• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    855 hours ago

    Entire HR Team Fired After Manager Uses His Own Resume To Prove Their System Is Auto-Rejecting All Candidates Says Reddit User.

    Fixed the title of this useless article.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    130
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Why is this a news article? It’s a reddit comment to a reddit post. And while I like to take things at face value, believing a reddit post is another level of gullible.

    • @saddlebag
      link
      215 hours ago

      This author and site should be ashamed for posting this is as real. Pretty much everything on the front page now is generated content by bot accounts with a single post that got tens of thousands of upvotes.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)
        link
        -34 hours ago

        lemmy became reddit in record time because the admins can’t be fucked to police their fuckdamn mods

    • @Shrp91
      link
      235 hours ago

      That entire site is about the same quality if not worse.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -14 hours ago

      The fall of Rome came from the lack of original thought and everything being derivatives of derivatives.

      We’re here now.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        347 minutes ago

        Uhh… what? Not saying that those things aren’t real today, but are you sure they were the cause of the fall of Rome? lmao

      • Vaquedoso
        link
        357 minutes ago

        I feel that’s a line taken from Foundation by Asimov, describing the fall of the galactic empire

      • @krashmo
        link
        32 hours ago

        That’s a retarded description of the fall of Rome.

  • @LesserAbe
    link
    154 hours ago

    Short version: Reddit commenter says their resume system was automatically rejecting all candidates because it was looking for familiarity with the language “AngularJS” instead of “Angular”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      153 hours ago

      I think the point of the article is not that there was one word mistakenly written, but that an entire department lied for months and never bothered to test their system, and that they felt it was normal to do so. In other words, the problem here was the human factor. Typos are going to happen no matter what you do, and if you’re not planning around them then you suck at your job.

  • @IMongoose
    link
    366 hours ago

    I had a pre interview from someone from HR once and it was excruciating. They didn’t know wtf I was talking about and I had to repeat myself many times over for very well known tools in my field. Now that I am the one looking over resumes I would never want HR to screen anyone, because they can’t possibly know what makes a good candidate for every single position or even how to read qualifications correctly.

    • @JigglySackles
      link
      144 hours ago

      A good HR prescreen asks more about the fitment/personality of the person. I still think that should be up to the hiring manager because too many HR depts suffer from dunning-kruger and have too much power for a generally way too petty group of people.

      • bizarroland
        link
        fedilink
        52 hours ago

        A good HR pre-screen include somebody who’s currently working in the department that they are hiring for, who has field knowledge of the position to see how the two of you mesh.

        Fitment is more about how personalities match than it is with making the HR person feel good about you, and if the HR person cannot even understand the job that you do then how can they judge how well you would fit with the other people who do?

  • Bakkoda
    link
    fedilink
    English
    447 hours ago

    The amount of time recruiters contact me after i decline with “I had no idea you had [insert qualification started clearly on my resume] experience” is 100% of the time.

    • The Snark Urge
      link
      English
      347 hours ago

      If all human resources was being part scam and part class warfare on purpose, it’s not clear what they’d be doing differently

    • @SpaceNoodle
      link
      236 hours ago

      One of my favorites was the one that contacted me saying that my experience at Microsoft made me an ideal candidate. They never responded after I pressed them for specifics.

      I have never worked for Microsoft.

      • @toynbee
        link
        154 hours ago

        I used to have the title “system administrator” in my resume. I guess recruiters were just going off of single keyword searches because I’d get all kinds of emails about unrelated administrative positions like “social security administrator.”

        My favorite example was when I got invited to apply for the position of “ocean administrator.” I looked it up at the time and it seemed to be about directing shipping traffic, but it’s more fun to imagine that I would have been in some way directing the ocean itself.

    • @JigglySackles
      link
      -1
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I have a simple rule that’s worked out really well for me to avoid getting recruiters like that. If their name is foreign, I don’t answer. To be clear, this isn’t me “doing a racism”. If they are from a company I’ve worked with and know to be good I’ll still pick up. But generally if they have an Indian name, they are part of a resume farm and not paying any attention. I’ve also started seeing ones from Africa this year that caught me off guard. Tried to talk to a couple before I realized what was going on and stopped answering any of them. What’s really great is when they use the exact same introduction message.

      • @SirDerpy
        link
        53 hours ago

        You can claim it’s not racism a million times. But, that doesn’t change the truth of it.

        I’m a natural US citizen of Indian heritage. I do the same thing as you: filter all recruiters with Indian names. It’s the only practical course of action.

        The difference between us is I admit that it’s racism. I’m far less likely to fall down the slippery slope.

        • @JigglySackles
          link
          02 hours ago

          Racism implies an opinion of superiority based on race. We both filter based on race because of a systemic issue that overwhelming relies on Indian nationals, not a racial issue. I have no problem with indian recruiters from know good companies. If it were racism that wouldn’t be the case. Using the “slippery slope” as some sort of moral justification to it is just a logical fallacy. Do whatever makes you feel better about it though I guess.

          • @BradleyUffner
            link
            English
            117 minutes ago

            No, racism is judging someone purely from an aspect of their race. Like say, ignoring calls from people with Indian sounding names.

          • @SirDerpy
            link
            42 hours ago

            Racism implies an opinion of superiority based on race.

            No. You moved the goal post such that your actions aren’t included. The rest of your post is based on this false premise, minimization, and projection.

            racism

            noun

            Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

            • bizarroland
              link
              fedilink
              -12 hours ago

              I think this wouldn’t be a racism though. This would be prejudicialism.

              People with typically non-english sounding names have in the past called with job offers that have nothing to do with your skill set because they’re not paying attention to your actual resume. Because of those past actions you are preventing any future actions by default.

              It has nothing to do with their race, and everything to do with pattern recognition, which is prejudice.

              The worst possible outcome out of this are that the person doing it misses out on a great job opportunity.

              • @SirDerpy
                link
                02 hours ago

                More white moderates. Sweet.