Every year, the arrival of the first NFL game in London brings with it some sort of strategic news leak aimed at goosing interest in American football.

  • @dhork
    link
    63 months ago

    16 international games per year is too many. 16 neutral-site games, with some International and some at those large college stadiums, would be awesome.

    Imagine Steelers-Eagles at Penn State, or Browns-Bengals at Ohio State.

  • @BestTestInTheWest
    link
    43 months ago

    I’ll buck the comment trend here and say as a non US fan, international games are great. I think the NFL should do as many as are feasible without taking away home games from home city fans and without adverse effects on players.

    I’m in Australia which is possibly going to get a game in 2025. Hopefully it will come to Melbourne but if it’s Sydney I’ll definitely fly up regardless of who is playing. It opens up the sport to international fans and grows the game.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      03 months ago

      No one cares about home games.

      It’s a dogshit excuse for football because it makes it impossible for teams to be physically or mentally prepared. It completely destroys the competitive balance of the sport. Single broken games are a huge deal in a short season.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        Does this mean that American Football players are just worse athletes than players of other sports?

        Because I’ve never heard this terrible excuse used for international football, rugby, tennis.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -13 months ago

          No, it means football is incredibly physically and mentally demanding and it’s literally impossible to recover and implement a gameplan in less than the week.

          There’s a reason there has never once in the history of the sport been high quality execution on a non-opener Thursday night game or a single international game. The entire schedule of a full week is necessary to play anything resembling NFL football, which is already heavily compromised by the obscene limitations on practice time.

          • @BestTestInTheWest
            link
            13 months ago

            There’s a reason there has never once in the history of the sport been high quality execution on a non-opener Thursday night game or a single international game.

            Bucs falcons right now is literally proving you wrong.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            03 months ago

            Sounds like hype to me.

            Rugby is far more physically and mentally challenging.

            And it doesn’t require rubber padding because the players know how to take down other people.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              03 months ago

              This is a clearly idiotic hate boner for football from someone who doesn’t even have a rudimentary understanding of it.

              Go away.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                No, its just a sport and when people try and talk them up as some sort of super athletes that are doing incredible things you don’t see in other sports I’ll knock that right down.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -13 months ago

                  Sports are different.

                  If you ask someone to box at a world class level once a week for 4 months, the best case scenario is severe and permanent brain damage. The most likely outcome is that they literally die.

  • @11111one11111
    link
    03 months ago

    Someone needs to assassinate Rodger Goodell.