Ukraine is seriously considering the possibility of restoring nuclear weapons. This is reported by Bild with reference to a source.

“We have the materials, we have the knowledge. If there is an order, it will only take us a few weeks to get the first bomb,” said a Ukrainian official.

And Western countries should think less about Russia’s red lines and much more about Ukraine’s red lines.

According to analyst Julian Repke, a condition for restoring the nuclear weapons Ukraine has surrendered could be a second attempt by the Russian Federation to go after Kyiv.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1552 months ago

    Didn’t Ukraine give up its nukes specifically under the condition that Russia would leave them alone as a free independent nation? Seems those terms went out the window years ago.

    • @Fosheze
      link
      English
      842 months ago

      Exactly. That treaty was already violated. So there is no longer any treaty preventing them from becomming a nuclear power again.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        352 months ago

        I’m surprised it took them this long to even threaten the idea, although it could simply be that they already built some weapons to have a stockpile before the announcement. I can totally see Putin thinking “oh they only have one bomb, that’s an acceptable loss to stop them from building more before we have another MAD stalemate.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 months ago

      Yes and that exchange has been observed by the whole world. I doubt we will ever see one like it again

      • RubberDuck
        link
        222 months ago

        Anyone that gives up all of their nukes is nuts… as demonstrated by the Ukraine case.

        You might limit the amount, how many do you really need … not thousands… that’s expensive anyway.

        With this message I would not be surprised if in some underground mining complex Ukraine has centrifuges being installed already.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 months ago

          Well they claim they have what they need already.

          Unknown if that’s for a dirty bomb or a true nuclear fission weapon

          • RubberDuck
            link
            112 months ago

            They have ballistic missiles and plenty of nuclear materials. If the nuclear materials are weapons grade is doubtfull but not impossible

            • bluGill
              link
              fedilink
              32 months ago

              Producing weapons grade nuclear materials isn’t that difficult. Iran is believed to only need a few weeks if they want to. (IRAN has known stock piles of just below weapons, but well above power plant grade Uranium). Many of us could probably do it in our basement if we could get our hands on enough Uranium. (there are a number of ways to die a painful death doing this as most people work in their basement, but we could probably get enough to produce a bomb before we died). With the knowledge anyone has and Ukraine’s current nuclear power plants and thus nuclear knowledge it is reasonable to assume they could get the weapons grade nuclear material if they really wanted.

              • RubberDuck
                link
                22 months ago

                Yeah, and I read that the byproduct of nuclear power generation is plutonium which can also be used as a Hiroshima style nuclear weapon, not in the megaton range but probably enough to get the point across.

          • @CheeseNoodle
            link
            English
            32 months ago

            I mean refinining is the hard part, Actually assembling a gun-type nuclear device is rather simple by the standards of modern technology.

        • @captainlezbian
          link
          22 months ago

          They aren’t even the only country to do it that’s currently in serious conflict with a nuclear power. Canada did it and now has pulled all diplomats from India.

    • @HappycamperNZ
      link
      162 months ago

      And that the US would protect them if attacked.

      '93 Budapest protocol I believe

      • @2pt_perversion
        link
        22
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That is not what the Budapest Memorandum says. It’s really short so you can just read it but it only requires the US to bring the matter to the UN security counsel which they have. Russia has violated most provisions but the US hasn’t violated any.

        • @HappycamperNZ
          link
          142 months ago

          Knew I was missing something.

          Kinda seems like a moot clause considering Russia has veto powers in the UNSC.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        Ah I wasn’t aware of that part of the deal. I wonder if they’re threatening nukes because they’re getting nervous that Trump might get re-elected and not honor that deal?

        • @Madison420
          link
          122 months ago

          They’re threatening to build nukes because they have nukes, I believe both France and Israel came out as nuclear nations in the same “we’ll just float becoming a nuclear nation and see what happens.”

          There’s still Soviet nuclear material missing and Ukraine has both mines and the know how to assemble older nukes anyway because that was done to some extent in Ukraine during the Soviet Union.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    812 months ago

    As much as I hate to see nuclear proliferation, Russia hasnt really given Ukraine much choice in the matter, seeing that Russia is willing to invade any non-nuclear states around it.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    422 months ago

    Unfortunately this is the only kind of language Russia understands.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      242 months ago

      They’re right to do it.

      Russia proved to the world that every single promise made for nuclear non-proliferation is a lie, and the only way to deter an empire remains “be fucking dangerous”.

      It’s very fucking sad and we’re committing to MADness harder than ever because of Putin and Russian dumbass hardass culture.

      Russian men are to blame for wanting all this, demanding it, fighting for it instead of against it.

      It seems entirely possible to me that Russia decides to preemptively nuke Ukraine to prevent them from getting their own, and at that point either the US decides it’s not worth retaliating for them, or the end of the world is ordered … but even if that happens, I just don’t care. Reason and stability are forfeit and before we get people back on board, before we get Russians back to it, I wouldn’t be surprised if there has to be close calls where everything might go wrong and never get another chance to be resolved. But I’ve lived my whole life with the nuclear threat and the doomsday clock strongly defining everything that ever happened in my life as borrowed time, permitted by empires withholding global annihilation. I’ve come to fucking accept it a long time ago. The cultural impact of nuclear doomsday threats on widespread nihilism seems obvious. And in my mind it’s just fucking fitting that stupid humans should choose to fuck eachother completely over and be left with nothing to lord over. Going into it knowing that and being fine with it because at least the enemy is also obliterated, poisoned, and doomed. Humans are just like that. We’re angry idiots and a lot of us deserve that kind of end. If going interstellar was ever a distant potential, it might even be for the best that we don’t bring our bullshit outside Earth’s cradle. It seems insane to me that anyone could not be feeling misanthropic after the failures of the hopes built up in the late 80’s.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        You need to understand that Putin is only ordering a nuclear strike as the last option for him to stay in power, because after that he knows that is only a matter of time before someone kill him, what can happen is Russia backing out and he pray for the population to not rebel against him, and to be fair, Russians don’t give a fuck so that would happen

        • @werefreeatlast
          link
          12 months ago

          Hopefully a large building crumbles over putin accidentally like the Hamas incident thus week.

      • @captainlezbian
        link
        12 months ago

        It’s not just the US. Nuclear launches any nuclear power allied with Ukraine could fire. My bets are actually on France or the UK

  • atro_city
    link
    fedilink
    282 months ago

    Do it. It could neutralize the threats from Russia about dropping nuclear bombs. It might be the only to get the scaredy-cats in Western Europe to agree to long-range weapons since Russia’s threats would be quite useless.

    • @Valmond
      link
      6
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Long range weapons and more weapons too.

      One can hope.

      Edit: BTW the image looks like a screenshot from C&C lol

      • atro_city
        link
        fedilink
        42 months ago

        Edit: BTW the image looks like a screenshot from C&C lol

        For real 🤣

  • Skeezix
    link
    English
    92 months ago

    Looks like roasted orc is back on the menu boys.

    Seriously though, I doubt Ukraine would turn their own land into a radioactive wasteland. Which means they would fling them into russia. Which would escalate things

      • Skeezix
        link
        English
        52 months ago

        I do. Which means the whole strategy of the announcement is simply to get more conventional weapons support from supportive nations.

        • @captainlezbian
          link
          12 months ago

          I think it’s also to begin establishing the “if we’re already doomed” part of MAD.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      Russia launches nukes at Ukraine and it’ll be WWIII

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 months ago

      That’s a brilliant plan. Nuclear armed countries generally have a policy of “live and let live” once they get nuked so that should work out great.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        Live and let live… man that sounds stellar.

        Probably why Russia made an agreement with Ukraine in 2014 regarding nuclear disarmament on the condition Russia let Ukraine live and let live.

        How did that go? Russia (as always) negotiated in bad faith.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          I’m not arguing that Russia is trustworthy. I’m saying that nuclear retaliation is a standard policy for any nuclear power.

          We’d be relying on an other Stanislav Petrov to save us. I don’t like those odds.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -22 months ago

    Ukrainian nuclear weapons aren’t a credible threat to Russia, for the same reason Russia’s aren’t to Ukraine: It isn’t under an immediate threat of being wiped out, just losing territory. I think this is aimed more at the United States, trying to pressure them into keeping up or increasing aid with the threat of nuclear proliferation (as Japan, Taiwan and Saudi Arabia have done). There is also the possibility that in a Trump administration, loss of US aid could turn the war back into an existential threat where nuclear weapons could be used.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      To threaten Russia all you need to do is threaten Moscow and Petersburg. The rest of the country doesn’t exist as far as power structures are concerned.

    • @ikidd
      link
      English
      12 months ago

      Not sure why you’re getting downvoted. That is exactly what this is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        I assume people decided it had the vibe of accusing Ukraine of being underhanded (it’s not, but internet gonna internet)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -32 months ago

    They have the capabilities?, they have nuclear power tho, but that’s a not of money required

  • RubberDuck
    link
    -92 months ago

    With the amount of nuclear reactors they have any actual nuke will for sure be answered with dirty bombs.

  • @Siegfried
    link
    -132 months ago

    Well, that is a bad choice of words.