What would you expect from a seahorse though, am I right?

  • TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    6 months ago

    There are these two young fish swimming along and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says, “Morning, boys. How’s the water?” And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes, “What the hell is water?”

    — David Foster Wallace, This is Water

      • 5765313496
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        80
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yeah, but would you be aware if you hadn’t learned about it in school?

        Oh wait. Fish spend lots of time in school. Dang.

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          There are lots of effects you cannot explain without air. Even if you haven’t been to school, you can observe wind, use a hairdryer, blow up balloons, fly a drone etc.

          • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            6 months ago

            And “air” as a word dates back to both Latin and Greek “aer”, probably from proto-Indo-European “awer” so it’s pretty much been the same word in European since civilization was a thing.

        • Landless2029
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I vaguely recall reading about people not knowing the science of wind and air. They explain trees swaying in the wind as spirits.

    • Rolando
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Fish forget they live in water; people forget they live in the Tao” -Confucius?

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think the saying about fish not being aware of water is nonsense. People are aware that there’s air around them, without having to know any science. They can feel the wind, their own breath, etc. Fish have that plus they need to push against water in order to move. A fish that didn’t know what water was would be like a land animal that didn’t know what the ground was.

    • LesserAbe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ll have you know fish are fucking idiots

    • Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think you underestimate our past ignorance. It took many decades of science being taught for the general population to “know” that air exists.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I think the general population always knew that there was a transparent substance all around them which had to keep going in and out of their lungs or they would die - the “breath of life” from the Bible. I mean, even an uneducated peasant in ancient times could blow bubbles underwater and see that there was something coming out of his mouth.

    • Ironfacebuster
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m not entirely sure if a fish would actually know what water is lmao

      The FOOLS fall for little pieces of plastic with metal in them, so there’s no way they know what water is

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wasn’t Davinci one of the first to think about air that way? Welll, maybe aside from some ancient greek philosophers.

        • bitwaba
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          The idea was first documented in a memo that Metcalfe wrote on May 22, 1973, where he named it after the luminiferous aether once postulated to exist as an “omnipresent, completely passive medium for the propagation of electromagnetic waves.”

          Hmm, I really thought there would be some clever name I didn’t understand, but it really is that aether.

  • neatchee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 months ago

    How many ways can we rewrite the allegory of the cave?

  • burgersc12@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    Stupid seahorse can form complex sentences but can’t analyze the water around him like some kinda simple animal!!

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 months ago

    I have a friend who believes in magic, and that we can’t see it for the same reason this sea horse is confused about the ocean

    • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why would you think that? It literally reacted to what the guy said about water.

  • Maggoty
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    You want a shower thought? H2O is just another gas, compressed. We live in the ocean too, just the upper part with lighter gases.