• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    104 hours ago

    Laughs in single thread solidworks. You want SW to preform? Over clock a dual core to 6ghz.

  • Cassa
    link
    fedilink
    299 hours ago

    Tbh, I want my memes with sources. and this one is strange…

    https://civilizationchronicles.com/roman-engineering-and-mathematics/ claims that mathmatics were essensial to roman engineering.

    whereas this (only abstract avaliable…) https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-66494-0_25 claim that mathmatics were but an auxillary science? 🤔

    nontheless mathmatics seems to have been quite understood and used by the roman engineers building among other things, aqueducts

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      95 hours ago

      Calculus was invented in the late 1600s, almost 2000 years after the Roman aqueducts were built. The Roman engineer would know some geometry, but certainly not calculus.

    • @rockSlayer
      link
      389 hours ago

      The joke is that calculus as a field of mathematics didn’t exist until millennia after the fall of the empire

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
        link
        fedilink
        95 hours ago

        Astrology was so important to the Greeks, they figured out the elliptical orbits of the planets (up to Jupiter) and how to compute them without calculus.

        • @rockSlayer
          link
          75 hours ago

          Right, I’m not denying that. People have always been smart. The problem that calculus solved was the intensely difficult algebra that it replaced

    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      28
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Calculus is a specific field of mathematics, mostly to do with limits, integrals and derivatives. Those all feature very heavily in working out loads and stresses.

      But it’s unfair to say the Roman didn’t have calculus. It wasn’t formal calculus, but they absolutely had mathematics, and the Greeks worked out the exhaustion method a century before the Via Appia was even started.

      You don’t need calculus to do some very impressive building, you can go very very far with experience, rules of thumb and basic maths. Hell, ask any civil engineer and they’ll gladly show you some common formula that makes physicists cry.

      • @EtherWhack
        link
        53 hours ago

        Put simply, you don’t need to know of, or what a certain field of math is to be able to apply the different fundamentals of it.

        As an example. You ever see a basketball player bring out a chalkboard to calculate the trajectory, mass, spin, or force to throw the ball to get it in the basket? No. Over time they all eventually create a physics model in their heads and are able to subconsciously calculate all of that with relative accuracy based on experience, training, and practice. Yet, a lot of those players never took a lick of physics.

      • @bahbah23
        link
        28 hours ago

        Do you happen to know any civil engineers, I would like to see these formulas

        • Tar_Alcaran
          link
          fedilink
          356 minutes ago

          One of the famous ones is laminar flow in a tube or pipe. There’s a very nice physics formula to compute Reynolds number, and when it’s over 3500, flow is usually turbulent, and below 2000 it’s usually laminar. And anywhere in between? Eh, it kinda depends. Unless there are bends in the tube, then it depends even more. Oh, and when your flow is not in a tube, the values wildly vary even more.

          There’s a concept of “angle of repose”, basically at what slope will loosely poured materials sit. There are super complex modern models to compute that, based on grain size and shape. But there’s also a half-page table listing anything from asphalt to coffee beans, which is literally the law in a lot of countries. That table is older than the age of sail in most cases and zero maths went into it.

          And then there is the hilarious official ways to determine the characteristics of concrete and asphalt. The flow test, for example includes the highly scientific steps of “pour into a specific cone and poke 25 times with a two by four, then measure the circle on the floor”. This number is then used in several calculations.

        • @grue
          link
          English
          55 hours ago

          Hi, civil engineer* here. Nah, fam: a lot of the time we don’t even use formulas; we just look shit up in tables or interpolate on a graph!

          (* To be fair, (a) I specialized in traffic, and (b) I didn’t do all that much professional work as a civil engineer before switching to software “engineering” instead. That’s even less mathematically rigorous most of the time, LOL.)