• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    tHe oThEr gUy iS gOing to GenocIdE hArdEr

    I know, he’s a fascist, that’s what they do. You claim to offer an alternative, not a lessened degree, even if history and current events proves that’s a fucking lie.

    I’ll vote for the lesser evil, but I’ll be damned if I do it without calling it evil.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 hour ago

      At least you’re fucking voting. The number of bad faith actors here arguing to protest vote or not vote is scary.

      • @disguy_ovahea
        link
        English
        241 minutes ago

        I’d wager many of them aren’t US citizens anyway.

  • JaggedRobotPubes
    link
    English
    235 hours ago

    No genocide is actually a genocide until it is called a genocide, at which point it is the fault of the person calling it a genocide.

    You can tell it’s true because of how it makes sense.

    • @Iheartcheese
      link
      English
      295 hours ago

      It’s not genocide unless it comes from the genocide region of France

  • @TrickDacy
    link
    English
    135 hours ago

    Ah yes, the idea that many people “support genocide”

    • @draneceusrex
      link
      English
      123 hours ago

      You don’t like genocide, you say? Just wait till you hear about all the fun new things the Republicans have in store for us with Project 2025!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -50
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      i’m thankfully not participating in this election, but one would argue voting for any candidate that supports genocide is a vote in support for genocide.

      • @Soup
        link
        English
        31 hour ago

        You may want to clarify of you’re not participating because you can’t or because you won’t. Because if you can’t for some reason that’s fine, and if you won’t I have a few choice words for you.

      • @surewhynotlem
        link
        English
        544 hours ago

        In a first past the post system, like the US, not voting is the same as voting for whoever you hate more. If you hate them equally, then it’s the same as voting for both.

        The next US president will support genocide. We get to pick between the one who supports it a lot vs a little. We get to pick which one we’d rather protest under.

        The only way to be not complicit is to leave the country and renounce citizenship.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          133 hours ago

          … rather protest under.

          Nailed it. I’m stealing that, and there’s nothing you can do about it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            113 hours ago

            I wouldn’t protest your use, and since that phrase is mine now I can say that!

            Jokes aside, this is exactly it. One option, you can protest it. The other, and you’re getting “a very rough hour, real rough”.

            So… Yeah. Not voting is supporting more murders by the state, and I hope so many people realize they are being duped with their “non-voting protest” and actually go to the polls. Especially because the presidential election is not the only election that matters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 hours ago

        Oh so you’re equally happy with whatever winner? No preference whatsoever? Interesting to see that on an election with such wildly different candidates.

        • @SkyezOpen
          link
          English
          356 minutes ago

          They’re a tankie, so they probably prefer trump.

      • @cm0002
        link
        English
        83 hours ago

        A non-vote is a vote for Trump, a third-party vote under the current US voting system is a vote for Trump.

        I hope you enjoy your Trump vote!

      • @Sterile_Technique
        link
        English
        214 hours ago

        Not really. It’s a pretty easy choice when the options are to maintain genocide vs crank it up to 11.

        …but yeah there’s a 3rd option I wish we had. The absence of ‘no genocide’ doesn’t imply the voter supports genocide, it just means the options are shit.

      • 10_0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 hours ago

        Because the vast majority of people vote because they want genocide. Flawless logic.

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        English
        74 hours ago

        I love when people have such good faith. Good talk.