KEY POINTS

  • The Department of Justice late Tuesday indicated that it was considering a possible breakup of Google as an antitrust remedy.
  • The DOJ said it was “considering behavioral and structural remedies that would prevent Google from using products such as Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google search.”
  • The judge has yet to decide on the remedies, and Google will likely appeal, drawing out the process potentially for years.
  • @linearchaos
    link
    English
    31 hour ago

    They already tried to subvert this with alphabet are They going to work in the numbers next?

  • KNova
    link
    fedilink
    52 hours ago

    I know very little about the operating structure of Google, but I wonder how this would work functionally. Doesn’t most of their revenue come from ads? So like you couldn’t have google search’s ad business help to prop up the lines of business that don’t make money (Youtube, chrome development)

    I’m not anti-breakup but I just wonder if this would imperil some of their lines of business. Like would Youtube shove even more ads down your throat post-breakup?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 hours ago

      A great question, Id never considered that previously.

      My instant gut feeling would be that they would all just continue selling adds, but as separate entities?

      Also how does breaking up google work when the current structure is that Alphabet is the primary company now?

  • @Zombiepirate
    link
    English
    666 hours ago

    Neat!

    Do Amazon and Facebook too.

    • @ChocoboRocket
      link
      16
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      And then everything too big to fail! Too big to fail = too big.

      It’s not like the knowledgeable people, or systems/infrastructure all disappear if a business fails. Business is basically a bunch instructions for people moving a bunch of shit around for money. Literally nothing about it is so unique it cannot be reproduced.

      And then also Physically split up Elon, billionaires need to learn how to exist in a society of laws and consequences instead of above it.

      • @Postmortal_Pop
        link
        84 hours ago

        Physically split up Elon

        Draw and quarter the rich

    • @A_Random_Idiot
      link
      English
      396 hours ago

      Lets call back to classics and do it to AT&T again, too.

      • @Zombiepirate
        link
        English
        115 hours ago

        There should just be a law that just periodically breaks up AT&T every few years.

        • @chuckleslord
          link
          55 hours ago

          There should just be a law that just periodically breaks up AT&T all companies every few years.

          Given capitalisms inevitable march towards monopoly, this would just be good business.

      • @Addv4
        link
        35 hours ago

        AT&T classic or new AT&T (Verizon, sprint/t-mobile)?

    • Sabata
      link
      fedilink
      95 hours ago

      Also break up ISPs. I have the local monopoly and 4 red herrings providers allowed to operate to give the illusion of competition.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 hours ago

        And force fiber installation. I have plenty of fiber in my area… it just stops at the boundary of every apartment complex.

  • Th4tGuyII
    link
    fedilink
    386 hours ago

    I have no doubt Alphabet Google would try to delay any breakup as long as physically possible, but this would be a huge win against big tech if it went ahead. It’d probably be quite the win for public privacy as well, as it’d decouple these widely used platforms from Google.

  • @TokenBoomer
    link
    34 hours ago

    Why not shoot for the moon with only 3 months left?

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    -236 hours ago

    “considering” is entirely the problem with this conservative democrat president

    • @Eatspancakes84
      link
      226 hours ago

      There are the Trump cases that are objectively easy to prosecute (especially the stolen document case), since the law is clear and no good lawyer wants to represent Trump. Here the DOJ has clearly been dragging his feet for reasons that are unrelated to the legal system.

      Then there are these antitrust cases that are objectively EXTREMELY complex, and where the legal arguments have to be very carefully constructed to withstand a challenge from the best lawyers money can buy. Complain about the former, not the latter

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Yeah especially when you consider that this “conservative democrat president” is the one who put Lina Khan at the head of the FTC and Merrick Garland at the head of the DOJ, and is why for one of the few times In my life I’m seeing news articles about people in the government doing their fucking job of protecting the American people from American Corporations.

      • @cornshark
        link
        14 hours ago

        I thought the stolen documents case WAS being prosecuted? By Jack Smith?