakes, but that was part of the Roman “punishment of the sack”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        it was just one group of rich greedy people turning on another group of rich greedy people. Nothing to get excited about.

        Sounds better than what we currently have:

        Groups of poor desperate people turning on other groups of poor desperate people.