• @Maggoty
    link
    English
    35 hours ago

    Really? They’re all cute except the Muslims?

  • capital
    link
    English
    510 hours ago

    Atheists: Us too, right?…

    • ✺roguetrick✺
      link
      English
      22 hours ago

      As long as you pay them tribute, they don’t give a fuck.

    • @beebarfbadger
      link
      English
      810 hours ago

      Also known for inventing the phrase “lend me your ear”.

    • @captainlezbian
      link
      English
      571 day ago

      When it comes to religion, yes. When it comes to governance, lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        (As per K&G youtube channel) I learned that when it comes to believe system, the Mongols believe that everyone worships the same god, Tengri, but in varied way in every culture/religion they encounter.

        They believe that as long as everyone submit themselves under the Mongol rule, it means they obey Tengri/Mongolian god.

        There are various religious communities inside the empire but they also don’t bother to do the worst thing possible to obliterate anyone who doesn’t submit to Mongol, regardless their believe.

        But I think in a smaller level it’s also not as simple/straightforward as that. Mongolian Shamans also known to have conflicts with the Khan. Sometimes the Khan kept asking the Shamans to do a ritual over and over again until the result aligns with the Khan’s desire. Or sometimes the Shaman (being a regarded class in their society) have their own political motive to do something against the Khan.

    • IndiBrony
      link
      English
      1820 hours ago

      God damn Mongolians keep breaking down my city wall!!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    881 day ago

    Is this…Mongolian propaganda? Because the Kahns definitely did a whole lot of subjugating, raping and murdering. Not sure that really fits the “coexist” meme…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      681 day ago

      The meme format doesn’t really work, but the joke they’re trying to make is that even though they did all these terrible things, it was never because of religion. In fact, they just didn’t give a fuck in what you believed in. Genghis even allowed religious figures to be exempt from taxation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        401 day ago

        And let’s be honest: the Mongolians were probably not worse than any other invader. War, destruction, looting and raping is kind of par for the course for most civilizations in history.

        • @trolololol
          link
          English
          13 hours ago

          Well sure, but they were really good at it all

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          281 day ago

          Honestly from the limited knowledge I have, Mongolians seemed to be the one of the chillest of invaders. They gave you a clear choice, let us rule you or die. And once they ruled you they allowed many freedoms that crusaders and colonizers didn’t. Their tactics were brutal and I think that’s why people see them as so evil.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      651 day ago

      Yes, they were. Genghis’ Mongols didn’t generally force religious change in the people who they subjugated.

      • The Snark Urge
        link
        English
        44
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s actually a cool belief system from what I’ve read, known as Tengriism; they had their own beliefs but (and I hope I have this right) that whatever religious worldview prevailed locally was considered not just valid as a personal or cultural expression, but actually metaphysically true as well. That seems fantastic, doesn’t it? Patchwork metaphysics.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 day ago

          I’m not an expert but from what I’ve read most ancient world deities were attached to certain geographies (it would be reasonable to sort of leave the boundaries of your gods) so I wonder if this comes from that tradition. The roman catholics sure successfully weaponized monotheism.

          • @captainlezbian
            link
            English
            11 day ago

            That’s one way. Another was syncretism. The Romans famously stole the Greek gods, but they also worshipped isis for example. “That god resonates with me, so sure why not”.

            • The Snark Urge
              link
              English
              221 hours ago

              I just love how fun it would be to believe that yes, god is the Creator of the Cosmos and he lives in the sky, I have a rich cosmogony that tries to explain the Universe and Everything…But also, if you cross that mountain to the west and traverse the river beyond, them you’ll be in another part of our empire where the universe was created by the boogers of a Titan or something like that I was too busy picking up my arrows to listen. Bless them.

              • @captainlezbian
                link
                English
                216 hours ago

                Yeah that era must’ve been weird. I mostly know of the era of antiquity where “these strange people say the god of medicine is the husband of the Queen of the Dead, but we all know he’s a moon god.”

      • @seaQueue
        link
        English
        381 day ago

        Provided you paid your tribute and obeyed the Khan’s laws they were cool with just about everyone. Fail to do either of those things and you’re in for a bad time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I mean pretty consistent with today’s neoliberal values:

          It’s okay to exploit people as long as we don’t discriminate.

          • @seaQueue
            link
            English
            41 day ago

            The neoliberals of the 13th and 14th century

    • The Snark Urge
      link
      English
      231 day ago

      It was mixed. Their subjects were more free to travel, practise religions, and generally exist within the empire than without it. It was just that transition. The Mongols liked to do things the easy way, or the really easy way.

  • @TrousersMcPants
    link
    English
    381 day ago

    I find it interesting how the Mongolian empire has kind of taken a 180 in its historical image. Not long ago they were viewed as just cartoon villains that destroyed everything. But now you see so many people talking about some of the “good” aspects that it almost makes them seem strangely benevolent.

    The reality of course was that they were an empire, and like all empires they steamrolled and destroyed anything that stood in their way while taking advantage of anything that furthered their goals. They probably killed far more people than they helped if you asked anyone living through the time.

    Dan Carlin’s podcast, Hardcore History, has a series called Wrath of the Khans where he talks about this in length and it’s very interesting to think about.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      When people think about Rome they usually imagine the roads and the aquaducts and not so much the crucifixions and the slavery.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Yeah, the Mongolians front-loaded most of their atrocities. Rome was more of a slow burn

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 hours ago

          The Romans steal and call it taxation, rape and call it marriage, murder and call it justice, and declare that the graveyard is peace.

          (paraphrasing a guy whose name I don’t remember)

        • @captainlezbian
          link
          English
          61 day ago

          Rome was both. The mongols raped and slaughtered. The Romans were too civilized to do that as much, instead they just enslaved some of your village so they could die in the mines or fields or construction projects. And then there’s the internal atrocities. Rome had three servile wars and then without easing up even a bit never had another.

          The Kahns were more like the Shahs, conqueror emperors seeking to hold the great titles of the world like emperor of China or pharaoh and in doing so became one. The Romans were like America “we’re different snd our own thing” before being a different kind of brutal

      • @TrousersMcPants
        link
        English
        51 day ago

        Well, they might imagine one specific crucifixion

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 day ago

          Strangely enough I feel like that crucification isn’t much associated with the Romans. Even though the Romans were the ones who carried it out Judas gets almost 100% of the ire.

          Even Jews are given more blame by antisemitic Christians. Like, no one is starting up a pogrom against Italians because their great great great grandpa might’ve been the guy who stabbed Jesus in the ribs.

          • @Shard
            link
            English
            31 day ago

            Theologically, all mankind was to blame because of their sins.

            But it’s far easier to blame a minority and it had the added benefit of pushing whatever agenda the ruling class had.

          • @TankovayaDiviziya
            link
            English
            11 day ago

            I think I read somewhere that in order for the Romans to abnegate their role in killing Jesus, as they transitioned to Christianity, they scapegoated the Jews. Although, it was the people who demanded to crucify Jesus. But of course, anti-semites focused on the ethnicity, instead just ascribing the mob justice to just-- on people.

            My guess is that because Jews reject the divinity of Jesus, the Christians found it fair to oppress the Jews. It is not different though to the crusading missions of later Christians in the medieval Europe. The non-Christians refuse to recognise Jesus Christ as both the son of God and god himself, the either they convert, or else be killed or ostracised.

    • @Skullgrid
      link
      English
      251 day ago

      from my understanding , it’s a chain of

      You see that village over there? they resisted. we burnt everything , killed every man and child, and raped all the women.

      See the other village over there? they joined us, and we gave them access to goods from across the world, the latest technology and treat them better than their previous rulers.

      Your choice.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 hours ago

        I will be your best friend, then work hard in my lab to create a new unstoppable virus that puts an end to multicellular life on this planet.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    431 day ago

    Genghis Khan: Are you good at killing and terrorizing my enemies? Yes? Ok, see those fuckers over there? Conquer them. I don’t care how. Burn it all down. Re-route an entire river. I just want them paying tribute.

  • @samus12345
    link
    English
    21
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Not with the owner of City Wok!

    Or Jin Sakai.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    English
    211 day ago

    They were also great environmentalists who did a lot to fight global warming.