Georgia’s Republican governor praised Democratic President Joe Biden for reaching out to him in the wake of Hurricane Helene’s deadly devastation as the state and surrounding areas scramble to recover from the disaster.

Former President Donald Trump told a different story when he landed there to survey the damage.

“The governor’s doing a very good job. He’s having a hard time getting the president on the phone,” Trump told reporters. “The federal government is not being responsive.”

It wasn’t true.

Here’s what Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp had to say about Biden and the feds:

The president just called me yesterday afternoon. I missed him and called him right back and he just said, ‘Hey, what do you need?’ And I told him, ‘We got what we need. We’ll work through the federal process. He offered that if there’s other things we need just to call him directly, which I appreciate that,” Kemp said.

“We’ve had FEMA embedded with us since a day or two before the storm hit in our state operating center in Atlanta. We’ve got a great relationship with them,” he said.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    343 hours ago

    But all I’m hearing at work today is “Biden won’t help the hurricane victims! Elon and Trump are teaming up to provide relief, but Kamalala and Biden told them to get a job!!!” I hate this place so much. Trump just lies and they eat it up.

    • @regeya
      link
      133 hours ago

      The Twitter bots started in on that shit before the damn rain stopped and haven’t stopped since. At this point Twitter’s living in a goddamn fantasy world. “Where’s Biden? He hasn’t done ANYTHING!” Meanwhile he issued several emergency declarations? “Where’s Kamala in all this? This is her problem!” …is it? What’s with Twitter bots acting like Kamala Harris is already the President?

    • @MehBlah
      link
      English
      42 hours ago

      Start laughing when they say something like that. Wait until they ask why and say I’ve heard exactly the opposite. It wont convince many but a few might stop watching dubious sources long enough to find out it isn’t true. It the old its easier to fool someone than convince them they have been fooled.

      • @ripcord
        link
        215 minutes ago

        Oh man, if you’ve never worked in an environment like that where you’re outnumbered, you probably don’t understand why this is would be really tough.

    • paraphrand
      link
      English
      22 hours ago

      I’m sorry that you work somewhere that has that sort of discourse going on. Sounds super draining.

  • @funkyfarmington
    link
    43 hours ago

    Would you look at that, a actually functioning government!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    616 hours ago

    On X the MAGA people are constantly saying how Biden did nothing, but the fact is two days before he acted to help the people that were effected.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    2118 hours ago

    and yet, Georgia republicans are going to vote for the asshole that wants to eliminate FEMA and NOAA.

    fuckers.

    • @LifeInMultipleChoice
      link
      667 hours ago

      Not eliminate, just privatize and make money off of it by stiffing every person, company, and publicly owned… Oh wait yeah, just hurting everyone.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        397 hours ago

        If the agencies were privatized, they would cease to exist. That is. Eliminated.

        You don’t get privatized health care from the government, either.

        • @LifeInMultipleChoice
          link
          46 hours ago

          Doubt they would eliminate the names, that would hurt the “creditibility” beholden by the names they would want to use for their gain. I think it would go more like Amtrak, or the Prison systems. Destroying the pieces they don’t want, and making profits off the parts they can. Slowly pushing their agendas hiding behind the name of something they can use a disguise while most of the country never recognizes it changed. The parts they can’t profit off of they would leave as a burden to the people, and the profitable and influencial parts they will strip and grab.

      • @frunch
        link
        196 hours ago

        Oh wait yeah, just hurting everyone.

        You’re forgetting the handful of people that will profit wildly from this, so technically not everyone…just most (99.9% +/-)

        • @EmpathicVagrant
          link
          56 hours ago

          It doesn’t hurt any people, in their eyes we’re just living human capital.

  • @Valmond
    link
    356 hours ago

    Did he launch paper towels to the needy this time?

    • @NJSpradlin
      link
      33 hours ago

      No, but that same dude launched chicken tenders at a crowd over the weekend.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    647 hours ago

    Doesn’t look like it’s driving him crazy. He just lies about it, half of his supporters believe him, and the other half believe “in spirit”. Seems pretty normal.

    • @frunch
      link
      186 hours ago

      That seems like a good way to describe that level of devotion–believing him “in spirit”.

      While some are doing keg-stands with the Kool-Aid, others such as these believers ‘in spirit’ are just casually sipping a Kool-Aid cocktail to be social and/or fit in (or perhaps have succumbed to peer pressure, etc)

      • @jj4211
        link
        54 hours ago

        Scott Adams calls these sorts of lies “directionally true”

  • @Rapidcreek
    link
    0
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I’ve been through quite a number of natural disasters in my life. Flash floods, tornados, and more hurricanes than I can count. I think you can depend on a range of emotions if you’re the victim of such events.

    First, disbelief. Mother nature is all powerful and just awesome. Go outside after the storm and you’ll see some shocking things sometimes. Things you just can’t believe can happen. Second, hopelessness. You wonder what will happen now that you’ve lost everything. It’s very depressing. Hard to understand why you’re a victim and this leads to anger at times. Lastly, there’s the “carry on” when you just go forward because what choice is there?

    I say this as a lens into the on the ground reporting that’s done. Sure, when they put a microphone in front of a victim you should take it with a grain of salt, but really theses emotions are underlying.

    Also have worked a number of recoveries. That is long and tiring work, but actually you get payback constantly by knowing you’re helping people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 hours ago

      What’s the point of this post? Your third paragraph, with the “grain of salt” statement, in context, makes it sound like you think the governor may be lying about the president calling him. Is this accurate?

      • @Rapidcreek
        link
        16 hours ago

        Point is that you’ll see various statements from victims regarding recovery, but they shouldn’t be given the level of truth that most would afford them. Trump lied, of that there is no doubt. It’s a given.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 hours ago

          But what does this have to do within the context of what the article is talking about? Again, it sounds like you are dancing around, but still kind of implying, that the government of Georgia might not be telling the truth when it comes to what Biden has done.

          • @EmpathicVagrant
            link
            56 hours ago

            The grain of salt but was directly tied to interviewing citizens affected by the disaster, saying they’re probably emotional and not fully present when interviewed.

            It was not tied to Kemp, the gov’t, or any of that.

            It’s about the majority of victims affected.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -25 hours ago

              The grain of salt but was directly tied to interviewing citizens affected by the disaster

              Except the only one that was interviewed who could be considered a victim is Kemp. Which is where the confusion came from. If you are saying that victims statements should be taken with a grain of salt, and in the context there is one victim, then it sounds like you are showing some doubt about what they are saying.

              • @Feathercrown
                link
                English
                33 hours ago

                Dude how hard is it to get that this guy wasn’t directly commenting on the article

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  03 hours ago

                  It’s not. I get it now. I’m just pointing out that the confusion was the result of their unrelated comment, rather than their accusation that I “want” it to imply something. I’m explaining what caused the confusion.

          • @Rapidcreek
            link
            46 hours ago

            I know that you want to read some implications between the lines, but there are none.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 hours ago

              Im reading your post in the context of the article. The only one who they got a comment from that could be considered a victim is Kemp, and you said they should be taken “with a grain of salt.” It now appears your post had nothing to do with the article, but just disasters in general.

              It has nothing to do with me wanting anything, but you talking about some kind of unrelated and that causing confusion.

              • @Rapidcreek
                link
                -25 hours ago

                I can see you have strong feelings on the matter, if nothing else from your continuing response. Are you sure you don’t want something? Perhaps if I remove it and promise to never do whatever again you’ll feel better.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  How strong my feelings are about the topic have nothing to do with the point. It’s interesting, however, that you are trying to make this about me rather than the point. That just tells me you realize I’ve made a good point, but don’t want to admit it.