• halfwaythere
    link
    English
    87 hours ago

    Can you shoot? Can you move? Can you communicate?

    Then who the fuck cares who you prefer to be involved with!? Especially when a lot of soldiers/officers seem to like to be with other people’s wives/husbands!

    • Flying Squid
      link
      11 hour ago

      This is the same reason why women should be allowed the same combat positions as men. They still aren’t and it’s stupid.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5912 hours ago

    “Since DADT repeal [in 2010], many veterans who sought to upgrade their less than honorable discharges reported a prolonged and burdensome process, often requiring the use of a lawyer, to seek the respect and benefits they rightfully earned,” the letter stated. “And far too many veterans discharged under DADT had no idea they could seek an upgrade or where to start the process.”

    Austin said today that 96% of the service members who were separated under DADT now have an honorable discharge.

    “We will continue to strive to do right by every American patriot who has honorably served their country,” he said.

    Glad the Biden Admin proactively upgraded their discharge statuses so no more veterans have to fight to change theirs

    • Dragon "Rider"(drag)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Drag hopes they also want to do right by the unpatriotic veterans who honorably served their country and in the process got disillusioned and radicalised.

    • @InverseParallax
      link
      English
      710 hours ago

      Glad the Biden Admin proactively upgraded their discharge statuses so no more veterans have to fight to change theirs

      Nooo! Shut up! We have to focus on the horrible genocide in Gaza, while steering hard away from the horrible genocide in Ukraine!!!

      –all of .ml

      • Flying Squid
        link
        11 hour ago

        They also don’t want you to talk about the genocide those now honorably discharged veterans are facing in event of a Trump victory.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        5
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I’ll give you a hint about who I’m congratulating then:

        800 service members kicked out under [Don’t Ask Don’t Tell] just got discharges upgraded to honorable

        As for what that has to do with love, I’m sorry that you don’t understand what they told that they weren’t supposed to tell.

        Maybe you need to look up what Don’t Ask Don’t Tell was?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        You can read about the context of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell on Wikipedia.

        Or the article itself also explains why the other commentator wrote that ;)

    • Orbituary
      link
      English
      4812 hours ago

      All justice should be swifter. I’m still glad some people got acknowledged.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -2211 hours ago

    Conceptually I think this is great.

    But… How many folk are now eligible to be recalled to active duty?

    • @mipadaitu
      link
      English
      2711 hours ago

      Probably zero since this all happened decades ago at this point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      58 hours ago

      That’s not how it works. To be recalled you have to still be in the irr. To be in the irr you have to re-enlist. You can’t re-enlist if you’re discharged for dadt. If they still qualify for irr they could of course sign a new contract but that’d be entirely their decision.

    • @betterdeadthanreddit
      link
      English
      1010 hours ago

      If anyone becomes eligible for recall due to this discharge upgrade, it’d be a very small number and even then, there’s next to no chance that they’d actually get called up. Can’t rule it out entirely because something about a Sith and absolutes (and because I don’t care to dig into the statistics) but realistically, it won’t happen.

      10 U.S.C. § 688 (Retired members: authority to order to active duty; duties)

      …a member described in subsection (b) may be ordered to active duty by the Secretary of the military department concerned at any time.

      (b) Covered Members.-Except as provided in subsection (d), subsection (a) applies to the following members of the armed forces:

      (1) A retired member of the Regular Army, Regular Navy, Regular Air Force, or Regular Marine Corps.

      (2) A member of the Retired Reserve who was retired under section 1293, 7311, 7314, 8323, 9311, or 9314 of this title.

      (3) A member of the Fleet Reserve or Fleet Marine Corps Reserve.

      (4) A retired member of the Space Force.

      This section states that retirees of armed forces branches and reservists may be recalled to active duty. The thing about subsection (d) refers to a program where officers could choose to retire early so doesn’t really come into play for what we’re talking about. It’s worth noting that a service member who completes their contract is not necessarily a retiree which is why the recall authority doesn’t apply more broadly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 hours ago

        Yeah I’m not aware of any mechanism to recall any former enlisted servicemember past their IRR period.

        • @betterdeadthanreddit
          link
          English
          39 hours ago

          I figure if things get bad enough that they’d want any of us fat, broken old(ish)-timers back, we’ll see some new laws on the books making it possible.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            11 hour ago

            DADT ended in 2011. The military would have to be pretty desperate to want most of those veterans back in service.

          • @AquaTofana
            link
            39 hours ago

            Bruh, if I got out and fulfilled my IRR honorably and whatnot, and then I was recalled years later, I would promptly smoke all the pot in reasonable distance from me the moment I received that recall notice.