• @xantoxis
    link
    English
    205 hours ago

    Can someone kick this guy in the nuts? I don’t really care about this news, I just think that should happen to him, every day.

  • circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    257 hours ago

    Republicans can endorse Harris all day long and I’m here for it.

    Manchin endorsing Harris would have actually done her a disservice.

      • @stoly
        link
        44 hours ago

        More like a Dixiecrat. Old school southern Democrat.

      • Pegajace
        link
        English
        669 hours ago

        Not even. He officially left the Dems and registered as independent earlier this year.

        • @lennybird
          link
          English
          309 hours ago

          I for one am very happy to rid the party of these scumbags: Manchin, Gabbard, Sinema.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              27 hours ago

              Fetterman is bad on Israel-Palestine but I thought he was otherwise ok re: democracy, women’s rights, etc? Am I wrong? He’s not my rep so I’m actually asking.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                16 hours ago

                He always struck me as a guy who is who he is. He would fail any ideology test because he goes by his gut rather than any ideological compass. I think he felt his supporters were being a bit mercurial for opposing him so vehemently on Israel. Not really an excuse, but I think he just lost his shit and lost his way. So probably a decent guy but he has to do a lot of work to repair that bridge and I have no idea if he’s up to it.

                But I could be wrong.

          • Ghostalmedia
            link
            English
            118 hours ago

            Gabbard and Sinema are people that can be replaced with other democrats, but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking a more progressive person would likely get elected for Manchin’s West Virginia seat.

            Manchin may suck, but he caucuses with the dems and puts the dems 2 seats over the majority line. Which means his existence currently allows the Chuck Schumer to replace Mitch McConnell, which means the dems control what comes to the floor in the senate.

            • @PapaStevesy
              link
              57 hours ago

              They just can’t pass anything. But yeah, it is still better than what the other side would bring to the floor.

              • Ghostalmedia
                link
                English
                16 hours ago

                Don’t forget executive appointments. A GOP can block the appointment of normal judges and can fast track weirdos if someone like Trump is in office.

                It’s more than passing laws.

            • Billiam
              link
              16 hours ago

              On the one hand, this matters because it allows the Senate to actually approve qualified judges to the federal bench, instead of the insane ideologues the GOP puts there.

              On the other hand, all the federal judges in the world mean very little when SCOTUS is as thoroughly corrupt and extreme-right as it is, and has no issue overturning whatever cases they want to achieve the decision they’ve already arrived at.

              On the other other hand, Manchin got to obstruct otherwise-popular legislation from either passing, or even being brought up for a vote merely by threatening to vote against it.

              On the whole we’re definitely better than we were before Biden took office, but I wouldn’t put too much emphasis on Manchin. The successes of the Biden administration are despite Manchin, not because of him.

      • Ghostalmedia
        link
        English
        15 hours ago

        Honestly, I’ll take it.

        Dude could be a Home Depot Halloween skeleton for all I care. He caucuses with the Dems, which means that he helps push the Dems over 50% in the senate, which means the Dems control political appointments and what get brought to the floor.

        I’ll take him over Mitch McConnell back in power.

      • @someguy3
        link
        29 hours ago

        Remember RINO was a term before the party switch. It was used for people deemed not progressive enough.

  • @randon31415
    link
    75 hours ago

    “It’s the only thing that keeps us talking and instead of working together.”

  • @gAlienLifeform
    link
    799 hours ago

    The fact that Biden called for this exact same thing and Manchin was ok endorsing him but has to make a big scene when a non-white woman calls for doing the same thing basically tells you everything you need to know about Manchin

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -29
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I think there are more differences between Kamala and Joe besides melanin levels and genitalia structure but okay I guess

      Edit: Oh, I guess Kamala really is Biden in an Indian-African-American woman’s body after all, nvm

      • @kikutwo
        link
        159 hours ago

        According to Ron Desantis, you can’t discuss genitals. His Wehrmacht is en route to your location now.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 hours ago

          SS or Gestapo would be more accurate, not saying the Wehrmacht was clean just that the SS and Gestapo were the direct enforcers.

          • @kikutwo
            link
            16 hours ago

            But they are busy knocking on the doors of the residents who voted wrong.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              14 hours ago

              The way you said this made me think of like an underfunded and understaffed Gestapo and SS. Which is a rather amusing thought, “Verdamnit Hans we need to round up the degenerates but Klein was hit by a fucking car and we dont have enough people to cover his fucking shift”.

  • @Veedem
    link
    English
    309 hours ago

    Why not just make the filibuster what it used to be and require the people who want to wield it to hold the floor for hours upon hours with no break? Some of it was silly. Some of it heroic. Either way, it required someone to truly be willing to stand behind their beliefs and, thus, was used much less often.

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
      link
      75 hours ago

      I also liked the idea of a minority vote (2/5) to sustain a filibuster. If you don’t have 40 supporters, on the floor, then the filibuster ends.

    • @Chee_Koala
      link
      66 hours ago

      This seems like such a fair way to add some discomfort to filibustering and making it a bit less appealing.

    • @MegaUltraChicken
      link
      108 hours ago

      it required someone to truly be willing to stand behind their beliefs

      Conservatives don’t typically have these, and the ones that do know how unpopular they are. That’s why they fight against any attempt to reign it in.

  • @jordanlundM
    link
    219 hours ago

    Manchin was not going to endorse her anyway.

    It’s 42 days to the election, people are voting, if he was going to endorse her it would have been at the convention.

  • TheHiddenCatboy
    link
    English
    229 hours ago

    I’d seen the quote, but not the withholding of endorsement. Well, I guess he’s going to join the ‘both sides bad’ crowd.

    Still. What does his opinion matter? He’s leaving the Senate next year so his proper alt-Right replacement can take over…

  • @cabron_offsets
    link
    89 hours ago

    Manchin not endorsing IS an endorsement. Harris should run commercials.

  • @draneceusrex
    link
    69 hours ago

    Holy Grail? An item given no special meaning in the Bible, and was blown out of proportion in importance by fiction writers a thousand years later? I guess Manchin doesn’t really think the filibuster is too important then.

    • @jordanlundM
      link
      59 hours ago

      No special meaning and not in the Constitution.