• @NegativeLookBehind
    link
    English
    552 days ago

    Dudes who think Trump is a strong, capable, confident leader have severe daddy issues.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 day ago

      It’s worse than that… These people have severe cognitive issues.

      If they could read, they’d be very upset by what I just wrote.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 days ago

      Or those who never had any option or attempt at bettering themselves, and cheer for someone failing upwards.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        those who never had any option or attempt at bettering themselves,

        That option was always available, it just wasn’t the easy option.

  • @hesusingthespiritbomb
    link
    29
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Almost every time I read an article from a liberally coded publication of how gender affects political affiliation, it comes off as both hopelessly out of touch and extremely patronizing.

    I feel like this article fundamentally misunderstands the issues it is trying to claim expertise on. There was no discussion of the very real struggles men face today. There was also extremely limited discussion on how young men vs older men view gender in politics, a genuine answer on why conservative claims of masculinity under attack resonate with Gen Z men in particular, or a discussion of how some liberals behave in a sexist way themselves.

    The part about “benevolent sexism” was downright insulting. A huge complaint among younger conservative men is “benevolent sexism” towards women in the democratic party. Even a lot of liberals will admit that there’s way too much of the “women are wonderful” effect going around without any real checks on biases.

    This is all of course coming from the guardian, which has had some of the most insufferable takes on gender over the past decade. It’s frustrating enough when some op ed shames every single man for the actions of a few, like the guardian did with catcalling. It’s on another level when they then publish another article by the same author where she complains about not being catcalled after 30 somehow blames men for that too.

    I personally think Trump will underperform with men. I specifically think he himself doesn’t understand the issues young men have, a small minority of his older base have his tuned out without telling anyone, his surrogates focus on the wrong things, and his turnout machine is gonna end up being trash. However I think that going forward democrats will have to put in real genuine work to win over male voters, and that will require acknowledging some uncomfortable truths that they are unable to do.

    As a sidenote, I encourage everyone to read Christine Emba’s op-ed in the Washington Post. It provides a lot better a framework on what’s happening.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      316 hours ago

      I just went to look for the catcalling article you mentioned (it’s this one) and she is obviously not “complaining” about not getting catcalled. Instead, she’s talking about how her ageing affects her sense of self-worth. Her getting catcalled less often is only the impetus of this reflection, not the actual source of her negative feelings.

      • @hesusingthespiritbomb
        link
        313 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure the subtitle of this article was altered since the initial release. The first one was something like “I feel worse now that I’m not being catcalled, and I hate the patriarchy for making me feel that way”.

        Her articles generally consisted of some valid points on feminism mixed with absolutely outrageous statements and claims. The latter was intentionally designed to offend, because the mid 2010s was the peak ragebait era for news.

        As a sidenote I think a huge portion of toxicity in the culture war is just bad faith actors trying to use it to make a profit.

    • @Feathercrown
      link
      English
      71 day ago

      Unfortunately convincing people to understand all this requires a very strongly pushed but very moderate opinion, which is difficult to express in a meaningfully correct way

      • @hesusingthespiritbomb
        link
        111 day ago

        Yeah. One of the lowkey things I’m hoping in a Trump loss is a more nuanced discussion. I feel like you can’t criticize certain things without being called some far right maga incel. It’s exhausting.

        • @Feathercrown
          link
          English
          121 day ago

          I feel like it’s difficult to have a nuanced discussion because people feel a sense of urgency. If the world’s always in crisis, it’s hard to step back and slow down.

          • @hesusingthespiritbomb
            link
            111 day ago

            Yeah but that ends up making everything worse. There’s a whole industry of people who feed off of outrage to grift and push radical opinions. The biggest offenses aren’t even related to gender. As a society we aren’t even able to have a nuanced conversation about benign issues like gas stoves. I don’t know how we’re ever really supposed to tackle bigger issues such as gender when shit like that causes mass outrage.

            • @Feathercrown
              link
              English
              81 day ago

              Yeah. Here’s hoping we can solve a few of the ongoing crises and get back to more nuanced discourse

    • @cybersandwich
      link
      21 day ago

      In your opinion what are those uncomfortable truths?

      • @hesusingthespiritbomb
        link
        81 day ago

        The uncomfortable truths I was referring to was a culture of anti male sexism in parts of the democratic party, as well as a consistent minimization of issues affecting young men.x

        • @cybersandwich
          link
          21 day ago

          Maybe I’m just tired or being dense but I have no idea what you are referring to in the post.

          I was interested in hearing his/her opinion because I enjoyed reading his comment and it sounded like theyd thought about this a decent amount.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness
    link
    fedilink
    442 days ago

    “I don’t see why any man would vote Democrat. It’s not the party of virtue, security. It’s not the party of strength,” Watters said, shortly after White Dudes for Harris held a call with more than 190,000 participants. Watters added: “I heard the scientists say the other day that when a man votes for a woman, he actually transitions into a woman.”

    Uh… what? Are we sure this isn’t a The Onion article?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      222 days ago

      It’s the one trans-healthcare secret doctors don’t want you to find out. I’ll be transitioning in November.

      • @SpaceNoodle
        link
        51 day ago

        Do I have to get a whole new wardrobe? Will my beard fall off?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 day ago

          I plan on early voting next month. I could tell you if mine does. Unless it doesn’t fall off till the ‘offical’ count in November.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      if “will people think i’m alpha if i do this?” plays any part of any decision someone makes, then they’re most definitely not manly, let alone whatever the fuck they define “alpha” as

      • @Soup
        link
        31 day ago

        Alpha means caring deeply about what others think of you and conforming to their expectations, right?

        …right?

  • @Sterile_Technique
    link
    English
    11
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Couldn’t care less what’s in Trump’s or Harris’s pants, nor whether or not voting for either is ‘manly’.

    I don’t want a fucking Nazi in the white house; and Harris’s policy stances are for the most part ones that the US needs.

    I could see gender becoming a factor as a tie breaker if all else were equal, just for representation sake, but all else is not equal: another Trump presidency would be disastrous for way more than just the US, vs Harris being actually qualified for the job. There is no contest here.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 days ago

    if trump is the definition of “manly,” then i’m renouncing and defenestrating every element of masculinity in my being

    except my penis. i’ll keep that just to piss them off