• @Treczoks
    link
    838 minutes ago

    That is the culinary answer for the question.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    17 minutes ago

    Be more specific with the question.

    “How do I wash a pigeon”

    Or put every single word in quotations so it actually searches the whole string and doesn’t truncate the query to just 2 or 3 keywords because this is clearly ignoring the “rescued” part.

  • @ikidd
    link
    English
    323 minutes ago

    If you asked me to clean a bird, this is exactly what I would think of. Though usually it involves removing lead shot, not labels.

  • peopleproblems
    link
    111 minutes ago

    Don’t worry y’all AI will take r jerbs

  • @IsThisAnAI
    link
    134 minutes ago

    Meh, pretty easy mistake of context.

    • @jj4211
      link
      24 minutes ago

      I mean, not one a human would ever make.

      First off, the word “rescued” would have immediately made the context of “protect the pigeon” clear.

      Second, a “rescued pigeon” wouldn’t have a label on it, so it’s clearly mixing in something from likely a store bought turkey, but then the other steps don’t make sense either as those don’t apply either.

      A traditional search approach would not have made the mistake either. It would either have failed to find anything or found actual on topic results. It’s “clever” enough to genericize “pigeon” to “birds” and hit upon text related to birds from a grocery store and birds that you hunted and mix all that together in a coherent language but with content that is nonsense.

      In this case, hilarious, in other day to day situations, it’s maddening, as some professional colleague gets the same sort of nonsense but lacks knowledge to correct it and relays it as fact. Then when called out on the data was in fact so bad it wasted time, they just say ‘oh, lol, AI’ (they wanted to take credit for it if it worked, but can hide behind AI when it doesn’t).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    924 hours ago

    lol, definitely missed some important context.

    I guess it thought OOP meant “clean” as in how do you dress the bird before you cook it. (As in: “clean a fish” means to filet a fish and prep it for cooking.)

    • @TexasDrunk
      link
      554 hours ago

      I rarely remove the label from the fish I catch.

      • @bassomitron
        link
        English
        313 hours ago

        Well obviously not for fish. Sounds like someone’s never bought fresh pigeons from the grocery store, smh.

      • @Zombiepirate
        link
        English
        163 hours ago

        It’s actually illegal to cut those off.

        • BlueKey
          link
          fedilink
          153 hours ago

          Yea, it voids the warranty. So when you get poisoned after eating it without label, you won’t be able to get a refund.

          • @Cryophilia
            link
            223 minutes ago

            BREAKING NEWS: Mother Nature recalls over 1000 lbs of tuna

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            146 seconds ago

            Be sure you read the EULA before you clean a pigeon.

    • @jaybone
      link
      11 minute ago

      But first it said they are usually clean. So that can’t be the context. If there was a context. But there is no context because AI is fucking stupid and all these c-suite assholes pushing it like their last bowel movement will be eating crow off of their golden parakeet about two years from now when all this nonsense finally goes away and the new shiny thing is flashing around.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    324 hours ago

    I like the idea that these are scientist-monitored birds that you remove the tag from before dressing and eating.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      17 minutes ago

      It would make an interesting footnote in the scientific article that had this pigeon in the experiment.

      “1 This pigeon was removed from the experiment as it was eaten by a local Florida Man.”

  • @Lost_My_Mind
    link
    354 hours ago

    I’m going to build a bunch of cyborgs, who follow orders exclusively via googleAI.

    I figure once I release about 4 billion of them into the world, either google stops doing evil shit, or they do REALLY evil shit. We shall see what happens…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 minutes ago

      It is kind of an Interesting idea: what does “statistical average morality” look like when it’s got a 3m tall power frame and a handheld howitzer?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Pigeon = edible bird

    Cleaning a bird > preparing a bird after killing it (hunting term)

    AI figured the “rescued” part was either a mistake or that the person wanted to eat a bird they rescued

    If you make a research for “how to clean a dirty bird” you give it better context and it comes up with a better reply

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The context is clear to a human. If an LLM is giving advice to everybody who asks a question in Google, it needs to do a much better job at giving responses.

        • @HereIAm
          link
          326 minutes ago

          Ah yes. I always forget to remove the label from my hunted bird. Cleaning “the top bone” is such a chore as well.

    • @HighlyRegardedArtist
      link
      102 hours ago

      Or, hear me out, there was NO figuring of any kind, just some magic LLM autocomplete bullshit. How hard is this to understand?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I like how you’re making excuses for something that it is very clear in context. I thought AI was great at picking up context?

      • @lunarul
        link
        229 minutes ago

        I thought AI was great at picking up context?

        I don’t know why you thought that. LLMs split your question into separate words and assigns scores to those words, then looks up answers relevant to those words. It has no idea of how those words are relevant to each other. That’s why LLMs couldn’t answer how many "r"s are in “strawberry”. They assigned the word “strawberry” a lower relevancy score in that question. The word “rescue” is probably treated the same way here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 hour ago

        I don’t think they are really “making excuses”, just explaining how the search came up with those steps, which what the OP is so confused about.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      338 minutes ago

      AI will take jobs when the shareholders think it will make them more money. This has very little if not nothing to do with how good said AI is at the job.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 hours ago

      Eventually, it will. Because even with janky responses like that one, corporations will try to cost save everywhere they can. Is AI at the point where it will happen this year? Hell no! But don’t think it isn’t the direction they are trying to take it.

  • @WrenFeathers
    link
    104 hours ago

    It’s all fun and games until someone gets hurt. They need to pull the plug on this shit and stop beta testing misinformation.

  • @EtherWhack
    link
    104 hours ago

    I mean, if they were actually “clean” and had a healthy diet compared to what they eat in urban areas, they could make an awesome protein source for the budget minded.

    • @WhiteOakBayou
      link
      114 hours ago

      Not they could. They do. You can buy squab in restaurants. Maybe stores but none I’ve seen.

      • @EtherWhack
        link
        10
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Though, you wouldn’t want to eat one you “recovered” from an urban area that’s had an unknown diet, due to all the toxins it may have accumulated in its body.

        • @TexasDrunk
          link
          64 hours ago

          Incidentally that’s also why you shouldn’t eat me.

          • atro_city
            link
            fedilink
            145 minutes ago

            The alien invaders killing and consuming millions of humans in movies should be shown 5 years later or something. Trying to recover from all the shit they ate.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -23 hours ago

      You theoretically could, but small birds like that have very little meat on their bones. Most hunt duck or turkey for a reason, the bigger birds have more meat.